similar to: Domain cannot talk to itself unless virbr0 is in promiscuous mode

Hi, On 16/09/15 09:13, David Raison wrote: > I have found how to request a ticket on a Linux box [0], but not when or > how this is done on Windows clients. > Would I have to make it rejoin the domain? To have a follow up to this thread: Having left and tried to rejoin the domain, I found the client was unable to rejoin it. I got some random error message that just said it couldn't

Hi, I've some problems with this network : [ host1 eth0: 10.22.2.4/8 ] [ host2 eth0:10.22.2.5/8 default route host3] \ / SWITCH internet | | |

Hello everybody, I have an odd problem with iptables using a Xen bridge setup. I don''t know if it would be better to post to netfilter Mailing-List. But I hope someone here know how to solve it. If it''s OT here, please let me know. I''ll try to do a little bit ASCII-Graphics to explain the topo better: _________ ________

Hi all, I have a strange problem with GPL PV 0.8.8 (0.6.4 did work). On my 2nd vif I cannot establish TCP connections. The 3rd IP packet (ACK from XEN-Image) is not forwarded by XEN/DOM0-Bridge. If I boot Windows without /GPLPV option, everything works fine. I did some investigation and found out that the packages arrive differently if GPLPV is enabled. "br_inet" is a bridge

Hi, I have a few questions about the inner workings of netfilter (a graphical layout of my network setup @ https://aequorin.homeunix.net:62389/local/media/network-graph.png) 1) These are the syslog entries for some simple connection tests. Shorewall/netfilter has been set to record all stateful connections SSH is recognized as phys(eth0) -> $FW traffic. This is because PHYSIN is

Hello All, I am trying to implement OpenVPN on Fedora core Linux 3 with the latest pathces installed. This server is used only as firewall/internet gateway/proxy/VPN server, with kernel 2.6.1-1.27.FC3 and kernel 2.6.1-1.27.FC3 SMP It has two NIC''s eth0 (10.0.0.150) connected to ADSL, eth1 (192.168.3.12) connected to the local network. I use shorewall 2.4 on this machine. I like to test

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=479 Summary: tunnel0 and br0 Product: iptables Version: 1.2.11 Platform: i386 OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy: tom@tomdeb.org I have a ipsec

Hi * in xend-config.xsp I have: ******************************** (network-script network-route) (vif-bridge xen-br0) (vif-script vif-bridge) ******************************** and in /etc/network/interfaces ********************************* iface eth0 inet static address 0.0.0.0 auto xen-br0 iface xen-br0 inet static pre-up ifconfig eth0 up pre-up brctl addbr xen-br0 pre-up brctl addif

Hello, I have the need to connect 2 remote site with vpn, the windows pc of the 2 site it can share the HD and printer. This is my configuration : LOCAL NETWORK A : ip from 192.168.10.2 to 192.168.10.99 | | | | eth0: 192.168.10.1 FIREWALL A : ( with debian ; openvpn ver. 2.0.beta15 ; shorewall ver 2.0.11 ) eth1 : xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx ( pubblic ip address ) | | | | INTERNET | | | eth1 :

I''m working on setting up a new router/server/etc. box. I''m using Proxmox as the base system (Debian Lenny basically). I''m trying to figure out the right way to configure Shorewall on it. I''ve looked at some of the bridging info but they seem to all be talking about single-interface setups. Could someone look over my setup and give me some input into the

Hello, I have started playing around with docker (https://www.docker.io/) and am having trouble to integrate the "docker0" bridge it creates on the fly into my shorewall setup (version 4.5.16.1) on debian testing. IP forwarding is on and I have defined a "doc" ipv4 zone and the interfaces has an entry like so, > doc docker0

Hi! As noted by Chris Rankin on a mail to netfilter-devel and to the linux-kernel mailing list (subject: 2.6.12: connection tracking broken?), there is a problem with the connection tracking of iptables when one of the interfaces is a bridge. On my tests here I have setup a connection between two machines using a real interface (eth0) and then the same setup using a bridge interface (br0) to

Dear Xen-Users, I use Xen 3.1.0_15042 on my OpenSuSE-10.3-computer. Without starting the xen-kernel I can connect my second computer via my native computer to the internet. After starting the xen-kernel the xen-bridge came automatically up. How can I configure the xen-bridge or the xen-devices? I get routing problems: Feb 20 18:31:36 intel6550 kernel: martian source 217.237.149.142 from

Hi All, My PXE configurations works fine for a bios PXE (the server in legacy mode) but hangs in an EUFI mode. Look like it can transfer the bootx64.efi but not the next one ldlinux.e64 Any ideas? Thanks Software> syslinux ver 6.3 atftp 7.1 Log server side >> Booting Embedded LOM 1 Port 1 : HP Ethernet 1Gb 4-port 331i Adapter - NIC (PXE IPv4) >> Booting PXE over

Hi, I am trying to set up a uPnP server on a Linux box (Debian Sarge Stable kernel 2.6.8). uPnP works using multicast packages for locating servers. This does however seem to fail unless I set the relevant NIC in promiscuous mode. If I do so, it works well. I have added ip route add 224.0.0.0/4 dev eth0 and echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward and the kernel is set up to enable

Hi, I saw a nice mail about bridging in Xen at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.user/9538. Can I ask you a quick question? I''ve set up bridge-networking for Xen 3.0and networking was being done properly for Dom0 and DomUs. However, I noticed that Dom0 receives a lot of network interrupts or network packets even when they were not actually meant for either Dom0 or DomU.

Author: prafull Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 95c55f804e6251aa87677ff29f6de677f407d04d Log message: 6375481 eri driver doesn''t reset promiscuous mode correctly (fix lint) Files: update: usr/src/uts/sun/io/eri.c

Hi all, I am trying to enable promiscuous mode on a kvm switch due to sniff all traffic using snort installed on a kvm guest. I have found a partial solution configuring this bridge with "brctl setaging br0 0", but all vms sees all traffic. I think the soultion is using ebtables but I didn't found any doc about how can I do under kvm (and upstream recommends disable this

As a heads up to everyone, VMware requires you to take special precautions when trying to put a virtual nic into promiscuous mode, which is required for Xen networking to work. I spent a fair amount of time diagnosing Xen network problems when it wasn''t Xen at all. As I was just beginning to learn Xen, I was convinced it was something I was doing wrong, when it wasn''t at

hi @all sometimes after a reboot the complete network is down the difference in the logs shows: in a failed reboot the eth0 does not entering promiscuous mode; in both cases the eth0 gets sucessful its ip configuration via dhcp - any idea ? the nic is a 3com 3c905C-TX/TX-M and the configuration is a suse 9.3 with xen-kernel 2.6.11.4-21.10-xen and xen 2.0.5.c ----------------[ failed reboot ]