On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 09:33:05PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen
wrote:> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 09:31:56PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 10:23:02AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 12:26:10PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 06:14:02PM -0800, David Tolnay
wrote:
> > > > > Add a config TCG_VIRTIO_VTPM which enables a driver
providing the guest
> > > > > kernel side of TPM over virtio.
> > > > >
> > > > > Use case: TPM support is needed for performing trusted
work from within
> > > > > a virtual machine launched by Chrome OS.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tested inside crosvm, the Chrome OS virtual machine
monitor. Crosvm's
> > > > > implementation of the virtio TPM device can be found in
these two source
> > > > > files:
> > > > >
> > > > > -
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/platform/crosvm/+/18ce5713e6cb99c40aafec52b67c28ba12a44f31/devices/src/virtio/tpm.rs
> > > > > -
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/platform/crosvm/+/18ce5713e6cb99c40aafec52b67c28ba12a44f31/tpm2/src/lib.rs
> > > >
> > > > These files/links do not make sense for kernel testing.
Please remove
> > > > them from the next version.
> > >
> > > To clarify generally for a virtio device we want
> > > - guest support
> > > - device support
> > > - spec
> > >
> > > If the device is implemented in qemu and guest in linux kernel,
> > > then there are lots of people familiar with these
> > > programming environments, so sometimes we merge
> > > guest and host code even if spec isn't written up at all.
> > >
> > > If you don't want to do that there's a small number of
people who can
> > > properly review code, e.g. I don't think lots of people on
this list are
> > > familiar with crosvm. One way to address this would be to build
a QEMU
> > > implementation. Another would be to write up a spec. You can do
both
> > > too :)
> >
> > I don't really understand your arguments.
>
> ... and I did your response total three times and did not find any
> causality of any sort from anything.
>
> /Jarkko
Thanks for spending the time reading my response. What was included in
it was a general suggestion for a virtio based driver to be acceptable
in upstream Linux.
You pointed out that a pointer to a prototype implementation in Rust
isn't relevant. However, FYI just posting guest code and asking for it
to be merged alone won't work for a virtio driver either. I am merely
trying to speed things up instead of having the contributor repost with
a tweaked commit log just to immediately get another set of nacks.
--
MST