similar to: [DISCUSS] Wiki page for centos atomic registry

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty <lmohanty at redhat.com> wrote: > On 06/20/2016 05:55 PM, Mohammed Ahmed wrote: > > Hi, > > As per discussion in CCCP (Centos Community Container Pipeline) > project, it was recommended to create a wiki page for "Atomic Registry" on > wiki.centos.org. I am therefore requesting a creation of the same, >

On 06/20/2016 05:55 PM, Mohammed Ahmed wrote: > Hi, > > As per discussion in CCCP (Centos Community Container Pipeline) > project, it was recommended to create a wiki page for "Atomic > Registry" on wiki.centos.org <http://wiki.centos.org>. I am therefore > requesting a creation of the same, along-with a homepage. > > I am not decided as to where in

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Mohammed Ahmed <moahmed at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > As per discussion in CCCP (Centos Community Container Pipeline) project, > it was recommended to create a wiki page for "Atomic Registry" on > wiki.centos.org. I am therefore requesting a creation of the same, > along-with a homepage. > > I am not decided as to where

Hi, I am requesting write access on the Container pipeline wiki page [1] so that i can update the same. Also, i would like the creation of my home page so that i can include my information as well wiki.centos.org username : ZeeshanAhmed <https://wiki.centos.org/ZeeshanAhmed> Email : mohammed.zee1000 at gmail.com [1] https://wiki.centos.org/ContainerPipeline Thanks -- *Mohammed

On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free, >> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it. >> >> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer? >> >> The registration with Redhat seemed very bureaucratic to me, >> and I'm not sure

On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb at redhat.com> wrote: > On 05/12/2015 06:13 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've created http://wiki.centos.org/ContainerPipleline as a placeholder >> to start populating about the pipeline. Although this will run from >> ci.centos.org hosted infra ( http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/CI ) - and it

Hi, I've created http://wiki.centos.org/ContainerPipleline as a placeholder to start populating about the pipeline. Although this will run from ci.centos.org hosted infra ( http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/CI ) - and it will form a sort of ecocystem test + release process, I think it deserves scope beyond being just under the CI namespace. - KB -- Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS

Does anyone know the "standard" commandline to compile and run spec95 benchmarks ? I found some scripts in llvm test suite (External/SPEC/CINT95), but I am not sure if they are the *default ref* configurations. <Some of them seem to use smaller problem sizes.> SPEC95 was retired many years ago, so few people around me know how to compile and run them. I am building from

Some of the run commandlines don't seem to be the *default ref* configuration. For instance, in 099.go, what's in the script is: LEVEL = ../../../.. BM=099.go ifeq ($(RUN_TYPE),test) STDIN_FILENAME = /dev/null STDOUT_FILENAME = null.out RUN_OPTIONS = 40 19 else STDIN_FILENAME = 2stone9.in STDOUT_FILENAME = 2stone9.out RUN_OPTIONS = 50 9 endif include ../../Makefile.spec95

hi guys, we've got more and more people who need edit rights to this page, at https://wiki.centos.org/ContainerPipeline - is it worth doing a ContainerEngGroup and make that group own this page instead of adding usernames to the page itself ? Regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Long Fei wrote: > Does anyone know the "standard" commandline to compile and run spec95 > benchmarks ? > > I found some scripts in llvm test suite (External/SPEC/CINT95), but I am not > sure if they are the *default ref* configurations. <Some of them seem to use > smaller problem sizes.> SPEC95 was retired many years ago, so few people

On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Long Fei wrote: > which suggests the compiling command: > gcc -DSPEC_CPU95 -O2 -o spec_go g2.c g22.c g23.c g25.c g26.c g27a.c g27b.c > g28.c g29.c g2eye.c g2jlib2.c g2jos.c g2list.c g2reas.c g2s2.c g2s3.c g2shp.c > and the running commandline: > ./spec_go 50 9 2stone9.in > < are these correct ? > I believe that we only include test/train inputs for

hi Bama since there are other things going on in the container space around centos, I was thinking maybe we can setup a /Container page, and then have a /Container/Registry and a /Container/Pipeline page each. the pipeline page can talk about the service, code and run setup. and the registry page can talk about howto get content in there, what content is already there and urls to the user setup

Hello all, I'm trying to run Football Manager 2009 under Wine. I installed the application; But see what's happening. wine fm.exe err:service:validate_service_config Service L"Macsvmgbbsbs" has an unknown service type err:service:scmdatabase_load_services Invalid configuration of service L"Macsvmgbbsbs" - skipping fixme:actctx:parse_depend_manifests Could not find

I know I've read about it under the FAQ and other various forums a dozen times, FLAC is able to encode up to 8 channels. But has anyone actually tried to do this? I ran across this nifty 7.1 wav sample courtesy of Microsoft. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/howto/articles/Multichannel.aspx#link6 For some reason the channel mask was incorrectly set to 0x3f, so I manually changed

Yes, this helps at least "single" developers and people that are training for rhce / rhcsa exam.. br, -- Eero 2016-04-04 17:16 GMT+03:00 Mohammed Zeeshan <mohammed.zee1000 at gmail.com>: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > >

On 10 October 2016 at 12:15, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > hi guys, > > we've got more and more people who need edit rights to this page, at > https://wiki.centos.org/ContainerPipeline - is it worth doing a > ContainerEngGroup and make that group own this page instead of adding > usernames to the page itself ? > > > > Regards, > >

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > >> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free, > >> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it. > >> > >> What do CentOS users think of

On 10/10/16 16:46, Alan Bartlett wrote: > In turn, I ask where the "more and more people" are actually > requesting edit access for that page? It certainly is not on this > mailing list. so far, its just been the guys who are working on the buildsystem behind it - a couple of other folks ( eg. from the SIGs ) who have asked I sent to the list, but going back does not look like

It turns out that the release of Centos-3.3 was so popular, that it threw us way over the threshold of our ISP's, and now we are stuck with a _very_ large bill (as in an estimated 6TB of transfers). While in one hand I am ecstatic that we are so successful, but on the other hand, that is coming out of the developers pockets. The developers should be the last ones footing these bills (and this