similar to: [PATCH] tpm: Add driver for TPM over virtio

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:26:10PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 06:14:02PM -0800, David Tolnay wrote: > > Add a config TCG_VIRTIO_VTPM which enables a driver providing the guest > > kernel side of TPM over virtio. > > > > Use case: TPM support is needed for performing trusted work from within > > a virtual machine launched by Chrome OS.

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 09:33:05PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 09:31:56PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:23:02AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:26:10PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 06:14:02PM -0800, David Tolnay wrote: > > > > >

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 06:14:02PM -0800, David Tolnay wrote: > Add a config TCG_VIRTIO_VTPM which enables a driver providing the guest > kernel side of TPM over virtio. > > Use case: TPM support is needed for performing trusted work from within > a virtual machine launched by Chrome OS. > > Tested inside crosvm, the Chrome OS virtual machine monitor. Crosvm's >

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 01:40:25PM -0800, David Tolnay wrote: > On 2/21/19 9:51 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 06:14:02PM -0800, David Tolnay wrote: > >> Add a config TCG_VIRTIO_VTPM which enables a driver providing the guest > >> kernel side of TPM over virtio. > >> > >> Use case: TPM support is needed for performing trusted

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 11:59:23PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 02:31:37PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 04:16:01PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 07:30:16AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 18:14 -0800, David Tolnay wrote: > > > > > Add a

On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 07:30:16AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2019-02-21 at 18:14 -0800, David Tolnay wrote: > > Add a config TCG_VIRTIO_VTPM which enables a driver providing the > > guest kernel side of TPM over virtio. > > What's the use case for using this over the current non-virtio vTPM?. > I always thought virtio was about guest to host transport

On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 12:36:34AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > I do not require spec quality documentation. Just a few paragraphs of > what is in crosvm, kernel etc. and something about inner workings to > get a rough idea. No need for TCG level spec for this :-) OTOH for virtio if there's no implementation in a popular hypervisor/language, we do ask for a somewhat detailed spec.

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:22 PM Alistair Delva <adelva at google.com> wrote: > > On devices without control virtqueue support, such as the virtio_net > implementation in crosvm[1], attempting to configure LRO will panic the > kernel: If you'd like to try using the control virtqueue, I have a WIP patch at crrev.com/c/1968200 The downside there is that when enabling IP

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> wrote: > acpi_evaluate_dsm() and friends take a pointer to a raw buffer of 16 > bytes. Instead we convert them to use uuid_le type. At the same time we > convert current users. > > acpi_str_to_uuid() becomes useless after the conversion and it's safe to > get rid of it. > > The

Each of these drivers has a copy of the same trivial helper function to convert the pointer argument and then call the native ioctl handler. We now have a generic implementation of that, so use it. Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com>

> On 5/16/19 10:35 PM, Pankaj Gupta wrote: > > Can I take it your reviewed/acked-by? or tested-by tag? for the virtio > > patch :)I don't feel that I have enough expertise to give the reviewed-by > > tag, but you can > take my acked-by + tested-by. > > Acked-by: Jakub Staron <jstaron at google.com> > Tested-by: Jakub Staron <jstaron at google.com>

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 01:22:07PM -0800, Alistair Delva wrote: > On devices without control virtqueue support, such as the virtio_net > implementation in crosvm[1], attempting to configure LRO will panic the > kernel: > > kernel BUG at drivers/net/virtio_net.c:1591! > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI > CPU: 1 PID: 483 Comm: Binder:330_1 Not tainted

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 01:22:07PM -0800, Alistair Delva wrote: > On devices without control virtqueue support, such as the virtio_net > implementation in crosvm[1], attempting to configure LRO will panic the > kernel: > > kernel BUG at drivers/net/virtio_net.c:1591! > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI > CPU: 1 PID: 483 Comm: Binder:330_1 Not tainted

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:08:41PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 4:22 PM Alistair Delva <adelva at google.com> wrote: > > > > On devices without control virtqueue support, such as the virtio_net > > implementation in crosvm[1], attempting to configure LRO will panic the > > kernel: > > > > kernel BUG at

On 1 February 2018 at 17:36, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for joining the party late. Had a broken finger and was > offline for a bunch of weeks (and a buif backlog afterwards ...). Hi, no problem, hope it's fine now. >> This is to allow clients running within VMs to be able to >> communicate with a compositor in the host. Clients

On 5/16/19 10:35 PM, Pankaj Gupta wrote: > Can I take it your reviewed/acked-by? or tested-by tag? for the virtio patch :)I don't feel that I have enough expertise to give the reviewed-by tag, but you can take my acked-by + tested-by. Acked-by: Jakub Staron <jstaron at google.com> Tested-by: Jakub Staron <jstaron at google.com> No kernel panics/stalls encountered during

On 5/16/19 10:35 PM, Pankaj Gupta wrote: > Can I take it your reviewed/acked-by? or tested-by tag? for the virtio patch :)I don't feel that I have enough expertise to give the reviewed-by tag, but you can take my acked-by + tested-by. Acked-by: Jakub Staron <jstaron at google.com> Tested-by: Jakub Staron <jstaron at google.com> No kernel panics/stalls encountered during

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 4:22 PM Alistair Delva <adelva at google.com> wrote: > > On devices without control virtqueue support, such as the virtio_net > implementation in crosvm[1], attempting to configure LRO will panic the > kernel: > > kernel BUG at drivers/net/virtio_net.c:1591! > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI > CPU: 1 PID: 483 Comm: Binder:330_1 Not

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 4:22 PM Alistair Delva <adelva at google.com> wrote: > > On devices without control virtqueue support, such as the virtio_net > implementation in crosvm[1], attempting to configure LRO will panic the > kernel: > > kernel BUG at drivers/net/virtio_net.c:1591! > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI > CPU: 1 PID: 483 Comm: Binder:330_1 Not

On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 09:21:43AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 8:11 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:08:41PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 4:22 PM Alistair Delva <adelva at google.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On devices without