similar to: the install url on wiki.centos.org homepage

On 01/09/2015 11:49 PM, Tom Sorensen wrote: > KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with > discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in the main channel > having issues with Atomic (there's a name that's going to end up causing > problems...) and the continued use of RPMForge/RepoForge, with no > indication that they're really

hi, The install option on the wiki homepage looks a bit odd, is it really meant to point at the generic docs landing page for CentOS-5 ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

hi guys, we've got more and more people who need edit rights to this page, at https://wiki.centos.org/ContainerPipeline - is it worth doing a ContainerEngGroup and make that group own this page instead of adding usernames to the page itself ? Regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

hi folks, making a few edits i just noticed that a lot of emails get sent out on every edit on wiki.c.o - this isnt a problem as such, but i wonder if its better for more people to use an rss feed ? alternatively, do we need/want a wiki-commits list that gets all of these, and people can just subscribe to that list ? Regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ |

On 10/10/16 16:46, Alan Bartlett wrote: > In turn, I ask where the "more and more people" are actually > requesting edit access for that page? It certainly is not on this > mailing list. so far, its just been the guys who are working on the buildsystem behind it - a couple of other folks ( eg. from the SIGs ) who have asked I sent to the list, but going back does not look like

Unfortunately, I don't have edit access in the wiki. I can't even create my own personal info page. wt On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > On 22/02/16 22:58, Warren Turkal wrote: > > My wiki name: WarrenTurkal > > > > Page for addition: https://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS > > > > Proposed addition: I

On 22/02/16 22:58, Warren Turkal wrote: > My wiki name: WarrenTurkal > > Page for addition: https://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS > > Proposed addition: I would like to add a column for the product code > for the CentOS images listed with AWS marketplace URLs. I use the > product code for "CENTOS-7 x86_64" to find the AMIs to start hosts > with that image in each

On 21/06/16 23:44, Jason Brooks wrote: >> I am not decided as to where in the wiki (location) of the proposed page >> will be, and am there looking out for suggestions. > > We could put it under: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic Maybe https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos might be a good place, since its essentially a howto get started with the registry. Would that

Hi the CentOS Cloud images and other things are now built from end to end automated pipelines, but the wiki content corresponding to them isnt. Is there something that can be used to do this automation ? I have done some stuff many many years ago, via directly mangling content on the wiki objects, but that might not be the best way forward. thoughts ? Regards -- Karanbir Singh

*ping* How do I get the edit access to the wiki? Thanks, wt On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Warren Turkal <wt at penguintechs.org> wrote: > Unfortunately, I don't have edit access in the wiki. I can't even create > my own personal info page. > > wt > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> > wrote: > >> On

I highly recommend actually looking at the images :) its just a minimal install with cloud-init from extras/ added in ( for 7, the 6 ones dont have cloud-init ). the installed content delivered from the minimal.iso and the ami's should be identical in pretty much every respect. If you really want a kickstart for it, I can build one, but just run a minimal.iso install, add cloud-init to the

On 14/01/15 23:51, Trevor Hemsley wrote: > Now as far as the term "Community Approved" goes: I think it's fairly > accurate and I'm not sure what the objection to it was. We have to have > a way to say "These repos are ok" and "these suck" and "these suck worse > than that". The way the page reads at the moment seems to me to strike a

Envoy? ? partir de mon Windows Phone -----Message d'origine----- De : "Jason Antman" <jason at jasonantman.com> Envoy? : ?17/?04/?2015 06:23 ??: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS" <centos-virt at centos.org> Objet : Re: [CentOS-virt] CentOS 7 AMI Building Ok, thanks so much! That'll do fine. The only other bits mentioned on

KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in the main channel having issues with Atomic (there's a name that's going to end up causing problems...) and the continued use of RPMForge/RepoForge, with no indication that they're really really bad. As well as the recognition of the reality that there are a

Envoy? ? partir de mon Windows Phone ________________________________ De : Jason Antman<mailto:jason at jasonantman.com> Envoy? : ?17/?04/?2015 06:23 ? : Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS<mailto:centos-virt at centos.org> Objet : Re: [CentOS-virt] CentOS 7 AMI Building Ok, thanks so much! That'll do fine. The only other bits mentioned on

hi guys Ive got the videos from Paris Dojo now processed up and ready to go - the plan is to get them into the CentOSProject youtube channel. however, i was wondering if there is a way to embedd the video into the wiki pages as well. We can then have the videos for all the sessions ( or the ones we managed to record proper ) ready to view right in place that also means we end up promoting the

On 01/05/2015 04:34 PM, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > Could someone please replace the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories > with the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? > I dont understand the concept of community approved. What does that mean ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 |

On 14/01/15 23:38, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > Please help us (me, especially) understand what we may be doing to the > detriment of your use of CentOS and thereby avoid that negative > result. Lets flip this around - just going by your comments in the last few days, it seems to me that you dont actually use CentOS Linux at all and are largely unaware of how this ecosystem works. so, from

On 10/07/15 00:23, Daniel Farrell wrote: > Hello all, > > I'd like to contribute to the CentOS wiki. Per these docs[0], I > should email this list with the following information. > > Username: DanielFarrell > Contribution subject: Update CBS Koji Poodle patch docs > Contribution location: http://goo.gl/7Oe9QO (CBS HOWTO#Quickstart) for the sake of clarity, this is

let me chase that up, I dont really understand what a VPAT might be, looks to be US centric - but it also looks like it aims to make assertions on and from the CentOS project side. best to work it via the board first. Regards On 22/09/16 22:27, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback. > > How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board concern, it