similar to: Docs strategy and tactics

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dave Neary" <dneary at redhat.com> > To: "Mail list for wiki articles" <centos-docs at centos.org> > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 1:42:06 PM > Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] Docs strategy and tactics [RFC] > > Hi, > > On 03/16/2015 03:44 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: > > On 03/16/2015 11:33 AM, Jim Perrin

As I discussed earlier with you, I am very much excited about this idea, bringing a new user friendly standard of writing as well as accessing the documentation. A couple of queries, The author writes up in markup language -> possibly host the content on github -> discussion over the content on mailing list -> changes to be done -> changes done -- seems fine till here. We define a

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/12/2015 04:59 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: <much snipping> > That would allow for us to mirror content to github.com/CentOS and > people could use Prose.io for editing and pull requests to submit > content. We would sync all that back to git.centos.org. > The last I looked at Prose.io, it wanted more privilege than I was

Hi, On 03/16/2015 03:44 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: > On 03/16/2015 11:33 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: >> My only question is, how do we determine what goes in the wiki vs >> what goes in git? The flow/format between the two is a bit >> different. Or is this development the first step in the transition >> away from the wiki to another medium? > > That's a good question,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2015 07:50 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: > On 03/16/2015 01:42 PM, Dave Neary wrote: >> Prominent wiki-like controls are important to getting drive-by >> edits, and I am personally a fan of the in-place editing >> experience you get from a good wiki. > > I wonder if we can find a way to make the "Edit this page

On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 01:54 +0530, kunaal jain wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Shaun McCance <shaunm at redhat.com> wrote: > > I like putting focus on this. It provides people a resource for things > > they actually want to do. Nobody wants just an operating system. I also > > think it's a great avenue for getting community contributions. It's

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2015 01:42 PM, Dave Neary wrote: > Prominent wiki-like controls are important to getting drive-by > edits, and I am personally a fan of the in-place editing experience > you get from a good wiki. I wonder if we can find a way to make the "Edit this page on GitHub" more obvious then? Because I agree, the [edit] link on

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Kunaal: I know you are still researching, but I think you may have enough to write up your proposal in the Melange tool. The deadline for applications to be input is 27 March at 19:00 UTC. However, that is followed by a few more weeks for you to work with me and other mentors/helpers to refine the application. So your next step is to work on and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2015 11:33 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: > My only question is, how do we determine what goes in the wiki vs > what goes in git? The flow/format between the two is a bit > different. Or is this development the first step in the transition > away from the wiki to another medium? That's a good question, and I don't have it

On 03/12/2015 03:59 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: > I've been thinking for a little while, and talking with people, about > what would be a good documentation strategy for the CentOS Project. > > == tl;dnr aka Summary > > This is a proposal around creating new, short-format > documentation about doing cool new things on top of CentOS > Linux. These docs would support the work

> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Shaun McCance <shaunm at redhat.com> wrote: > I like putting focus on this. It provides people a resource for things > they actually want to do. Nobody wants just an operating system. I also > think it's a great avenue for getting community contributions. It's easy > to make a one-time contribution on a topic you know well without

Hi Kartsen, you'll have my proposal by the end of the day. I am not good at writing content. :( I have sorted out all the technicalities though. Regards, Kunal Jain On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Kunaal: > > I know you are still researching, but I think you may have

On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 14:59 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > I've been thinking for a little while, and talking with people, about > what would be a good documentation strategy for the CentOS Project. > > == tl;dnr aka Summary > > This is a proposal around creating new, short-format > documentation about doing cool new things on top of CentOS > Linux. These docs would

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Shaun McCance <shaunm at redhat.com> wrote: > Just to throw another wrench in: I don't know what DigitalOcean's docs > are like, but Linode generally provides their guides for Ubuntu, Debian, > and CentOS. However, for whatever reason, they tend to do Ubuntu first. > So there are bunches of guides without CentOS versions. > > They do

Hey folks, Could we have a talk about the website homepage layout? Here is a tentative sketch I am working on for the a new website theme: https://centos.gitlab.io/artwork/centos-web/jekyll-theme-centos-base/documentation/#the-page-basehome-layout In this layout: Are "News and Events" and "Blog Posts" redundant sections?? Does it make sense to present only extracts from

Hi, I just wanted to mail community first and get the discussion started, but I should have written details first. The main aim behind this project is to facilitate contributors, so the site generator should be such that, it doesn't complicate the workflow. Another constraint is that the site generator should require minimal human effort, as we plan to build the site continuously through CI,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I've been thinking for a little while, and talking with people, about what would be a good documentation strategy for the CentOS Project. == tl;dnr aka Summary This is a proposal around creating new, short-format documentation about doing cool new things on top of CentOS Linux. These docs would support the work of the various SIGs (Cloud,

Alain, That looks great and the sections make sense as you've described them. As far as News and Events and Blog, I do think they're the same thing but I kind of like the idea of calling it News and Events vs Blog. Amy *Amy Marrich* She/Her/Hers Principal Technical Marketing Manager - Cloud Platforms Red Hat, Inc <https://www.redhat.com/> amy at redhat.com Mobile:

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. arrfab pushed a commit to branch master in repository centos/centos.org. The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new cd66094 Updated/Removed/Added sponsors to reflect actual list cd66094 is described below commit cd660941183914fe0e97c622fb0ec03828d4a0db Author: Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at

Hi, I running into the following problem on my Asterisk setup: --snip-- [Sep 3 01:40:59] NOTICE[9170] chan_dahdi.c: PRI got event: HDLC Abort (6) on Primary D-channel of span 3 [Sep 3 01:47:07] ERROR[9170] chan_dahdi.c: No more room in scheduler [Sep 3 01:47:07] ERROR[9170] chan_dahdi.c: Asked to delete sched id -1??? [Sep 3 01:47:07] ERROR[9170] chan_dahdi.c: No more room in scheduler [Sep