similar to: [PATCH] vhost/vsock: fix uninitialized vhost_vsock->guest_cid

Hi Mike, url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Mike-Christie/vhost-fix-scsi-cmd-handling-and-cgroup-support/20201022-083844 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next config: i386-randconfig-m021-20201101 (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0 If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel

Since VSOCK already support mergeable rx buffer, so it can implement the balance with performance and guest memory, we can increase the sent pkt len to improve performance. And in order to be compatible with old version, so we still send max default rx buf size once. Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 33

VM sockets vhost transport implementation. This module runs in host kernel. Signed-off-by: Asias He <asias at redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 534 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/vhost/vsock.h | 4 + 2 files changed, 538 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/vsock.c create mode 100644 drivers/vhost/vsock.h diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c

From: Asias He <asias at redhat.com> VM sockets vhost transport implementation. This module runs in host kernel. Signed-off-by: Asias He <asias at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> --- v3: * Remove unneeded variable used to store return value (Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu at intel.com> and Julia Lawall <julia.lawall at

Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> writes: > From: Asias He <asias at redhat.com> > > VM sockets vhost transport implementation. This module runs in host > kernel. As per previous checkpatch comments. > > Signed-off-by: Asias He <asias at redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> > --- > v3: > * Remove

Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> writes: > From: Asias He <asias at redhat.com> > > VM sockets vhost transport implementation. This module runs in host > kernel. As per previous checkpatch comments. > > Signed-off-by: Asias He <asias at redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> > --- > v3: > * Remove

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 04:00:03PM +0800, Asias He wrote: > VM sockets vhost transport implementation. This module runs in host > kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Asias He <asias at redhat.com> Has any thought been given to how this affects migration? I don't see any API for an application to move to a different host and reconnect to a running vsock in guest. I think we could

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 04:00:03PM +0800, Asias He wrote: > VM sockets vhost transport implementation. This module runs in host > kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Asias He <asias at redhat.com> Has any thought been given to how this affects migration? I don't see any API for an application to move to a different host and reconnect to a running vsock in guest. I think we could

This reverts commit 0d76d6e8b2507983a2cae4c09880798079007421 and merge commit c402293bd76fbc93e52ef8c0947ab81eea3ae019, reversing changes made to c89359a42e2a49656451569c382eed63e781153c. The virtio-vsock device specification is not finalized yet. Michael Tsirkin voiced concerned about merging this code when the hardware interface (and possibly the userspace interface) could still change.

This reverts commit 0d76d6e8b2507983a2cae4c09880798079007421 and merge commit c402293bd76fbc93e52ef8c0947ab81eea3ae019, reversing changes made to c89359a42e2a49656451569c382eed63e781153c. The virtio-vsock device specification is not finalized yet. Michael Tsirkin voiced concerned about merging this code when the hardware interface (and possibly the userspace interface) could still change.

This patch will check the weight and exit the loop if we exceeds the weight. This is useful for preventing vsock kthread from hogging cpu which is guest triggerable. The weight can help to avoid starving the request from on direction while another direction is being processed. The value of weight is picked from vhost-net. This addresses CVE-2019-3900. Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at

On 2018/11/5 ??3:45, jiangyiwen wrote: > When vhost support VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF feature, > it will merge big packet into rx vq. > > Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> > --- > drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 + > include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 5

On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 05:29:31PM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: > When vhost support VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF feature, > it will merge big packet into rx vq. > > Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> I feel this approach jumps into making interface changes for optimizations too quickly. For example, what prevents us from taking a big buffer, prepending each chunk

On 2018/11/6 11:43, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/5 ??3:45, jiangyiwen wrote: >> When vhost support VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF feature, >> it will merge big packet into rx vq. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> >> --- >> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- >>

When vhost support VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF feature, it will merge big packet into rx vq. Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 5 ++ 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git

When vhost support VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF feature, it will merge big packet into rx vq. Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 5 ++ 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git

On 2018/11/6 11:43, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/5 ??3:45, jiangyiwen wrote: >> When vhost support VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF feature, >> it will merge big packet into rx vq. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> >> --- >> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- >>

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 11:08:04AM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: > On 2018/12/12 23:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 05:29:31PM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: > >> When vhost support VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF feature, > >> it will merge big packet into rx vq. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> > >

On 2018/11/5 ??3:45, jiangyiwen wrote: > In driver probing, if virtio has VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF feature, > it will fill mergeable rx buffer, support for host send mergeable > rx buffer. It will fill a page everytime to compact with small > packet and big packet. > > Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> > --- > include/linux/virtio_vsock.h |

When vhost support VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF feature, it will merge big packet into rx vq. Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 5 ++ 3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git