Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "[PATCH v2 0/2] guard virt_spin_lock() with a static key"
2017 Sep 06
5
[PATCH v3 0/2] guard virt_spin_lock() with a static key
With virt_spin_lock() being guarded by a static key the bare metal case
can be optimized by patching the call away completely. In case a kernel
running as a guest it can decide whether to use paravitualized
spinlocks, the current fallback to the unfair test-and-set scheme, or
to mimic the bare metal behavior.
V3:
- remove test for hypervisor environment from virt_spin_lock(9 as
suggested by
2017 Sep 06
5
[PATCH v3 0/2] guard virt_spin_lock() with a static key
With virt_spin_lock() being guarded by a static key the bare metal case
can be optimized by patching the call away completely. In case a kernel
running as a guest it can decide whether to use paravitualized
spinlocks, the current fallback to the unfair test-and-set scheme, or
to mimic the bare metal behavior.
V3:
- remove test for hypervisor environment from virt_spin_lock(9 as
suggested by
2017 Sep 06
2
[PATCH v2 1/2] paravirt/locks: use new static key for controlling call of virt_spin_lock()
On 09/06/2017 11:29 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> There are cases where a guest tries to switch spinlocks to bare metal
> behavior (e.g. by setting "xen_nopvspin" boot parameter). Today this
> has the downside of falling back to unfair test and set scheme for
> qspinlocks due to virt_spin_lock() detecting the virtualized
> environment.
>
> Add a static key controlling
2017 Sep 06
2
[PATCH v2 1/2] paravirt/locks: use new static key for controlling call of virt_spin_lock()
On 09/06/2017 11:29 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> There are cases where a guest tries to switch spinlocks to bare metal
> behavior (e.g. by setting "xen_nopvspin" boot parameter). Today this
> has the downside of falling back to unfair test and set scheme for
> qspinlocks due to virt_spin_lock() detecting the virtualized
> environment.
>
> Add a static key controlling
2017 Sep 05
7
[PATCH 0/4] make virt_spin_lock() a pvops function
With virt_spin_lock() being a pvops function the bare metal case can be
optimized by patching the call away completely. In case a kernel running
as a guest it can decide whether to use paravitualized spinlocks, the
current fallback to the unfair test-and-set scheme, or to mimic the
bare metal behavior.
Juergen Gross (4):
paravirt: add generic _paravirt_false() function
paravirt: switch
2017 Sep 05
7
[PATCH 0/4] make virt_spin_lock() a pvops function
With virt_spin_lock() being a pvops function the bare metal case can be
optimized by patching the call away completely. In case a kernel running
as a guest it can decide whether to use paravitualized spinlocks, the
current fallback to the unfair test-and-set scheme, or to mimic the
bare metal behavior.
Juergen Gross (4):
paravirt: add generic _paravirt_false() function
paravirt: switch
2017 Sep 05
2
[PATCH 3/4] paravirt: add virt_spin_lock pvops function
On 09/05/2017 09:24 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> There are cases where a guest tries to switch spinlocks to bare metal
> behavior (e.g. by setting "xen_nopvspin" boot parameter). Today this
> has the downside of falling back to unfair test and set scheme for
> qspinlocks due to virt_spin_lock() detecting the virtualized
> environment.
>
> Make virt_spin_lock() a
2017 Sep 05
2
[PATCH 3/4] paravirt: add virt_spin_lock pvops function
On 09/05/2017 09:24 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> There are cases where a guest tries to switch spinlocks to bare metal
> behavior (e.g. by setting "xen_nopvspin" boot parameter). Today this
> has the downside of falling back to unfair test and set scheme for
> qspinlocks due to virt_spin_lock() detecting the virtualized
> environment.
>
> Make virt_spin_lock() a
2017 Sep 05
3
[PATCH 3/4] paravirt: add virt_spin_lock pvops function
On 09/05/2017 10:18 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 05/09/17 16:10, Waiman Long wrote:
>> On 09/05/2017 09:24 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> There are cases where a guest tries to switch spinlocks to bare metal
>>> behavior (e.g. by setting "xen_nopvspin" boot parameter). Today this
>>> has the downside of falling back to unfair test and set scheme for
2017 Sep 05
3
[PATCH 3/4] paravirt: add virt_spin_lock pvops function
On 09/05/2017 10:18 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 05/09/17 16:10, Waiman Long wrote:
>> On 09/05/2017 09:24 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> There are cases where a guest tries to switch spinlocks to bare metal
>>> behavior (e.g. by setting "xen_nopvspin" boot parameter). Today this
>>> has the downside of falling back to unfair test and set scheme for
2017 Nov 01
2
[PATCH] x86/paravirt: Add kernel parameter to choose paravirt lock type
Currently, there are 3 different lock types that can be chosen for
the x86 architecture:
- qspinlock
- pvqspinlock
- unfair lock
One of the above lock types will be chosen at boot time depending on
a number of different factors.
