similar to: Releasing the CentOS Linux 7 Installation Guide

Some time ago I started working, with Jim Perrin, on manually converting the single page HTML Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Installation Guide to be rebranded and reworked for CentOS Linux 7. https://github.com/CentOS/docs/tree/master/legacy_docs I wanted to alert folks that this is being worked on, that we want to get it completed ASAP to help support people migrating to CentOS Linux 7, and there

Hi all, I did try to do this myself as I thought Tuomas had introduced himself and gotten wiki access for other pages ... but my skills with the #acl markup have atrophied and I couldn't make it work. :) I'd like Tuomas to have access so there is a clear commit record of him having down the work, and in the future to collaborate on any adjustments to that page. best regards, - Karsten

Karsten, On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:06 PM Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > There is now a draft permission letter working it's way through the > CentOS Board. It is intended to cover permission for just the GNOME > Project's use with GNOME Boxes. This is *really* good news! > > I am still pursuing resolving this within the

Thanks Rich for drawing this forward, I had missed it. (I generally handle all the trademark usage queries.) The key reference is this one, the trademark guidelines: https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/ That document should give the GNOME project all of the authorization and guidelines on how to use and not use the CentOS marks. Fabiano -- if you have any further questions, you may also

Karsten, On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > Thanks Rich for drawing this forward, I had missed it. (I generally > handle all the trademark usage queries.) > > The key reference is this one, the trademark guidelines: > > https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/ > > That document should give the GNOME project all of the

On 09/18/2018 11:03 AM, Fabiano Fid?ncio wrote: > My understanding is that we can use all the CentOS marks provided here[0]. > However, those unfortunately are not looking good enough on Boxes and > we'd like to use, if possible, just the logo as in here[1] > > Would that be possible? As far as I could understand that would be a > violation of the trademark. > > [0]:

Hi all, There is now a draft permission letter working it's way through the CentOS Board. It is intended to cover permission for just the GNOME Project's use with GNOME Boxes. I am still pursuing resolving this within the guidelines, that will take more time. Best regards, - Karsten On 10/16/2018 07:10 AM, Fabiano Fid?ncio wrote: > People, > > On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 09:28

Hi all: Since our designer friend Tuomas Kuosmanen (tigert) already did the hard work of specifying the CentOS logo colors in HEX, Pantone, and CMYK ... I did the small step of adding them to the wiki. This might be useful for you all to know it's now there: https://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/Brand/Logo#logo-colors Also, I put a link back to the trademark guidelines for questions that are

On 3/5/19 1:13 PM, Alan Bartlett wrote: > Please refresh my memory by specifying "that page" of which you mention, above. Sorry, didn't notice that omission. This page: https://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/Brand/Logo Best, - Karsten -- Karsten Wade | Community Architect | @quaid Red Hat Open Source and Standards (OSAS) : @redhatopen https://community.redhat.com |

Some or all of you may be aware that people often contact the CentOS Project because they come across the default Apache server test page on a non-centos.org domain. In trying to contact the domain owner, they mistakenly contact us. This is despite the language at the bottom of the page telling them what they are seeing and not to contact us about it. This has come up for me in responding to

** Delivery incomplete ** There was a temporary problem delivering your message to curtiskwong101 at gmail.com. Gmail will retry for 47 more hours. You'll be notified if the delivery fails permanently. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20180919/7249d4a2/attachment-0002.html>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/11/2016 09:48 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > AFAIK /HowTos/CommunityBuildSystem has always been the one > referenced everywhere, and then also > https://wiki.centos.org//HowTos/CommunityBuildSystem/KojiOperations > > Maybe Brian should just link to those ones, as it appears that he > copied/paste content from original page into

> ? 2015?6?5????6:10?Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> ??? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 06/04/2015 12:58 PM, Pete Travis wrote: > >> >> I'm tentatively planning on working pagure[0] into the Fedora Docs >> toolchain. It handles issue tracking, process >> documentation/contribution guidelines, and of course

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/11/2016 09:18 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: > What are the thoughts or concerns about this sort of workflow > change? Any chance Moin Moin can store wiki source in git and sync automatically with a central git repository? It would provide another pathway to suggest edits to the wiki without requiring wiki edit permissions. For new

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/30/2015 09:19 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote: > An alternative approach would be to build the docs in CI and link > to the built version in a comment on both systems. This is an interesting idea. We'll end up wanting docs to build in the CI anyway, so this could be done using e.g. a -draft tag so an initial commit can be used to both build

Hi all, do you have a process in mind for selecting GSoC applicants? Regards Lars > On 10 Mar 2015, at 23:28, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/10/2015 05:32 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 03/09/2015 10:22 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: >>> KB: >>> >>>

On 12/23/2014 03:56 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > On Tuesday 23 December 2014, PatrickD Garvey > <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > >> In >> http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2c >> >> ca54dd79e5 the standard for the wiki username is established as >> FirstnameLastname. >> >> In

Hi Kartsen, you'll have my proposal by the end of the day. I am not good at writing content. :( I have sorted out all the technicalities though. Regards, Kunal Jain On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Kunaal: > > I know you are still researching, but I think you may have

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2015 11:33 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: > My only question is, how do we determine what goes in the wiki vs > what goes in git? The flow/format between the two is a bit > different. Or is this development the first step in the transition > away from the wiki to another medium? That's a good question, and I don't have it

Would start with the note that the basic project is complete. I would be releasing the prototype on a separate thread. But for the discussion sake the workflow will look like this : Authors contribute content in markdown format, on github. The pull request created gets mirrored to pagure thus saving dependency on github. Also the PR content is built using CI to preview how it looks. The PR is two