similar to: Difference between qemu-kvm-ev and qemu-kvm-ma?

Hi, We're using qemu-kvm-ev on ppc64le and I've noticed that it's included in the extras repo for ppc64le but in the qemu-kvm-ev repo for x86_64. I also noticed the version in ppc64le is lagging behind x86. I see that ppc64le is being built for this, however isn't tagged for virt7-kvm-common-release and thus showing up under /virt/kvm-common on the mirrors. Is there any

2018-05-10 21:57 GMT+02:00 Lance Albertson <lance at osuosl.org>: > I see with the introduction of CentOS 7.5 there's a new qemu-kvm-ma > package on ppc64le (which is actually newer than qemu-kvm-ev currently). > Does anyone know what the difference is between these two packages? We > currently use qemu-kvm-ev and we've run into this bug [1] which got me > wondering

Hello, Sandro! On 11.05.2018 12:19, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Sadly, the new qemu-kvm-ev we prepared for CentOS 7.5 didn't get released ( > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14764) but the new build is ready. After installing CentOS 7.5 and installing package qemu-kvm-ev I can't install KVM on x86_64 arch: command "yum -y install perf qemu-kvm-ev qemu-kvm-tools-ev

2018-05-15 12:38 GMT+02:00 Gena Makhomed <gmm at csdoc.com>: > Hello, Sandro! > > On 15.05.2018 13:24, Gena Makhomed wrote: > > failure: repodata/repomd.xml from centos-qemu-ev: [Errno 256] No more >> mirrors to try. >> http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/ >> repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found >> > >

Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.10.1 has been tagged for testing. In order to test it, please enable centos-qemu-ev-test repository after installing centos-release-qemu-ev Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi all, What are the real technical difference between qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev packages? What are the advantages to use qemu-kvm-ev (if exists someone)? Or qemu-kvm-ev makes sense when is used with ovirt only?? Thanks.

Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.13.1 <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21119> is now available for testing. I'm testing it right now in oVirt CI, if nothing shows up, I'll tag it for release in a few hours. Here's the changelog: * Thu Jan 04 2018 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> - ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.13.1 - Removing RH branding from package name * Thu

Sandro, Could you please enumerate the actual technical differences between stock qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev? For example, what could one do with qemu-kvm-ev that cannot with qemu-kvm? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo at redhat.com> > To: "Discussion about

On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:45:23 +0300 Gena Makhomed <gmm at csdoc.com> wrote: > >> Something wrong with $contentdir variable, > >> it points to altarch for x86_64 $basearch. > > > > can't reproduce on a fresh x86_64 installation. Adding Brian in case he has > > a clue for this. > > I use fresh installed x86_64 CentOS 7.5 via VNC > with

2018-05-15 14:16 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>: > > > 2018-05-15 13:53 GMT+02:00 Nerijus Baliunas <nerijus at users.sourceforge.net > >: > >> On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:45:23 +0300 Gena Makhomed <gmm at csdoc.com> wrote: >> >> > >> Something wrong with $contentdir variable, >> > >> it points to altarch

Hello I saw that qemu-kvm-rhev has fixed the issue, but CentOS community hasn't updated the repaired version of qemu-kvm-ev; will it be fixed in the future? thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20210303/4b546109/attachment-0005.html>

2018-05-15 14:39 GMT+02:00 Nerijus Baliunas <nerijus at users.sourceforge.net>: > On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:18:08 +0200 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> > wrote: > > > >> I have freshly installed CentOS 7.5 on a Dell server, and > > >> /etc/yum/vars/contentdir > > >> contains 'altarch' too. CentOS 7.4->7.5 upgraded servers

Hi, the latest qemu-kvm-ev has been tagged for testing. Please give it a run and provide feedback. If nothing against it shows up, we'll tag it for release on Friday. Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, the following packages from oVirt 3.5.4 RC1 have been pushed to testing repositories: - qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.4.1 - vdsm-4.16.21-1.el7 You're welcome to test them[1] and provide feedback. [1] http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/oVirt Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com

Note that qemu-kvm-ev is built within Virt SIG too in kvm-common-testing CBS repo On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > Yes, you can. In fact you can use the binaries from the ovirt repo itself, > no need to rebuild. > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > ----- Original Message -----

hi, kvm-qemu-ev from virt7-kvm-common-release is now signed and available on buildlogs.centos.org for testing, the corresponding release file is available in the centos/7/extras/ location on buildlogs as well. Once we have some testing, we can push and announce via mirror.centos.org for wider adoption. Regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On 10/07/2015 07:07 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> hi, >> >> kvm-qemu-ev from virt7-kvm-common-release is now signed and available on >> buildlogs.centos.org for testing, the corresponding release file is >> available in the centos/7/extras/ location on buildlogs as well. >>

On 03/19/2015 12:23 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> following Cloud SIG example[1] I would like to start defining the CBS tags hierarchy for Virt SIG. >> >> For opening the discussion I suggest: >> >> - virt${release}-common : packages not related to xen or kvm, used

On 10/27/2015 09:16 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro > <mailto:nux at li.nux.ro>> wrote: > > Sandro, > > Could you please enumerate the actual technical differences between > stock qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev? > For example, what could one do with qemu-kvm-ev that cannot with >

Il 19/03/2015 15:46, George Dunlap ha scritto: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: >> On 03/19/2015 12:23 PM, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> following Cloud SIG example[1] I would like to start defining the