similar to: [PATCH] Fix various -Wformat problems.

Updating gnulib has caused -Wformat-signedness to be enabled. This has revealed many problems in C format strings. The fixes here fall into the following main categories: - Using %d with an unsigned parameter. - %x and %o expect an unsigned argument. - uid_t and gid_t are unsigned on Linux. The safe way to print these is to cast them to uintmax_t and then print them using the %ju

Simple utility to list information about a files. The utility which does the same thing as "ls -la". This is a useful test program. Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey at gmail.com> --- usr/utils/Kbuild | 4 +- usr/utils/ls.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644

Simple utility to list information about a files. The utility which does the same thing as "ls -la". This is a useful test program. Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey at gmail.com> --- usr/utils/Kbuild | 4 +- usr/utils/minils.c | 198 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 201 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644

This is largely code motion. --- src/appliance.c | 40 +++++++----------------------------- src/guestfs-internal.h | 1 + src/tmpdirs.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/appliance.c b/src/appliance.c index 2cf6374..d293c2b 100644 --- a/src/appliance.c +++ b/src/appliance.c @@ -48,7 +48,7

Wherever we had code which did: if (something_bad) { perror (...); exit (EXIT_FAILURE); } replace this with use of the error(3) function: if (something_bad) error (EXIT_FAILURE, errno, ...); The error(3) function is supplied by glibc, or by gnulib on platforms which don't have it, and is much more flexible than perror(3). Since we already use error(3), there seems to be

GCC has two warnings related to large stack frames. We were already using the -Wframe-larger-than warning, but this reduces the threshold from 10000 to 5000 bytes. However that warning only covers the static part of frames (not alloca). So this change also enables -Wstack-usage=10000 which covers both the static and dynamic usage (alloca and variable length arrays). Multiple changes are made

Compiling krl.c with clang results in a slew of warnings like this one: /usr/src/secure/lib/libssh/../../../crypto/openssh/krl.c:505:37: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned long long' but the argument has type 'u_int64_t' (aka 'unsigned long') [-Wformat] This comes from incorrectly assuming that u_int64_t is defined as unsigned long long, whereas on

I added debuging as follows: /* no O_EXCL, existence check is via the fcntl lock */ lockfile_fd = open(lockfile_name.buf, O_NONBLOCK|O_CREAT|O_WRONLY, 0644); if (lockfile_fd == -1) { ret = errno; DEBUG(1, ("%s: open failed: %s\n", __func__, strerror(errno))); return ret; }

v2: - Fixes a number of bugs in corner cases. - Uses a 1M block size to fetch from the underlying plugin. This improves performance considerably. I also tested this much more thoroughly and can't find any more bugs. Rich.

Matt asked if xz should really be a filter rather than a plugin. The answer is yes, of course it should be! That's been something in the todo file for a while. The commit converts the xz plugin code into a filter (leaving the plugin around, but deprecating it). plugin: nbdkit xz file.xz filter: nbdkit --filter=xz file file.xz plugin: # can't be done filter: nbdkit

I''m looking to store the current params into a/some cookie(s). This works: @params.each_pair do |this_index, this_param| cookies[this_index] = this_param end Except, I get session-only cookies. This doesn''t work: @params.each_pair do |this_index, this_param| cookies[this_index] = { :value => this_param, :expires => 30.days.from_now } end

R-users E-mail: r-help@r-project.org Hi! R-users. http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/library/mvpart/html/xpred.rpart.html says: data(car.test.frame) fit <- rpart(Mileage ~ Weight, car.test.frame) xmat <- xpred.rpart(fit) xerr <- (xmat - car.test.frame$Mileage)^2 apply(xerr, 2, sum) # cross-validated error estimate # approx same result as rel. error from printcp(fit) apply(xerr, 2,

--- builder/index-parse.y | 6 ++++-- builder/index-parser-c.c | 3 ++- builder/index-struct.h | 1 + builder/ini_reader.ml | 6 +++--- builder/ini_reader.mli | 2 +- 5 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/builder/index-parse.y b/builder/index-parse.y index 310870d..7ddef53 100644 --- a/builder/index-parse.y +++ b/builder/index-parse.y @@ -150,12 +150,14 @@

Commit-ID: 858e50330e2c7834bb81095fb666fd08ff0d4869 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=858e50330e2c7834bb81095fb666fd08ff0d4869 Author: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> AuthorDate: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:04:44 +0800 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 02:57:21 +0000 [klibc] [BUILTIN] Remove

Commit-ID: bdfdde71b9ec8f4678f498445d38f5361bb08138 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=bdfdde71b9ec8f4678f498445d38f5361bb08138 Author: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> AuthorDate: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:04:44 +0800 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:54 +0000 [klibc] dash: [BUILTIN]

------------------- Version 2 of my problem improving the definition of what the optimal solution would be. Dear all, I'm working on the following problem: Assume two datasets: Y, Y that represent the same physical quantity Q. Dataset X contains values of Q after an event A while dataset Y contains values of Q after an event B. In R X, Y are vectors of the same length, containing

Thanks: Mykola Ivanets --- df/output.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/df/output.c b/df/output.c index eed7f384d..18f76b155 100644 --- a/df/output.c +++ b/df/output.c @@ -80,6 +80,22 @@ print_title (void) } } +/* scale (n, 4096, 1024) ==> n * 4 + * scale (n, 512, 1024) ==> n / 2 + */ +static uintmax_t +scale (uintmax_t

This is largely a simple refactoring, but it combines another definition of this function from virt-builder which had a slightly different prototype. --- builder/pxzcat-c.c | 20 +------------------- daemon/daemon.h | 18 ------------------ lib/guestfs-internal-all.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/builder/pxzcat-c.c

I am running my code in a loop and it does not work but when I run it outside the loop I get the values I want. n <- 1000; # Sample size fitglm <- function(sigma,tau){ x <- rnorm(n,0,sigma) intercept <- 0 beta <- 0 ystar <- intercept+beta*x z <- rbinom(n,1,plogis(ystar)) xerr <- x + rnorm(n,0,tau) model<-glm(z ~ xerr, family=binomial(logit))

I am new to R and I am trying to do a monte carlo simulation where I generate data and interject error then test various cut points; however, my output was garbage (at x equal zero, I did not get .50) I am basically testing the performance of classifiers. Here is the code: n <- 1000; # Sample size fitglm <- function(sigma,tau){ x <- rnorm(n,0,sigma) intercept <- 0 beta