similar to: [PATCH net-next 5/6] net: use core MTU range checking in virt drivers

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[PATCH net-next 5/6] net: use core MTU range checking in virt drivers"

2016 Oct 20
4
[PATCH net-next v2 6/9] net: use core MTU range checking in virt drivers
hyperv_net: - set min/max_mtu, per Haiyang, after rndis_filter_device_add virtio_net: - set min/max_mtu - remove virtnet_change_mtu vmxnet3: - set min/max_mtu xen-netback: - min_mtu = 0, max_mtu = 65517 xen-netfront: - min_mtu = 0, max_mtu = 65535 unisys/visor: - clean up defines a little to not clash with network core or add redundat definitions CC: netdev at vger.kernel.org CC:
2016 Oct 20
4
[PATCH net-next v2 6/9] net: use core MTU range checking in virt drivers
hyperv_net: - set min/max_mtu, per Haiyang, after rndis_filter_device_add virtio_net: - set min/max_mtu - remove virtnet_change_mtu vmxnet3: - set min/max_mtu xen-netback: - min_mtu = 0, max_mtu = 65517 xen-netfront: - min_mtu = 0, max_mtu = 65535 unisys/visor: - clean up defines a little to not clash with network core or add redundat definitions CC: netdev at vger.kernel.org CC:
2016 Oct 19
0
[PATCH net-next 5/6] net: use core MTU range checking in virt drivers
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jarod Wilson [mailto:jarod at redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:34 PM > To: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org > Cc: Jarod Wilson <jarod at redhat.com>; netdev at vger.kernel.org; > virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org; KY Srinivasan > <kys at microsoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz at microsoft.com>;
2016 Oct 20
0
[PATCH net-next v2 6/9] net: use core MTU range checking in virt drivers
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 01:55:21PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > hyperv_net: > - set min/max_mtu, per Haiyang, after rndis_filter_device_add > > virtio_net: > - set min/max_mtu > - remove virtnet_change_mtu > vmxnet3: > - set min/max_mtu > > xen-netback: > - min_mtu = 0, max_mtu = 65517 > > xen-netfront: > - min_mtu = 0, max_mtu = 65535 > >
2016 Oct 21
2
[PATCH net-next v2 6/9] net: use core MTU range checking in virt drivers
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:23:54PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 01:55:21PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: ... > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > index fad84f3..720809f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > @@ -1419,17 +1419,6 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops
2016 Oct 21
2
[PATCH net-next v2 6/9] net: use core MTU range checking in virt drivers
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:23:54PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 01:55:21PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: ... > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > index fad84f3..720809f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > @@ -1419,17 +1419,6 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops
2016 Oct 19
1
[PATCH net-next 5/6] net: use core MTU range checking in virt drivers
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 04:59:46PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:33:32PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > index fad84f3..4885a42 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > @@ -1419,17 +1419,6 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops
2016 Oct 19
1
[PATCH net-next 5/6] net: use core MTU range checking in virt drivers
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 04:59:46PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:33:32PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > index fad84f3..4885a42 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > @@ -1419,17 +1419,6 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops
2016 Oct 25
4
[PATCH] virtio-net: Update the mtu code to match virtio spec
From: Aaron Conole <aconole at bytheb.org> The virtio committee recently ratified a change, VIRTIO-152, which defines the mtu field to be 'max' MTU, not simply desired MTU. This commit brings the virtio-net device in compliance with VIRTIO-152. Additionally, drop the max_mtu branch - it cannot be taken since the u16 returned by virtio_cread16 will never exceed the initial value of
2016 Oct 25
4
[PATCH] virtio-net: Update the mtu code to match virtio spec
