similar to: qemu-kvm-ev questions

hi, kvm-qemu-ev from virt7-kvm-common-release is now signed and available on buildlogs.centos.org for testing, the corresponding release file is available in the centos/7/extras/ location on buildlogs as well. Once we have some testing, we can push and announce via mirror.centos.org for wider adoption. Regards, -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh

Note that qemu-kvm-ev is built within Virt SIG too in kvm-common-testing CBS repo On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> wrote: > Yes, you can. In fact you can use the binaries from the ovirt repo itself, > no need to rebuild. > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > ----- Original Message -----

Hi, We're using qemu-kvm-ev on ppc64le and I've noticed that it's included in the extras repo for ppc64le but in the qemu-kvm-ev repo for x86_64. I also noticed the version in ppc64le is lagging behind x86. I see that ppc64le is being built for this, however isn't tagged for virt7-kvm-common-release and thus showing up under /virt/kvm-common on the mirrors. Is there any

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On 10/07/2015 07:07 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > >> hi, >> >> kvm-qemu-ev from virt7-kvm-common-release is now signed and available on >> buildlogs.centos.org for testing, the corresponding release file is >> available in the centos/7/extras/ location on buildlogs as well. >>

On 31.07.2015 10:19, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248758 > Have you checked 3.5.4 RC or CentOS Virt SIG[2] > to see if the bug has been fixed in latest qemu-kvm-ev ? > > [1] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5-pre/ > [2] http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-kvm-common-testing/x86_64/os/ Patch mjt-set-oem-in-rsdt-like-slic.diff

Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.13.1 <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21119> is now available for testing. I'm testing it right now in oVirt CI, if nothing shows up, I'll tag it for release in a few hours. Here's the changelog: * Thu Jan 04 2018 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> - ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.13.1 - Removing RH branding from package name * Thu

Sandro, Could you please enumerate the actual technical differences between stock qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev? For example, what could one do with qemu-kvm-ev that cannot with qemu-kvm? Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sandro Bonazzola" <sbonazzo at redhat.com> > To: "Discussion about

On 03/20/2015 10:42 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: >>>>>> For opening the discussion I suggest: >>>>>> >>>>>> - virt${release}-common : packages not related to xen or kvm, used by at least 2 projects >>>>>> - virt${release}-xen : xen hypervisor related packages >>>>>> - virt${release}-kvm : kvm hypervisor

Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.3.0-31.el7_2.10.1 has been tagged for testing. In order to test it, please enable centos-qemu-ev-test repository after installing centos-release-qemu-ev Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 03/19/2015 02:46 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: >> On 03/19/2015 12:23 PM, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> following Cloud SIG example[1] I would like to start defining the CBS

Hi all, What are the real technical difference between qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev packages? What are the advantages to use qemu-kvm-ev (if exists someone)? Or qemu-kvm-ev makes sense when is used with ovirt only?? Thanks.

On 30.07.2015 15:25, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Note that qemu-kvm-ev > is built within Virt SIG too in kvm-common-testing CBS repo Packages from kvm-common-testing probably is not a good choice for using in production environment. I found in internet package http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-kvm-common-release/source/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.3.1.src.rpm

2018-05-15 12:38 GMT+02:00 Gena Makhomed <gmm at csdoc.com>: > Hello, Sandro! > > On 15.05.2018 13:24, Gena Makhomed wrote: > > failure: repodata/repomd.xml from centos-qemu-ev: [Errno 256] No more >> mirrors to try. >> http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/ >> repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found >> > >

Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7.10.1 <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=17495> has been tagged for release and will soon be available on CentOS mirrors. This release addresses a security issue (CVE-2017-7718) which has a security impact rated important. See https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhsa-announce/2017-June/msg00014.html for more details on this update. Here's the

Hi, the latest qemu-kvm-ev has been tagged for testing. Please give it a run and provide feedback. If nothing against it shows up, we'll tag it for release on Friday. Thanks, -- Sandro Bonazzola Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. See how it works at redhat.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I see with the introduction of CentOS 7.5 there's a new qemu-kvm-ma package on ppc64le (which is actually newer than qemu-kvm-ev currently). Does anyone know what the difference is between these two packages? We currently use qemu-kvm-ev and we've run into this bug [1] which got me wondering if we should be switching to that package on ppc64le. Thanks! [1]

Hello, Sandro! On 11.05.2018 12:19, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Sadly, the new qemu-kvm-ev we prepared for CentOS 7.5 didn't get released ( > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14764) but the new build is ready. After installing CentOS 7.5 and installing package qemu-kvm-ev I can't install KVM on x86_64 arch: command "yum -y install perf qemu-kvm-ev qemu-kvm-tools-ev

On 10/27/2015 09:16 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro > <mailto:nux at li.nux.ro>> wrote: > > Sandro, > > Could you please enumerate the actual technical differences between > stock qemu-kvm and qemu-kvm-ev? > For example, what could one do with qemu-kvm-ev that cannot with >

On 30.07.2015 10:49, Nux! wrote: > Then you should definitely submit a bug with redhat about this, seems like a serious one. Ok, done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248758 P.S. As I can see - bugzilla.redhat.com for oVirt Product does not contain qemu-kvm-ev Component at all - looks like this is yet another bug - in the bugzilla settings. But I can't find how to report

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On 01/24/2017 11:29 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > >> Hi, >> the latest qemu-kvm-ev has been tagged for testing. >> Please give it a run and provide feedback. >> If nothing against it shows up, we'll tag it for release on Friday. >> >> Is it considered normal for the test