similar to: What's the best way to make use of VLAN interfaces with VMs?

Hi Laine What you have suggested sounds eminently reasonable. Thanks for your advice. I'm going to give it a shot and report back. Richard On 11/27/19 1:38 PM, Laine Stump wrote: > On 11/26/19 11:07 PM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: >> Hello >> >> I have a problem with attaching VMs to a VLAN interface. >> >> Here is my setup: I have several physical hosts

Even more puzzling, I reverted back to the old configuration to confirm what I had seen and found that it works in one direction but not the other: i.e. from 192.168.0.110 to 192.168.0.120, but not the other way around. Must be something with my configuration....which I can follow up on. So, thanks again for your help. Richard On 12/3/19 11:36 AM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: > Laine >

On 11/26/19 11:07 PM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: > Hello > > I have a problem with attaching VMs to a VLAN interface. > > Here is my setup: I have several physical hosts connected by a physical > switch.  Each host has two NICs leading to the switch, which have been > combined into a team, team0. Each host a has a bridge br1, which has > team0 as a slave. So

Laine I made the change and I can now ping across both bridges: br1 (192.168.0.0/24) and br1600 (192.168.1.0/24): br1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500         inet 192.168.0.110  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.0.255         inet6 fe80::1e98:ecff:fe1b:276d  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>         ether 1c:98:ec:1b:27:6d  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)

Tried that as well, but this has to be something that gets set at the OS level and loaded, as if you look at dmesg output, you can see all the vnet?? nodes as the OS comes online. So the question is, what is virt-install doing that creates the needed vnet interface that is part of the bridge. I really had to kill and reload the VM just to load a second interface.. --- Howard Leadmon

How do you decide what MAC address to use for that VM interface? As I just tried to change the MAC to some other value close, like I made '52:54:00:34:e1:21' into say '52:54:00:34:e1:32', and when I try and load it in, I get the following: error: XML error: Attempted double use of PCI Address '0:0:4.0' Here is one of my network entries: <interface

On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:30:37 +0000, Ulrich Sibiller <ulrich.sibiller at atos.net> wrote: > Martin Schwenke schrieb am 15.02.2023 23:23: > > OK, this part looks kind-of good. It would be interesting to know how > > long the entire failover process is taking. > > What exactly would you define as the begin and end of the failover? From "Takeover run

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:49:49PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>>>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:49:49PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:56:48PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>>>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 06:56:35PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:49:49PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>>>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 06:56:35PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:58 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >>> Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:49:49PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >>>>On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Earl A Ramirez <earlaramirez at gmail.com> wrote: > I don't see 'System' in any of the CentOS 7.2.1511 boxes or VMs that were > recently upgraded: > ?Hi Earl, Have you tried a new install?? I agree, upgraded installations do not seem to be affected.

I am installed Xen 3.0 on a Fedora Core 4(2.6.12-1.1454_FC4xen0) machine. This machine is currently running one host domain: [root@]# xm list Name Id Mem(MB) CPU VCPU(s) State Time(s) Domain-0 0 128 0 1 r---- 49.1 fc4-vm1 1 63 0 1 -b--- 18.5 Following is the network configuration for Domain-0: eth0 Link

Hello everybody! Spse I have the following X <- seq(1:100) #(a dim(100) sequence of integers 1:100 representing the possible actions of player 1 and player2 in a game) BR2X<- br2(X) #(a dim(100) sequence of points on range (1,100) representing the best response function of player 2 to player 1:s actions) BR1X<- br1(X) #(a dim(100) sequence of points on range (1,100)

Maybe my google-fu is failing me, but I have spent the past couple hours looking at how to add a vnet? Device to my KVM host running CentOS 6, and for the life of me I can't get this going. >From all my research if I want to add a device I should just do 'brctl addif br1 vnet14' if I want to add a vnet14 to bridge br1. When I do this, I get: # brctl addif br0 vnet14

2015-11-14 16:43 GMT-03:00 Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>: > On 11/14/2015 09:20 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> I'd want to connect a VM to another VM (or eventually to the host) via the >> "Linux bridge" so that I can demonstrate that capability in a classroom >> with only one laptop. >> > > You don't actually need to

28.10.2016 23:32, Michal Privoznik пишет: On my host node i using system created bridge. example brctl show br1 bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br1 8000.0025907925d3 no eth1 vnet0 vnet2

Hi, I''m setting up my first xen machine, and I''m trying to setup two Virtual Machines, each mapped to a physical adapter on a different network. The virtual machine mapped to xen-br0 and eth0 works fine. However, when I bring up a VM with this configuration file: ----------------- name = "test77" kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.11.12-xenU" root =

[desktop] ----- lan ----eth0 [notebook] eth1 192.168.?.? ` ----- wlan ---- [speedport(hub and router)] -- internet 192.168.2.x So on my laptop I have eth0 beeing lan, eth1 beeing wlan ethernet card. When only using eth0/1 everything is fine. Now I want to be able to use internet from both [desktop] and [notebook]. Typically you set up a bridge with

Hi all, I have one bridge system (used for controlling bandwidth) connected to three different DSL ISP provider. I have the following setup below: - +-------------+ | br0 | | -> eth1 | -> DSL_1 | -> eth2 | +-------------+ | br1 | | -> eth3 | -> DSL_2 | -> eth4 | +-------------+ | br2 | | -> eth5