similar to: Problems with incoming multicasts

On 04/27/2018 06:39 PM, daggs wrote: > Greetings all, > > I have a host machine that runs a router within a vm. > I want to allow a connection between the host and the guest so the host can connect to the lan provided by the router vm. > I've created a dummy interface with these commands: > $ ip link add ens99-dummy type dummy > $ ip link set ens99-dummy address

On 04/30/2018 03:16 PM, daggs wrote: > Greetings Laine, > >> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 8:31 PM >> From: "Laine Stump" <laine@redhat.com> >> To: libvirt-users@redhat.com >> Cc: daggs <daggs@gmx.com> >> Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] connecting host and guest vm using a dummy nic >> >> On 04/27/2018 06:39 PM, daggs wrote:

Hi, Im very new to virtualization on Linux, wanting to kick the tires some, and am wondering where best to go next. Right now, ive done the 'all in one install' of ovirt 3.4 on a single fedora 19 machine. Its a desktop with a wifi network interface, and im trying to set up the kvm hypervisor in combination with macvtap. Any pointers to docs on what best to do next is appreciated. Im

I have a host setup for libvirt kvm/qemu vms. And I wonder a bit about the overhead of the macvtap and how to configure the mtu's properly. To be able to communicate with the host, I have moved the ip address of the host from the adapter to a macvtap to allow host communication. I have the below setup on hosts.

Greetings Laine, > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2018 at 5:30 PM > From: "Laine Stump" <laine@redhat.com> > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Cc: daggs <daggs@gmx.com> > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] connecting host and guest vm using a dummy nic > > On 04/30/2018 03:16 PM, daggs wrote: > > Greetings Laine, > > > >> Sent: Monday, April 30,

Greetings Laine, > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 8:31 PM > From: "Laine Stump" <laine@redhat.com> > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Cc: daggs <daggs@gmx.com> > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] connecting host and guest vm using a dummy nic > > On 04/27/2018 06:39 PM, daggs wrote: > > Greetings all, > > > > I have a host machine that runs

The guest was setup through virt-manager. The machine is not configured much after a F20 install (I believe I didn't change any network things) Here is the network part: <interface type='direct'> <mac address='52:54:00:fe:b0:66'/> <source dev='em1' mode='bridge'/> <target dev='macvtap0'/> <model

(Please put your responses inline rather than top-posting) On 02/12/2014 10:07 AM, John Obaterspok wrote: > Hello, > I've setup a VM with default networking (NAT) and this works fine > but hosts on my LAN can't get to the VM since it uses NAT. > > When I try to set network to use MacVTap with either default or > bridged I get no networking for the

Greetings all, I have a host machine that runs a router within a vm. I want to allow a connection between the host and the guest so the host can connect to the lan provided by the router vm. I've created a dummy interface with these commands: $ ip link add ens99-dummy type dummy $ ip link set ens99-dummy address 52:54:00:1f:d0:ff this resulted with this output: $ ifconfig ens99-dummy

Hi buddylove, In addition to the links Philipp provided you, here is some more reading which will hopefully help you better understand the difference between multicast and unicast communications: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicast https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicast Cheers, Jordan On 05/04/2016 06:39 AM, buddylove wrote: > @Phil > nice text... > just want to mention (or

Oh, well by your "In the end... its the same..." statement and your question of what the difference is (and mentioning connection tracking which is a completely different subject), I was a bit confused as to your query. Cheers, Jordan On 05/04/2016 09:55 AM, buddylove wrote: > I was already aware if this in the first place :-) > > On 04.05.2016 18:04, Jordan Erickson wrote:

if you read ahead you'll figure that the infrastructure of the network 'en gros' isn't made for it (yet). because of this (and not just because I am a fan of) I propose other trials with overlay networks which could (under proper application) even be more efficient than the multicast protocol(s) itself. Greets and out Gee ... .-. . . On 04.05.2016 18:04, Jordan Erickson wrote:

also, does unicast individually send out streams to each listener (requiring lots of bandwidth) or does it broadcast a stream and users can "tap in" (low bandwidth)? -------Original Message------- From: "Dan Chokola (webmail)" <teckyd at earthlink.net> Sent: 02/28/03 10:46 PM To: icecast at xiph.org Subject: [icecast] Multicast/Unicast > > what does icecast use?

Good morning, On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 00:15 +0200, Fran Delgado wrote: > Hi, there! > I have a doubt about if this server supports unicast, multicast or > both. I was looking for information in the web but I couldn't found > anything. Anyone can help me? Icecast2 is a streaming solution that works using HTTP[0]. (HTTPS is also supported using both methods[1].) HTTP uses TCP[2][3]

I was already aware if this in the first place :-) On 04.05.2016 18:04, Jordan Erickson wrote: > Hi buddylove, > > In addition to the links Philipp provided you, here is some more reading > which will hopefully help you better understand the difference between > multicast and unicast communications: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicast >

Hi. I'm proposing a wireless distribution system in infraestructure mode for a valley with no cables and distant houses, respect to Asterisk, I can get a company I work with to provide me with E1 and use LCR to get 4 different telcos based on prefix. I've been reading a very interesting paper about voip on wireless, i recommend it really

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795 Summary: RELATED doesn't accommodate multicast UDP solicitation resulting in unicast reply Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

On 04/05/2016 03:48 πμ, buddylove wrote: > you have 'a' doubt? > precise your question or do you want to make a quiz here? > > this is f.... icecast and it's a damn good piece of software. > runs like a honey down the nipple, up to 8 streams simultaneously > including shoutcast. > read the docs! > > > > On 04.05.2016 00:15, Fran Delgado wrote: >>

I am running Fedora 16 64bit and installed libvirt. I have the VM running with arm emulation with this one issue I can't figure out. I used Virtual Machine Manager to manage the VM and can access its console there. The Ethernet appears to be eth1 and the guest can set an IP on it etc. However, I cannot see any traffic from the Host when dumping any of the interfaces. I've tried

Hi All, As it is written in the "Linux 2.4 Advanced Routing HOWTO" GRE tunneling has some benefits compare to IP-in-IP, on of it benefits is the ability to transport multicast traffic through a GRE tunnel. I used the mrouted daemon and I know that the daemon supports tunneling but I don''t want to use its tunneling method. Assuming I have gre0 as my tunneling device I did the