similar to: [PATCH 11/12] Documentation/x86: repointer docs to Documentation/arch/

Mostly due to x86 and acpi conversion, several documentation links are still pointing to the old file. Fix them. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung at kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa at the-dreams.de> Reviewed-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73 at gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma at redhat.com> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie at

Mostly due to x86 and acpi conversion, several documentation links are still pointing to the old file. Fix them. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung at kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa at the-dreams.de> Reviewed-by: Sven Van Asbroeck <TheSven73 at gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma at redhat.com> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie at

Mostly due to x86 and acpi conversion, several documentation links are still pointing to the old file. Fix them. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung at kernel.org> --- Documentation/acpi/dsd/leds.txt | 2 +- Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst | 6 +++--- Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 16 ++++++++--------

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:17:32PM +0200, Federico Vaga wrote: > On Thursday, May 30, 2019 1:23:53 AM CEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Mostly due to x86 and acpi conversion, several documentation > > links are still pointing to the old file. Fix them. > > For the Italian documentation I just send I patch to fix them in a dedicated > patch Acked-by: Michael S.

On Thursday, May 30, 2019 1:23:53 AM CEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Mostly due to x86 and acpi conversion, several documentation > links are still pointing to the old file. Fix them. For the Italian documentation I just send I patch to fix them in a dedicated patch > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung at kernel.org> > --- >

On Thursday, May 30, 2019 1:23:53 AM CEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Mostly due to x86 and acpi conversion, several documentation > links are still pointing to the old file. Fix them. For the Italian documentation I just send I patch to fix them in a dedicated patch > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung at kernel.org> > --- >

Mostly due to x86 and acpi conversion, several documentation links are still pointing to the old file. Fix them. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung at kernel.org> --- Documentation/acpi/dsd/leds.txt | 2 +- Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst | 6 +++--- Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 16 ++++++++--------

Em Mon, 3 Jun 2019 09:34:15 +0200 Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy at c-s.fr> escreveu: > Le 30/05/2019 ? 01:23, Mauro Carvalho Chehab a ?crit?: > > Mostly due to x86 and acpi conversion, several documentation > > links are still pointing to the old file. Fix them. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung at kernel.org> > > ---

Le 30/05/2019 ? 01:23, Mauro Carvalho Chehab a ?crit?: > Mostly due to x86 and acpi conversion, several documentation > links are still pointing to the old file. Fix them. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung at kernel.org> > --- > Documentation/acpi/dsd/leds.txt | 2 +- > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst | 6

Le 30/05/2019 ? 01:23, Mauro Carvalho Chehab a ?crit?: > Mostly due to x86 and acpi conversion, several documentation > links are still pointing to the old file. Fix them. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung at kernel.org> > --- > Documentation/acpi/dsd/leds.txt | 2 +- > Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.rst | 6

Fix several warnings and broken links. This series was generated against linux-next, but was rebased to be applied at docs-next. It should apply cleanly on either tree. There's a git tree with all of them applied on the top of docs/docs-next at: https://git.linuxtv.org/mchehab/experimental.git/log/?h=fix_doc_links_v2 Mauro Carvalho Chehab (21): ABI: sysfs-devices-system-cpu: point to

On 10/11/2017 3:30 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote: > Changes: > - patch v1: > - Simplify ftrace implementation. > - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. > - rfc v3: > - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce dynamic relocation space on > mapped memory. It also simplifies the relocation process. > - Move the start the module

On 10/12/2017 10:34 AM, Thomas Garnier wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> wrote: >> On 10/11/2017 3:30 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote: >>> Changes: >>> - patch v1: >>> - Simplify ftrace implementation. >>> - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. >>> - rfc

Hi folks, Firstly; apologies in advance for what is a head wrecker of keeping on top of the speculative mitigations and also if this is a duplicate email; my first copy didn't seem to make it into the archive. Also a disclaimer that I may have misunderstood elements of the below but please bear with me. I write this hoping to find out a bit more about the state of the relevant kernel

From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe at redhat.com> [ Upstream commit 083db6764821996526970e42d09c1ab2f4155dd4 ] The __raw_callee_save_*() functions have an ELF symbol size of zero, which confuses objtool and other tools. Fixes a bunch of warnings like the following: arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.o: warning: objtool: __raw_callee_save_xen_pte_val() is missing an ELF size annotation

From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe at redhat.com> [ Upstream commit 083db6764821996526970e42d09c1ab2f4155dd4 ] The __raw_callee_save_*() functions have an ELF symbol size of zero, which confuses objtool and other tools. Fixes a bunch of warnings like the following: arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.o: warning: objtool: __raw_callee_save_xen_pte_val() is missing an ELF size annotation

From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe at redhat.com> [ Upstream commit 083db6764821996526970e42d09c1ab2f4155dd4 ] The __raw_callee_save_*() functions have an ELF symbol size of zero, which confuses objtool and other tools. Fixes a bunch of warnings like the following: arch/x86/xen/mmu_pv.o: warning: objtool: __raw_callee_save_xen_pte_val() is missing an ELF size annotation

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 04:00:45PM -0800, Thomas Garnier wrote: > Minor changes based on feedback and rebase from v10. > > Splitting the previous serie in two. This part contains assembly code > changes required for PIE but without any direct dependencies with the > rest of the patchset. > > Note: Using objtool to detect non-compliant PIE relocations is not yet > possible

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 04:00:45PM -0800, Thomas Garnier wrote: > Minor changes based on feedback and rebase from v10. > > Splitting the previous serie in two. This part contains assembly code > changes required for PIE but without any direct dependencies with the > rest of the patchset. > > Note: Using objtool to detect non-compliant PIE relocations is not yet > possible

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky at amd.com> wrote: > On 10/11/2017 3:30 PM, Thomas Garnier wrote: >> Changes: >> - patch v1: >> - Simplify ftrace implementation. >> - Use gcc mstack-protector-guard-reg=%gs with PIE when possible. >> - rfc v3: >> - Use --emit-relocs instead of -pie to reduce dynamic