similar to: Lib virt v4.x packages for Xenial

On 08/14/2018 06:42 AM, Ulrich KELLER wrote: > I?m not using the PPA, but the CRAN mirror from https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/#installation: > > deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu xenial-cran35/ > > On 14 Aug 2018, at 12:25, George N. White III <gnwiii at gmail.com<mailto:gnwiii at gmail.com>> wrote: > > qOn Tue, 14 Aug 2018 at 05:04,

The old (3.4) repo has the same version or rpart (with the same package filename), which I assume was the version installed on my machine prior to my upgrade to 3.5. I guess apt didn?t upgrade because there was no version change. Maybe the debian_revision part of the version could be bumped to make sure the rebuilt packages are upgraded for people upgrading from the 3.4 repo? > On 16 Aug 2018,

On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 at 03:15, Ulrich KELLER <ulrich.keller at uni.lu> wrote: > The old (3.4) repo has the same version or rpart (with the same package > filename), which I assume was the version installed on my machine prior to > my upgrade to 3.5. I guess apt didn?t upgrade because there was no version > change. Maybe the debian_revision part of the version could be bumped to

On 4/27/20 6:46 PM, Stanley Lan wrote: > Starting 4/27/2020 I started having issues installing r-base/dev packages on unbuntu 16.04. > > Here are the commands I used based on > https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/README.html > > echo "deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu xenial-cran35/" | sudo tee -a /etc/apt/sources.list > gpg --keyserver

I manually downloaded the rpart package and installed it using dpkg, without removing the old rpart package first, and now everything works. During the installation, dpkg said: Unpacking r-cran-rpart (4.1-13-1cran1xenial0) over (4.1-13-1cran1xenial0) So again, it seemed that the new version had been installed, but it really wasn?t. I had no idea that something like this could happen. Huh.

I?m not using the PPA, but the CRAN mirror from https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/#installation: deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu xenial-cran35/ On 14 Aug 2018, at 12:25, George N. White III <gnwiii at gmail.com<mailto:gnwiii at gmail.com>> wrote: qOn Tue, 14 Aug 2018 at 05:04, Ulrich KELLER <ulrich.keller at uni.lu<mailto:ulrich.keller at

We encountered a weird problem today, and I thought some of you might like to hear the solution. The underlying change was listed in the 7.4 changelog, so it's not a bug, but it may drive you buggy. The majority of our HPC cluster nodes run CentOS 7, though the exact patch levels vary from node to node. None is older than 7.3, but a few newer nodes were kickstarted right to 7.4. The

Just did a greenfield install for a new Replication 2 + arb cluster from ppa:gluster/glusterfs-3.12 on U16 LTS (Xenial) It install cleanly and easily except it was missing virt group file (or any group) in /var/lib/glusterd/groups I grabbed an older virt file from another cluster and used that. It was composed of: performance.quick-read=off performance.read-ahead=off

Hello, Side question... would this have anything to do with 16.04 being new and (potentially) "less stable" than 14.04? Or put another way, would this issue come up under 14.04? Thank you, Erol Biceroglu On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Atakan Okan <atakanokan at outlook.com> wrote: > Thanks for the reply Mr. Eddelbuettel. However I somehow couldn't manage > to

Starting 4/27/2020 I started having issues installing r-base/dev packages on unbuntu 16.04. Here are the commands I used based on https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/README.html echo "deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu xenial-cran35/" | sudo tee -a /etc/apt/sources.list gpg --keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com:80 --recv-keys

Over a week ago (on r-help, my bad!) I raised a question of why the ubuntu install instructions https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/README.html instruct users with a xenial-based system to use deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu xenial-cran40/ Looking at https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/ there is no xenial-cran40 directory. However,

Thanks for the reply Mr. Eddelbuettel. However I somehow couldn't manage to solve the problem completely. So I cleaned the sources.list file so taht the output is this: sudo apt-get update Hit:1 http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease Hit:2 http://tr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates InRelease???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Hit:3

Hi, I am running a dual-booted Ubuntu 16.04 from a USB stick and having problems installing R. I have been following the steps at this site: https://www.datascienceriot.com/how-to-install-r-in-linux-ubuntu-16-04-xenial-xerus/kris/ Below is the the output and the commands from the terminal: sudo echo "deb http://cran.rstudio.com/bin/linux/ubuntu xenial/" | sudo tee -a

It appears that there was an out-of-band patch from Samuel Thibault: https://salsa.debian.org/pkg-llvm-team/llvm-toolchain/blob/7/debian/patches/D54378-hurd-triple.diff Although the patch was approved here https://reviews.llvm.org/D54378 Is this patch going to land in 7.0.1 or 8? kristopher > Here's further proof: > > wget >

Hello, I just upgraded my Ubuntu Xenial system to R 3.5.1 (from 3.4.?) by changing the sources.list entry and doing an "apt-get dist-upgrade". Everything works except loading the rpart package in R: > library(rpart) Error: package or namespace load failed for ?rpart?: package ?rpart? was installed by an R version with different internals; it needs to be reinstalled for use with

I have recently re-installed R on my Ubuntu system to get R 3.5 and found this to have worked: # you may need to remove incumbent repos e.g. with: sudo apt-add-repository --remove ppa:marutter/rrutter # add new repos sudo apt-add-repository ppa:marutter/rrutter3.5 # for base R sudo apt-add-repository ppa:marutter/c2d4u4.5 # for pkgs - this saved me lots of time installing my set-up At the end

On 13 June 2018 at 20:54, Robin Lovelace wrote: | I have recently re-installed R on my Ubuntu system to get R 3.5 and found | this to have worked: | | # you may need to remove incumbent repos e.g. with: | sudo apt-add-repository --remove ppa:marutter/rrutter | | # add new repos | sudo apt-add-repository ppa:marutter/rrutter3.5 # for base R | sudo apt-add-repository ppa:marutter/c2d4u4.5 # for

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:45:19AM +0530, P J P wrote: > Hello, > > I created an Ubuntu 16.04 Xenial guest using virt-builder(1) with > > # virt-builder ubuntu-16.04 > -o /var/lib/libvirt/images/ubuntu-16.04.qcow2 > --size 10G --format qcow2 > --firstboot-command 'dpkg-reconfigure openssh-server' > --arch x86_64 > >

Who maintains apt.llvm.org? On 11/27/18 9:25 AM, Andrew Kelley wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Andrew Kelley <superjoe30 at gmail.com> > Date: Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:38 AM > Subject: apt.llvm.org has the wrong binaries/headers for llvm-toolchain-xenial-7 > To: LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > > > This build worked on Nov 24 and

CentOS 7.4 client mounting a CentOS 7.4 server filesystem over nfs4. nfs seems to be much slower since the upgrade to 7.4, so I thought it might be nice to mount the directory as v4.0 rather than the new default of v4.1 to see if it makes a difference. The release notes state, without an example: "You can retain the original behavior by specifying 0 as the minor version" nfs(5)