similar to: [PATCH] Fix: buffer overflow during hvc_alloc().

From: Andrew Melnychenko <andrew at daynix.com> If there is a lot(more then 16) of virtio-console devices or virtio_console module is reloaded - buffers 'vtermnos' and 'cons_ops' are overflowed. In older kernels it overruns spinlock which leads to kernel freezing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786239 To reproduce the issue, you can try simple script that

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 12:06:45PM +0000, Nick Howitt wrote: > Hello Richard, > > I am using ClearOS7 (a Centos 7 derivative which also uses EPEL) and > am using various packages in the EPEL repository. I am interested in > seeing python3-libguestfs added to EPEL in order to use wok-3.0.0 > and kimchi-3.0.0. > > Would it be possible for you to maintain the package in

From: Andrew Melnychenko <andrew at daynix.com> If there is a lot(more then 16) of virtio-console devices or virtio_console module is reloaded - buffers 'vtermnos' and 'cons_ops' are overflowed. In older kernels it overruns spinlock which leads to kernel freezing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786239 Signed-off-by: Andrew Melnychenko <andrew at

> On 23 Dec 2019, at 11.57, Philip Colmer <philip.colmer at linaro.org> wrote: > > I'm trying to diagnose a really strange situation where certain emails, when submitted to the mailbox by Postfix, are not considered to be unseen by Dovecot. > > During testing, I've shut down anything else on the server that might want to access the mailbox. I submit the email to the

Hi! I'm a long time user of rsync, and a big fan. First of all; thanks for creating it and making it FOSS. I just thought of a feature that I think could be very useful, but I'm not familiar enough with the rsync code (and probably not skilled enough) to create it myself. So thought I'd just post it here in case someone gets a creative fit. :) Sometimes when I transfer files, there

With NAT, also with carrier grade NAT becoming more poplular with ISP's yet to move to IPv6, if you have a very popular stream you could end up kicking valid listners behind the same IP. On 23 December 2019 2:18:35 AM NZDT, Damian <db76 at riseup.net> wrote: >Hello fellow mailing list readers, > >My question relates to multiple / duplicate connections to the ice cast

I'm trying to diagnose a really strange situation where certain emails, when submitted to the mailbox by Postfix, are not considered to be unseen by Dovecot. During testing, I've shut down anything else on the server that might want to access the mailbox. I submit the email to the local postfix instance which then says it has delivered it to the mailbox: Dec 23 09:51:35 ip-10-35-194-108

I see. However, it is often pretty easy to see that a duplicate connection is the same listener because the time connected to the server of the two connections is the same. In that case, I am wondering which would be the one to kick. > On 22 Dec 2019, at 23:39, Gavin Stephens <gavin at stephens.net.nz> wrote: > > With NAT, also with carrier grade NAT becoming more poplular with

The Asterisk Development Team would like to announce the release of Asterisk 13.30.0. This release is available for immediate download at https://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk The release of Asterisk 13.30.0 resolves several issues reported by the community and would have not been possible without your participation. Thank you! The following issues are resolved in this release:

The Asterisk Development Team would like to announce the release of Asterisk 16.7.0. This release is available for immediate download at https://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk The release of Asterisk 16.7.0 resolves several issues reported by the community and would have not been possible without your participation. Thank you! The following issues are resolved in this release:

The Asterisk Development Team would like to announce the release of Asterisk 17.1.0. This release is available for immediate download at https://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk The release of Asterisk 17.1.0 resolves several issues reported by the community and would have not been possible without your participation. Thank you! The following issues are resolved in this release:

I am migrating an old dovecot 2.2.30 (macOS High SIerra, macO S Server) to a new server with dovecot 2.3.7 (macOS Mojave, macports). To get the data over, I?m trying to do a reverse backup with doveadm between an old and a new mail server, but failing to do so. I?m trying (from the new server, the old server is 192.168.2.67): doveadm -Dv \ -o imapc_host=192.168.2.67 \ -o imapc_user=gerben \

Do you know whether it has been fixed on the 8.0.1 release? Scott On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 9:45 AM Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at quicinc.com<mailto:kparzysz at quicinc.com>> wrote: The one blocking issue that existed in the past has been fixed. I haven’t had time to do any work on it lately, but I’m not aware of any fundamental problems that would make it not work on x86. --

Hello, I have a few general questions. 1. Whether the memory contents assigned for a function are accessible after we return from that function? If yes, how can we access it? 2. Does llvm delete the stackframe assigned for a specific function, after we return from that function? 3. If not, how can we delete the stackframe or clear the memory content after we return from the function? Where do

All, I need to run some legacy Windows software (32 bits) under my Linux box. I have installed wine from the source the 64 bits works fine but not the 32 bits. The ./configure gives ... *checking whether gcc -m32 works... no* *configure: error: Cannot build a 32-bit program, you need to install 32-bit development libraries.* and trying to install the require i686 packages results in a [

Hi Scott, That #1073741833 is a register mask. They are treated as aggregate registers (essentially sets of registers), so if it includes R9D and R11D, it will be treated as being aliased with both. These separate defs are there because they reach disjoint registers. -- Krzysztof Parzyszek kparzysz at quicinc.com<mailto:kparzysz at quicinc.com> AI tools development From: Scott

Hi David, Also consider using the mount option to specify backup server via 'backupvolfile-server=server2:server3' (you can define more but I don't thing replica volumes greater that 3 are usefull (maybe in some special cases). In such way, when the primary is lost, your client can reach a backup one without disruption. P.S.: Client may 'hang' - if the primary server got

>> So at a high level I think we should put the serialization and Instruction >> changes in sooner rather than later, giving us a largely undocumented[2] dialect >> of IR with opaque pointers that we can write tests against to upstream the rest >> of what I've done (and others can use to continue work in parallel if they're >> inclined). > > My,

Hello fellow mailing list readers, My question relates to multiple / duplicate connections to the ice cast server from the same IP address. I am well aware that this is an issue that lies with the music player (listener agent) used by the listener. When a listener connects to the stream, sometimes it appears as two connections to the stream from the same IP address. This may last only a few

(I'm still pretty concerned that there are IR changes going in for a feature that seems incomplete and more invasive than really seems justified to me - though I admit I'm clearly not paying enough attention to this feature to have a nuanced/fully informed opinion & so maybe I just need to step back from all of this - but given the addition of new intrinsics, it seems like there should