Ideally, the hypervisors should be able to pick the best performing
lock type for the current VM configuration. That is not currently
the case as the performance of
2017 Nov 01
2
[PATCH] x86/paravirt: Add kernel parameter to choose paravirt lock type
Currently, there are 3 different lock types that can be chosen for
the x86 architecture:
- qspinlock
- pvqspinlock
- unfair lock
One of the above lock types will be chosen at boot time depending on
a number of different factors.
Ideally, the hypervisors should be able to pick the best performing
lock type for the current VM configuration. That is not currently
the case as the performance of
2017 Nov 01
3
[PATCH-tip v2 0/2] x86/paravirt: Enable users to choose PV lock type
v1->v2:
- Make pv_spinlock_type a bit mask for easier checking.
- Add patch 2 to deprecate xen_nopvspin
v1 - https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/1/381
Patch 1 adds a new pvlock_type parameter for the administrators to
specify the type of lock to be used in a para-virtualized kernel.
Patch 2 deprecates Xen's xen_nopvspin parameter as it is no longer
needed.
Waiman Long (2):
x86/paravirt:
2017 Nov 01
3
[PATCH-tip v2 0/2] x86/paravirt: Enable users to choose PV lock type
v1->v2:
- Make pv_spinlock_type a bit mask for easier checking.
- Add patch 2 to deprecate xen_nopvspin
v1 - https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/1/381
Patch 1 adds a new pvlock_type parameter for the administrators to
specify the type of lock to be used in a para-virtualized kernel.
Patch 2 deprecates Xen's xen_nopvspin parameter as it is no longer
needed.
Waiman Long (2):
x86/paravirt:
2017 Sep 06
0
[PATCH v2 1/2] paravirt/locks: use new static key for controlling call of virt_spin_lock()
There are cases where a guest tries to switch spinlocks to bare metal
behavior (e.g. by setting "xen_nopvspin" boot parameter). Today this
has the downside of falling back to unfair test and set scheme for
qspinlocks due to virt_spin_lock() detecting the virtualized
environment.
Add a static key controlling whether virt_spin_lock() should be
called or not. When running on bare metal set
2017 Sep 06
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] paravirt/locks: use new static key for controlling call of virt_spin_lock()
On 09/06/2017 12:04 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 11:49:49AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> #define virt_spin_lock virt_spin_lock
>>> static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
>>> {
>>> + if (!static_branch_likely(&virt_spin_lock_key))
>>> + return false;
>>> if
2017 Sep 06
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] paravirt/locks: use new static key for controlling call of virt_spin_lock()
On 09/06/2017 12:04 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 11:49:49AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>>> #define virt_spin_lock virt_spin_lock
>>> static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
>>> {
>>> + if (!static_branch_likely(&virt_spin_lock_key))
>>> + return false;
>>> if
2017 Sep 05
2
[PATCH 3/4] paravirt: add virt_spin_lock pvops function
On 09/05/2017 09:24 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> There are cases where a guest tries to switch spinlocks to bare metal
> behavior (e.g. by setting "xen_nopvspin" boot parameter). Today this
> has the downside of falling back to unfair test and set scheme for
> qspinlocks due to virt_spin_lock() detecting the virtualized
> environment.
>
> Make virt_spin_lock() a
2017 Sep 05
2
[PATCH 3/4] paravirt: add virt_spin_lock pvops function
On 09/05/2017 09:24 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> There are cases where a guest tries to switch spinlocks to bare metal
> behavior (e.g. by setting "xen_nopvspin" boot parameter). Today this
> has the downside of falling back to unfair test and set scheme for
> qspinlocks due to virt_spin_lock() detecting the virtualized
> environment.
>
> Make virt_spin_lock() a
2017 Sep 05
0
[PATCH 3/4] paravirt: add virt_spin_lock pvops function
There are cases where a guest tries to switch spinlocks to bare metal
behavior (e.g. by setting "xen_nopvspin" boot parameter). Today this
has the downside of falling back to unfair test and set scheme for
qspinlocks due to virt_spin_lock() detecting the virtualized
environment.
Make virt_spin_lock() a paravirt operation in order to enable users
to select an explicit behavior like bare