similar to: Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories"

2014 Dec 09
2
raw text Access for http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories, Please.
Excellent. Thank you; a most useful option of the MoinMoin wiki. On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote: > On 9 December 2014 at 21:19, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> > wrote: > > I would like to be given sufficient access to > > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories that I may copy > the >
2014 Dec 09
2
raw text Access for http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories, Please.
I would like to be given sufficient access to http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories that I may copy the raw text to a SubPage of my HomePage. I propose to edit the links on that SubPage and submit it for review by anyone who may have sufficient knowledge to validate my changes. I have yet to work with the RPM Package Manager, so I will be making edits that need to be reviewed
2014 Dec 09
2
Homepage access, please
My wiki username is PatrickDGarvey. I would like to help clean up the link rot that seems to have infected the wiki. May I please start with edit access to my homepage? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20141208/9e8fafda/attachment.html>
2015 Jan 09
2
Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in the main channel having issues with Atomic (there's a name that's going to end up causing problems...) and the continued use of RPMForge/RepoForge, with no indication that they're really really bad. As well as the recognition of the reality that there are a
2014 Dec 14
1
Fwd: CentOS forum search link in http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories under Atomic Repo
I did the last major rewrite of the AdditionalRepos page, in large part because of issues we see repeatedly on the IRC channels. The repos placed in the "known problem" section are there for a good reason -- they replace base packages by default, or they're poorly maintained, leading to security issues. Or both. Atomic falls squarely into the former category -- it replaces key parts
2014 Dec 10
1
SerNet link in http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
SerNet has en pages on their site: http://www.SerNet.de/en/samba/ Since I am maintaining the base (en) page page of http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories shouldn't the en SerNet home page be the reference in the SerNet paragraph? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2015 Jan 07
0
Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
Patrick, looks fine to me. Thanks for the work -- when I did a major revision I tried to remove some of the rot and got tired of trying, along with refactoring the page in general. Your dedication is appreciated. On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:34 AM, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > Could someone please replace the contents of >
2015 Jan 14
6
Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:26 PM, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 03:09:01PM -0800, PatrickD Garvey wrote: >> >> Proposal: >> The Third Party Repositories section should not list any other repositories, >> but should only note there are difficulties in making several independent >> repositories safely usable and give a
2015 Jan 06
1
Pull Request wiki.c.o/FrontPage
Could someone please replace the contents of http://wiki.centos.org/FrontPage with the contents of http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/FrontPage ? In the What is CentOS? section, I have changed, "The CentOS Project mainly change packages ..." to "The CentOS Project mainly changes packages ..." That is "change" is now "changes". I have no problem with you
2014 Dec 13
3
CentOS forum search link in http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories under Atomic Repo
[ https://www.centos.org/search.php?query=atomicorp&mid=30&action=showall&andor=AND forum search] returns a 404. Can the forum search https://www.centos.org/forums/search.php? be used with parameters that will provide the supporting material for the warning "Many CentOS users have had problems after enabling this repo"? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML
2014 Dec 24
2
A Question of Style
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 7:05 PM, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Brian Stinson <bstinson at ksu.edu> wrote: > >> On Dec 23 17:05, PatrickD Garvey wrote: >> > Thank you for your contribution to the discussion. I'm glad you appear >> to >> > understand this was not directed at you
2015 Jan 15
2
Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > On 14/01/15 23:38, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > >> Please help us (me, especially) understand what we may be doing to the >> detriment of your use of CentOS and thereby avoid that negative >> result. > > Lets flip this around - just going by your comments in the last few > days, it
2015 Jan 05
0
Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
On 5 January 2015 at 16:34, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > Could someone please replace the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories > with the contents of > http://wiki.centos.org/PatrickDGarvey/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? > > I believe I have removed as much of the link rot on that page as I am capable. > If
2015 Jan 14
4
Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > On 01/09/2015 11:49 PM, Tom Sorensen wrote: >> KB -- I made those changes several months ago (Sep/Oct I believe), with >> discussion in IRC. This was after a spate of people in the main channel >> having issues with Atomic (there's a name that's going to end up causing >>
2015 Feb 09
2
Another Fedora decision
On 10 February 2015 at 10:15, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > Please allow me to make sure I am perceiving this correctly, > reports of errors found in RedHat documentation are to be reported > against the Fedora Documentation product type in the RedHat bugzilla? > and > reports of errors found in Fedora documentation are, also, to be > reported
2014 Dec 24
3
A Question of Style
On 12/23/2014 03:56 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > On Tuesday 23 December 2014, PatrickD Garvey > <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > >> In >> http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2c >> >> ca54dd79e5 the standard for the wiki username is established as >> FirstnameLastname. >> >> In
2014 Dec 15
3
Fwd: [CentOS Wiki] Update of "HowTos/Custom Kernel" by AkemiYagi
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: <noreply at centos.org> > Date: Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 2:31 PM > Subject: [CentOS Wiki] Update of "HowTos/Custom Kernel" by AkemiYagi > To: noreply at centos.org > > Dear Wiki user, > > You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "CentOS Wiki" for change notification. > > The
2015 Feb 03
6
Another Fedora decision
OK, folks. You're doing a great job of describing the current milieu with a rough description of some best practices. Now how about some specific sources you personally used to learn your craft that we can use likewise? PatrickD
2014 Dec 15
2
Fwd: [CentOS Wiki] Update of "HowTos/Custom Kernel" by AkemiYagi
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Alan Bartlett <ajb at elrepo.org> wrote: > On 15 December 2014 at 23:04, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: >>> The following page has been changed by AkemiYagi: >>> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel?action=diff&rev2=179&rev1=178 >> >> I know I'm new around here and this is
2014 Dec 23
3
A Question of Style
Please read this in the spirit of my understanding what the CentOS community norms are. I fault neither of those mentioned for doing what they have done. I just want to understand how we all are documenting the CentOS distribution. In http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2cca54dd79e5 the standard for the wiki username is established as FirstnameLastname. In