From: Aaron Conole <aconole at bytheb.org> The virtio committee recently ratified a change, VIRTIO-152, which defines the mtu field to be 'max' MTU, not simply desired MTU. This commit brings the virtio-net device in compliance with VIRTIO-152. Additionally, drop the max_mtu branch - it cannot be taken since the u16 returned by virtio_cread16 will never exceed the initial value of
2016 Mar 10
4
[RFC -next 0/2] virtio-net: Advised MTU feature
The following series adds the ability for a hypervisor to set an MTU on the guest during feature negotiation phase. This is useful for VM orchestration when, for instance, tunneling is involved and the MTU of the various systems should be homogenous. The first patch adds the feature bit as described in the proposed VFIO spec addition found at
2016 Mar 10
4
[RFC -next 0/2] virtio-net: Advised MTU feature
The following series adds the ability for a hypervisor to set an MTU on the guest during feature negotiation phase. This is useful for VM orchestration when, for instance, tunneling is involved and the MTU of the various systems should be homogenous. The first patch adds the feature bit as described in the proposed VFIO spec addition found at
2018 Apr 20
13
[PATCH net-next v7 0/4] Enable virtio_net to act as a standby for a passthru device
The main motivation for this patch is to enable cloud service providers to provide an accelerated datapath to virtio-net enabled VMs in a transparent manner with no/minimal guest userspace changes. This also enables hypervisor controlled live migration to be supported with VMs that have direct attached SR-IOV VF devices. Patch 1 introduces a new feature bit VIRTIO_NET_F_STANDBY that can be used
2016 Oct 25
1
[PATCH v2 net-next] virtio-net: Update the mtu code to match virtio spec
The virtio committee recently ratified a change, VIRTIO-152, which defines the mtu field to be 'max' MTU, not simply desired MTU. This commit brings the virtio-net device in compliance with VIRTIO-152. Additionally, drop the max_mtu branch - it cannot be taken since the u16 returned by virtio_cread16 will never exceed the initial value of max_mtu. Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole
2016 Oct 25
1
[PATCH v2 net-next] virtio-net: Update the mtu code to match virtio spec
The virtio committee recently ratified a change, VIRTIO-152, which defines the mtu field to be 'max' MTU, not simply desired MTU. This commit brings the virtio-net device in compliance with VIRTIO-152. Additionally, drop the max_mtu branch - it cannot be taken since the u16 returned by virtio_cread16 will never exceed the initial value of max_mtu. Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole
2016 Mar 15
9
[RFC v2 -next 0/2] virtio-net: Advised MTU feature
The following series adds the ability for a hypervisor to set an MTU on the guest during feature negotiation phase. This is useful for VM orchestration when, for instance, tunneling is involved and the MTU of the various systems should be homogenous. The first patch adds the feature bit as described in the proposed VFIO spec addition found at
2016 Mar 15
9
[RFC v2 -next 0/2] virtio-net: Advised MTU feature
The following series adds the ability for a hypervisor to set an MTU on the guest during feature negotiation phase. This is useful for VM orchestration when, for instance, tunneling is involved and the MTU of the various systems should be homogenous. The first patch adds the feature bit as described in the proposed VFIO spec addition found at
2016 Mar 10
1
[RFC -next 2/2] virtio_net: Read and use the advised MTU
Hello. On 03/10/2016 05:28 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it > exists, read the advised MTU and use it. > > No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the > negotiated MTU. A future commit will add proper error handling. Instead, a > warning is emitted if the guest changes the device
2016 Mar 10
1
[RFC -next 2/2] virtio_net: Read and use the advised MTU
Hello. On 03/10/2016 05:28 PM, Aaron Conole wrote: > This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it > exists, read the advised MTU and use it. > > No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the > negotiated MTU. A future commit will add proper error handling. Instead, a > warning is emitted if the guest changes the device
2016 Mar 16
1
[RFC v2 -next 2/2] virtio_net: Read the advised MTU
Hello. On 3/16/2016 12:04 AM, Aaron Conole wrote: > This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it > exists, read the advised MTU and use it. > > No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the > negotiated MTU. A future commit will add proper error handling. Instead, a > warning is emitted if the guest changes the device