similar to: [PATCH] virtio: release virtio index when fail to device_register

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[PATCH] virtio: release virtio index when fail to device_register"

2017 Nov 29
3
[PATCH] virtio: release virtio index when fail to device_register
index can be reused by other virtio device. Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping at didichuxing.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c index 48230a5..bf7ff39 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c @@ -333,6 +333,8 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct
2017 Nov 29
3
[PATCH] virtio: release virtio index when fail to device_register
index can be reused by other virtio device. Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping at didichuxing.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c index 48230a5..bf7ff39 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c @@ -333,6 +333,8 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct
2017 Nov 29
0
[PATCH] virtio: release virtio index when fail to device_register
On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:23:01 +0800 weiping zhang <zwp10758 at gmail.com> wrote: > index can be reused by other virtio device. > > Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping at didichuxing.com> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git
2017 Dec 01
3
[PATCH] virtio: release virtio index when fail to device_register
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:50:44AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:23:01 +0800 > weiping zhang <zwp10758 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > index can be reused by other virtio device. > > > > Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping at didichuxing.com> > > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> > > > --- >
2017 Dec 01
3
[PATCH] virtio: release virtio index when fail to device_register
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:50:44AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:23:01 +0800 > weiping zhang <zwp10758 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > index can be reused by other virtio device. > > > > Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping at didichuxing.com> > > Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> > > > --- >
2017 Dec 21
1
[PATCH v5 1/4] virtio: split device_register into device_initialize and device_add
In order to make caller do a simple cleanup, we split device_register into device_initialize and device_add. device_initialize always succeeds, so the caller can always use put_device when register_virtio_device faild. Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping at didichuxing.com> Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
2017 Dec 20
0
[PATCH v4 1/4] virtio: split device_register into device_initialize and device_add
In order to make caller do a simple cleanup, we split device_register into device_initialize and device_add. device_initialize always sucess, the caller can always use put_device when fail to register virtio_device no matter fail at ida_simple_get or at device_add. Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping at didichuxing.com> Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> ---
2017 Dec 20
2
[PATCH v4 1/4] virtio: split device_register into device_initialize and device_add
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:26:25 +0800 weiping zhang <zwp10758 at gmail.com> wrote: [you used a different mail address in your From: than in your s-o-b:; same for the other patches] > In order to make caller do a simple cleanup, we split device_register > into device_initialize and device_add. device_initialize always sucess, s/success/succeeds/ > the caller can always use
2017 Dec 20
2
[PATCH v4 1/4] virtio: split device_register into device_initialize and device_add
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:26:25 +0800 weiping zhang <zwp10758 at gmail.com> wrote: [you used a different mail address in your From: than in your s-o-b:; same for the other patches] > In order to make caller do a simple cleanup, we split device_register > into device_initialize and device_add. device_initialize always sucess, s/success/succeeds/ > the caller can always use
2017 Dec 20
8
[PATCH v4 0/4] use put_device to cleanup resource
Hi, The main change is split device_register into 2 sperate calls: device_initalize() and device_add, and then the caller can use put_device safety when fail to register_virtio_device. v3->v4: * split device_register into device_initialize and devicea_add that the caller can always use put_device when fail to register virtio device. v2->v3: * virtio: add new helper do get
2017 Dec 20
8
[PATCH v4 0/4] use put_device to cleanup resource
Hi, The main change is split device_register into 2 sperate calls: device_initalize() and device_add, and then the caller can use put_device safety when fail to register_virtio_device. v3->v4: * split device_register into device_initialize and devicea_add that the caller can always use put_device when fail to register virtio device. v2->v3: * virtio: add new helper do get
2017 Dec 17
0
[PATCH v3 5/5] virtio: add comments for virtio_register_device
As mentioned at drivers/base/core.c: /* * NOTE: _Never_ directly free @dev after calling this function, even * if it returned an error! Always use put_device() to give up the * reference initialized in this function instead. */ virtio_register_device may fail before/after call device_register, the caller should do a proper cleanup. Caller cann't use kfree directly, if virtio_register_device
2017 Dec 15
0
[PATCH v2 1/3] virtio_pci: use put_device instead of kfree
2017-12-15 3:13 GMT+08:00 Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 09:24:02PM +0800, weiping zhang wrote: >> As mentioned at drivers/base/core.c: >> /* >> * NOTE: _Never_ directly free @dev after calling this function, even >> * if it returned an error! Always use put_device() to give up the >> * reference initialized in this
2017 Dec 15
1
[PATCH v2 1/3] virtio_pci: use put_device instead of kfree
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 09:38:42AM +0800, weiping zhang wrote: > 2017-12-15 3:13 GMT+08:00 Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 09:24:02PM +0800, weiping zhang wrote: > >> As mentioned at drivers/base/core.c: > >> /* > >> * NOTE: _Never_ directly free @dev after calling this function, even > >> * if it returned an
2017 Dec 15
1
[PATCH v2 1/3] virtio_pci: use put_device instead of kfree
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 09:38:42AM +0800, weiping zhang wrote: > 2017-12-15 3:13 GMT+08:00 Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 09:24:02PM +0800, weiping zhang wrote: > >> As mentioned at drivers/base/core.c: > >> /* > >> * NOTE: _Never_ directly free @dev after calling this function, even > >> * if it returned an
2017 Dec 14
4
[PATCH v2 1/3] virtio_pci: use put_device instead of kfree
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 09:24:02PM +0800, weiping zhang wrote: > As mentioned at drivers/base/core.c: > /* > * NOTE: _Never_ directly free @dev after calling this function, even > * if it returned an error! Always use put_device() to give up the > * reference initialized in this function instead. > */ > so we don't free vp_dev until vp_dev->vdev.dev.release be
2017 Dec 14
4
[PATCH v2 1/3] virtio_pci: use put_device instead of kfree
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 09:24:02PM +0800, weiping zhang wrote: > As mentioned at drivers/base/core.c: > /* > * NOTE: _Never_ directly free @dev after calling this function, even > * if it returned an error! Always use put_device() to give up the > * reference initialized in this function instead. > */ > so we don't free vp_dev until vp_dev->vdev.dev.release be
2017 Dec 19
1
[PATCH v3 5/5] virtio: add comments for virtio_register_device
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:48:05 +0800 weiping zhang <zwp10758 at gmail.com> wrote: > As mentioned at drivers/base/core.c: > /* > * NOTE: _Never_ directly free @dev after calling this function, even > * if it returned an error! Always use put_device() to give up the > * reference initialized in this function instead. > */ > virtio_register_device may fail before/after call
2017 Dec 19
1
[PATCH v3 5/5] virtio: add comments for virtio_register_device
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 21:48:05 +0800 weiping zhang <zwp10758 at gmail.com> wrote: > As mentioned at drivers/base/core.c: > /* > * NOTE: _Never_ directly free @dev after calling this function, even > * if it returned an error! Always use put_device() to give up the > * reference initialized in this function instead. > */ > virtio_register_device may fail before/after call
2017 Dec 06
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] virtio_mmio: add cleanup for virtio_mmio_probe
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 19:57:10 +0800 weiping zhang <zhangweiping at didichuxing.com> wrote: > As mentioned at drivers/base/core.c: > /* > * NOTE: _Never_ directly free @dev after calling this function, even > * if it returned an error! Always use put_device() to give up the > * reference initialized in this function instead. > */ > > Normal we do cleanup for