similar to: dns test 2

please ignore

Please ignore this test message

hi everybody I'm having I pretty regular setup, so I'd like to think. Guest network is to use passthrough and a DNS+DHCP on a neighbour system gets requests and then DHCP updates DNS records but with libvirt host's name instead of guest's. Am I missing something here? How do make a guest claim DNS update and the not host on which that guest is running? many thanks P.

Hello guys... I'm using libvirt in my local laboratory and I have a question/problem about DNS settings over dnsmasq (by libvirt) I have a NAT network separately from my real network, i need simulated some DNS hosts to NAT network like ftp.debian.org (for testing purposes, etc) This is for example a dumpxml (yes, i'm using PXE boot for testing and is working fine) <network>

On 03/13/2018 11:08 AM, Gionatan Danti wrote: > On 13/03/2018 15:30, Michal Privoznik wrote:> The default GW depends on > the IP address you assigned to your network: >> >> <ip address='192.168.122.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'/> >> >> This says the default GW is 192.168.122.1/24. However, you can insert >> other routes too: >>

Hi all, how I can set dhcp options as DNS, gateway, etc in libvirt's network definitions? From what I read here[1], I can use the <option> tag. However, I can not find nothing on libvirt official documentation. I am missing something? Thanks. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2013-March/msg00166.html -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it

Il 13-03-2018 20:48 Laine Stump ha scritto: > On 03/13/2018 11:08 AM, Gionatan Danti wrote: >> On 13/03/2018 15:30, Michal Privoznik wrote:> The default GW depends >> on >> the IP address you assigned to your network: >>> >>> <ip address='192.168.122.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'/> >>> >>> This says the default GW is

Hey, I've opened a bug against ubuntu at [1]. I realize this is probably not a high priority, but I was just curious if it is possible to have libvirt configure a network and *not* run a DNS server on it (dnsmasq). Perhaps I could convince libvirt to run dnsmasq with '--port 0'? For my explicit use case i was hoping/expecting to run my own dns and dhcp servers, possibly a

On 04/06/2014 08:33 AM, Johannes Kastl wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi everyone, > > maybe this is an old fart, but I cant get it to work. > > I am running libvirt on a laptop, where a dnsmasq is already running > to delegate dns info for my local (not-public) network. My resolv.conf > (on the host) lists the system-dnsmasq as first

On 04/10/2014 08:12 PM, Johannes Kastl wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10.04.2014 13:08 Laine Stump wrote: >> On 04/06/2014 08:33 AM, Johannes Kastl wrote: >>> There was a bug in libvirt for quite awhile that caused >>> locally-unresolved requests for hostnames in the domain given by >>> the network's <domain

Rowland, You're absolutely right - with '128' both DHCP servers listen and *may* reply, therefore besides failover provide load balancing. Even if both servers respond with *Offers* to the client, the client will select one and issue *one Request* to the selected server. E.g., below is a log records from my failover DHCP (192.168.0.2) server: May 17 00:09:37 s-dhcpd-2 dhcpd[1578]:

On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:10:22AM +0200, David Ayers wrote: >Hello, > >similar to how one can configure guest specific IP addresses via mac >addresses: ><ip address="192.168.122.1" netmask="255.255.255.0" localPtr="yes"> > <dhcp> > <range start="192.168.122.100" end="192.168.122.254"/> > <host

Hi all Do any of you know i can force asterisk to lookup ip addresses for peers and trunks everytime it tries to make a call. One of the peers has a dynamic ip and is using DynDNS to register host. Now i need to reload asterisk everytime i want to call it thanks liaan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection

Hello! Is there any way conrol dnsmasq which is started by libvirt? For example, i want to enlarge max lease time. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/attachments/20101121/d3e597e0/attachment.htm>

On 11/11/20 3:40 AM, Jörg Kastning wrote: > Hi @all, > > I'm having trouble to realize my use case and hope somebody could help me. > > # Use case > > For a home lab I want to deploy several guest domains. These domains > must not have a direct or NAT connection to the internet or my LAN. They > should only be able to reach my LAN and the internet through a

Hello everyone, TL;DR: Is ist possible to provide a secondary DNS (e.g. 8.8.8.8) via DHCP in addition to the gateway (in my case 10.0.1.1)? I use libvirt to manage all my qemu-based VMs. I have set up a local NAT-network which includes all my VMs (and some physical servers integrated via VPN). Everything works fine, but ocassionally, I have to restart the network (when I add instances for

On 03/12/2018 06:45 PM, Gionatan Danti wrote: > Hi all, > how I can set dhcp options as DNS, gateway, etc in libvirt's network > definitions? The default GW depends on the IP address you assigned to your network: <ip address='192.168.122.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'/> This says the default GW is 192.168.122.1/24. However, you can insert other routes too:

Hai , I am new to samba. I have configured samba 3 as PDC and when I add win2k client into my DC, the client says 'unable to find 'mydomain' name , may be due to DNS Issue. I have also configured bind as dns server and I have the forward & reverse records for 'mydomain'. I read that I need to add some SRV records for active directory clients(win2k/winxp). But I

On 13/03/2018 15:30, Michal Privoznik wrote:> The default GW depends on the IP address you assigned to your network: > > <ip address='192.168.122.1' netmask='255.255.255.0'/> > > This says the default GW is 192.168.122.1/24. However, you can insert > other routes too: > > <route address="192.168.222.0" prefix="24"

It has come to our attention that many, possibly even all, people with non-redhat.com email addresses are unable to send mail to most libvirt mailing lists, receiving bounce messages saying the address doesn't exist eg Final-Recipient: rfc822; libvirt-users@redhat.com Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Remote-MTA: dns; us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Invalid