Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "qemu-kvm-ev update"
2018 Jan 04
1
[CVE-2017-5715] qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.13.1 is now available for testing
Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.13.1
<https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21119> is now available for
testing.
I'm testing it right now in oVirt CI, if nothing shows up, I'll tag it for
release in a few hours.
Here's the changelog:
* Thu Jan 04 2018 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> -
ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.13.1 - Removing RH branding from package name * Thu
2018 May 15
2
centos-qemu-ev repository not work for x86_64 arch on CentOS 7.5
On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:45:23 +0300 Gena Makhomed <gmm at csdoc.com> wrote:
> >> Something wrong with $contentdir variable,
> >> it points to altarch for x86_64 $basearch.
> >
> > can't reproduce on a fresh x86_64 installation. Adding Brian in case he has
> > a clue for this.
>
> I use fresh installed x86_64 CentOS 7.5 via VNC
> with
2018 May 15
2
centos-qemu-ev repository not work for x86_64 arch on CentOS 7.5
2018-05-15 14:39 GMT+02:00 Nerijus Baliunas <nerijus at users.sourceforge.net>:
> On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:18:08 +0200 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > >> I have freshly installed CentOS 7.5 on a Dell server, and
> > >> /etc/yum/vars/contentdir
> > >> contains 'altarch' too. CentOS 7.4->7.5 upgraded servers
2018 May 15
2
centos-qemu-ev repository not work for x86_64 arch on CentOS 7.5
2018-05-15 14:16 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>:
>
>
> 2018-05-15 13:53 GMT+02:00 Nerijus Baliunas <nerijus at users.sourceforge.net
> >:
>
>> On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:45:23 +0300 Gena Makhomed <gmm at csdoc.com> wrote:
>>
>> > >> Something wrong with $contentdir variable,
>> > >> it points to altarch
2018 May 15
3
centos-qemu-ev repository not work for x86_64 arch on CentOS 7.5
2018-05-15 12:38 GMT+02:00 Gena Makhomed <gmm at csdoc.com>:
> Hello, Sandro!
>
> On 15.05.2018 13:24, Gena Makhomed wrote:
>
> failure: repodata/repomd.xml from centos-qemu-ev: [Errno 256] No more
>> mirrors to try.
>> http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/
>> repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found
>>
>
>
2017 Jun 23
2
qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7_3.10.1 now available
Hi,
qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7.10.1
<https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=17495> has been tagged for
release and will soon be available on CentOS mirrors.
This release addresses a security issue (CVE-2017-7718) which has a
security impact rated important.
See https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhsa-announce/2017-June/msg00014.html
for more details on this update.
Here's the
2018 May 10
3
Difference between qemu-kvm-ev and qemu-kvm-ma?
I see with the introduction of CentOS 7.5 there's a new qemu-kvm-ma package
on ppc64le (which is actually newer than qemu-kvm-ev currently). Does
anyone know what the difference is between these two packages? We currently
use qemu-kvm-ev and we've run into this bug [1] which got me wondering if
we should be switching to that package on ppc64le.
Thanks!
[1]
2018 May 15
2
centos-qemu-ev repository not work for x86_64 arch on CentOS 7.5
Hello, Sandro!
On 11.05.2018 12:19, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
> Sadly, the new qemu-kvm-ev we prepared for CentOS 7.5 didn't get released (
> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14764) but the new build is ready.
After installing CentOS 7.5 and installing package qemu-kvm-ev
I can't install KVM on x86_64 arch:
command "yum -y install perf qemu-kvm-ev qemu-kvm-tools-ev
2017 Apr 19
1
qemu-kvm-ev ppc64le release builds
Hi,
We're using qemu-kvm-ev on ppc64le and I've noticed that it's included in
the extras repo for ppc64le but in the qemu-kvm-ev repo for x86_64. I also
noticed the version in ppc64le is lagging behind x86. I see that ppc64le is
being built for this, however isn't tagged for virt7-kvm-common-release and
thus showing up under /virt/kvm-common on the mirrors.
Is there any
2021 Mar 03
1
qemu-kvm-ev: usb: out-of-bounds r/w(CVE-2020-14364)
Hello
I saw that qemu-kvm-rhev has fixed the issue, but CentOS community hasn't updated the repaired version of qemu-kvm-ev;
will it be fixed in the future?
thanks
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/attachments/20210303/4b546109/attachment-0005.html>
2017 Sep 07
3
updating qemu-img-ev 2.6
Hello!
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common
Latest is now qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7.10.1.x86_64.rpm
while http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/7Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/
has qemu-kvm-rhev-2.6.0-28.el7_3.12.src.rpm
A few questions:
A) Does kvm-common have RPM builds from RHEV's SRPMS?
B) Is the plan to keep kvm-common up to date with RHEV?
// Johan Guldmyr
2018 Jun 22
2
Q: how can I request to add an upstream patch to resolve a core dump issue?
UPDATE: It turned out QEMU still dumped core with that patch applied.
That said, I'm still interested to know how to report issues with QEMU from centos-virt repo.
Thanks,
Ray
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xiong, Huan
> Sent: 2018?6?22? 11:12
> To: 'centos-virt at centos.org' <centos-virt at centos.org>
> Subject: Q: how can I request to add an upstream
2016 Apr 08
2
New qemu-kvm-ev available for testing
Hi,
qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.10.1 has been tagged for testing.
In order to test it, please enable centos-qemu-ev-test repository after
installing centos-release-qemu-ev
Thanks,
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2015 Oct 27
2
Differences between qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev
Sandro,
Could you please enumerate the actual technical differences between stock qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev?
For example, what could one do with qemu-kvm-ev that cannot with qemu-kvm?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo at redhat.com>
> To: "Discussion about
2015 Mar 20
2
CBS tags hierarchy
Il 19/03/2015 15:46, George Dunlap ha scritto:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:
>> On 03/19/2015 12:23 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> following Cloud SIG example[1] I would like to start defining the
2015 Oct 25
2
Differences between qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev
Hi all,
What are the real technical difference between qemu-kvm and
qemu-kvm-ev packages? What are the advantages to use qemu-kvm-ev (if
exists someone)?
Or qemu-kvm-ev makes sense when is used with ovirt only??
Thanks.
2017 Jan 25
4
qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7_3.3.1 tagged for testing
Hi,
the latest qemu-kvm-ev has been tagged for testing.
Please give it a run and provide feedback.
If nothing against it shows up, we'll tag it for release on Friday.
Thanks,
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2015 Nov 02
1
Differences between qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev
On 10/27/2015 09:16 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro
> <mailto:nux at li.nux.ro>> wrote:
>
> Sandro,
>
> Could you please enumerate the actual technical differences between
> stock qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev?
> For example, what could one do with qemu-kvm-ev that cannot with
>
2015 Jul 30
2
qemu-kvm-ev with CentOS 7.1
Note that qemu-kvm-ev is built within Virt SIG too in kvm-common-testing
CBS repo
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote:
> Yes, you can. In fact you can use the binaries from the ovirt repo itself,
> no need to rebuild.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -----
2017 Jan 26
1
qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7_3.3.1 tagged for testing
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote:
> On 01/24/2017 11:29 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> the latest qemu-kvm-ev has been tagged for testing.
>> Please give it a run and provide feedback.
>> If nothing against it shows up, we'll tag it for release on Friday.
>>
>> Is it considered normal for the test