similar to: Connectivity between Guest and Host

Hello everyone, I have followed this guide to enable my Windows 10 guest to reach my Arch Linux host: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Virtualization_Host_Configuration_and_Guest_Installation_Guide/App_Macvtap.html My VM now has 2 NICs: - macvtap (VEPA) - virtual network 'isolated' I have statically assigned the IP 192.168.254.2 to my

Dear All, I am trying to enable router mode of tinc on Windows 7 platform. Although I have enabled the router mode and IP routing in Windows 7 PC (Network A Server). The PC B is still unable to connect the Network A and PC A. But the Network A and PC A is able to communicate each other via tinc. Please help and advise me any incorrect of that. Network A server Real - LAN adapter IP:

Hi, here it attached my smb.conf and Winbind debug log after reboot. My OS is Debian Jessie and has a fixed ip. Thank you On 06/06/2016 22:05, Rowland penny wrote: > On 06/06/16 14:52, Alexis RIES wrote: >> Hello, >> >> After each reboot, my Samba AD member server lost domain join after >> reboot, I have to re-enter the server in the domain with the "net ads

Hi, You will find attached the output of "net ads testjoin -d4" and "-d3". Yes replication seems to work properly. Alexis. On 07/06/2016 18:55, lingpanda101 at gmail.com wrote: > On 6/7/2016 12:31 PM, Alexis RIES wrote: >> I was wrong, the problem persists, it is not because of the DNS. >> You have the same configuration as me, but with two domains controller

Hello all, We have a Mandrake 10.1 server with Samba 3.0.13. The box has 2 NICs, 2 IPs and our DNS servers have both entries (same name for 2 IPs). Since kerberos is not working around here (tried to fix it for about 3 weeks, then gave up) I found my workaround: I use NetBIOS alias for my server, all clients use this alias for samba access and they authenticate thgrough SSPI. My problem is that

Scenario: Our Asterisk 13 PBX (on network 192.168.254.0/24, bound to 192.168.254.1:5060) is behind a NAT, acting as a client to our ITSPs SIP server. But also, this Asterisk is server for various VoIP telephones. Acoording to Asterisk's wiki, the transport section of pjsip.conf is configured as follows: ; Transport via UDP [transport-nat-udp] type= transport

Hi, I have a Linux machine with kernel 2.6 and 3 network cards. I would like to ask what rules should I have in the routing table so that: 192.168.254.0/25 is routed through eth1 192.168.254.128/25 is routed through eth2 eth0 is my internal interface and eth1/eth2 are the external interfaces. * What is particulary specific for this case is that ipaddr_eth1 is in the same network as ipaddr_eth2

Hello * community, I have 2 * boxes spanning a t1 with hdlc. I'm trying to route packets so people on a subnet seperate of the * boxes can browse the boxes on the * spanned subnet. The * boxes and the boxes on subnet controlled by * can see everything. The boxes on the seperate subnet inside the company can only see so far as the first * box and can't ping across the span.

Gents, first of all thanks for tinc, and thanks in advance for your advice. At the risk of revealing my stupidity and opening myself to ridicule.... I am trying to connect a new remote lan into an existing tinc vpn with the central tinc vpn server located at 10.57.132.1 on the 10.57.132.0/24 subnet. I set up this central tinc vpn server myself along with several other remote lans linked to

On 05/01/2018 12:12 PM, daggs wrote: > > I want to see if I understood you correctly, I add: > <interface type='ethernet'> > <model type='e1000'/> > </interface> > to the vm's xml, this will result in a new nic in the vm which and in the host which I can use by the host to request dhcp from the router within the vm? > Yes. As long

Hi, The private adresses (192.168.254.0/255.255.255.0) of my network are sent dynamically by dhcp on my network. The dhcp server is on the firewall which address is 192.168.254.1/255.255.255.255 (this address is static). I''ve got a rsync server on this network which is on a separe server. His address is 192.168.254.200/255.255.255.255 (this address is static). I want that the users

Hi, This is the first time I write to the list. My english is not so good, but I hope I''ll be understood. I have 4 adsl routers, plugged on a linux box, and this box e used to connect to a local network. The linux box has 5 NICs. eth0: local network inet 10.0.0.56/24 brd 10.0.0.255 scope global eth0 eth1: adsl router 1 inet 192.168.254.1/24 brd 192.168.254.255 scope global

On 05/02/2018 12:05 PM, daggs wrote: > Greetings Laine, > >> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2018 at 5:56 PM >> From: "Laine Stump" <laine@redhat.com> >> To: libvirt-users@redhat.com >> Cc: daggs <daggs@gmx.com> >> Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] connecting host and guest vm using a dummy nic >> >> On 05/01/2018 12:12 PM, daggs wrote:

Hello everybody. Recently i moved external interface to zone "external" on my home server/router. And something strange is hapening. From my router (chamber, CentOS7) everything is fine: [root at chamber ~]# firewall-cmd --list-all home (default, active) interfaces: enp3s0 tun0 virbr0 sources: services: dhcp dhcpv6-client dns http https imaps ipp-client mdns nfs samba

Greetings Laine, > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2018 at 5:56 PM > From: "Laine Stump" <laine@redhat.com> > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Cc: daggs <daggs@gmx.com> > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] connecting host and guest vm using a dummy nic > > On 05/01/2018 12:12 PM, daggs wrote: > > > > I want to see if I understood you correctly, I add: >

I think I found my problem, when configuring my second domain controller, I have created by mistake a round robin DNS entry on "Forward Lookup Zones -> ad.samdom.local". I speak of round-robin because I have two fields A pointing to the same domain Now I'm lost, you have a second domain controller in failover? If so, could you give me your DNS configuration? I need information

I have a setup with two Internet providers. One circuit (net0 == eth1) is used primarily for employees and tunnels to other sites. The other (net1 == eth2) is for the production machines that customers access. Everythung works in teh sense that packets get to where they are sent (mostly) but I recently I had a sniffer on the system and noticed a problem I cannot solve. traffic coming in

Greetings Laine, > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2018 at 8:09 PM > From: "Laine Stump" <laine@redhat.com> > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Cc: daggs <daggs@gmx.com> > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] connecting host and guest vm using a dummy nic > > On 05/02/2018 12:05 PM, daggs wrote: > > Greetings Laine, > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, May 02,

On Thursday 21 of April 2016 9:08:09 AM Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/21/2016 03:11 AM, Marcin Trendota wrote: > > But from host in another location (connected through VPN): > What host serves the VPN? If it's another host, how is that host > connected to the router? If it's "chamber," what type of VPN is it? It's OpenVPN on chamber. I've just noticed

Hi When I start shorewall, the multicast stream is stopped. My config: Windows VLC Client-----eth0:192.168.254.1/24--fw---eth1:191.168.254.254/16-------------------------Linux VLC Streaming server 192.168.254/24 lan wan (but it''s really a internal lan !) 191.168.1.21/16 on the FW/shorewall route add -net 224.0.0.0 netmask