similar to: Centosplus for centos 5

On 09/25/2020 05:42 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:51 AM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >> On 09/15/2020 08:07 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >>>> I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the

(This is a copy of an email I've sent to the jfs-discussion list. I'm copying here in the hope that I'll get help from somewhere...) I'm running Centos 4.2 with kernel-2.6.9-22.0.2.106.unsupported and jfsutils-1.1.10-3.2 from the centosplus distribution, with a jfs partition for my maildir mail spool, accessed using the dovecot IMAP server. It seems that dovecot doesn't

Hello all, I'm relatively new to CentOS, but I've been using linux as my main operating system on both the desktop and server ends for the past 4 years. I currently have a PIII server with two 160GB IDE hard drives in it, in a virtual RAID 1 array. At the time of installation, the only FS choices for the largest partition, 120GB, were ext2 and ext3. I chose ext3, but now am wishing

On 09/15/2020 08:07 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 3:54 PM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: >> I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the latest version of jfs module but kmod-jfs does not seem to be available. >> >> Is anyone running it on the current version of CentOS?

Hello I run the latest kernel from centosplus and use a JFS partition. Even though the jfs tools are installed, when the server crashes, it doesn't run fsck.jfs automatically when at boot time it detects that the partition is corrupted I have to run fsck.jfs manually and mount the drive. Is there a way to make fsck.jfs run automatically if required ? (I recently moved from Fedora to

Hi folks... trying to pick between jfs and xfs for a filesystem. In the past we've used jfs with CentOS + centosplus, however, an older post indicated that this may not be the best choice as the version of jfs included with the centosplus kernel would only be as new as the version that was included in the 2.6.18 kernel as RH doesn't backport fixes... It looks like xfs isn't part of

All, There have been many requests for added kernel features that the upstream provider left out of the standard kernel. (ReiserFS, Video4Linux, Firewire support, XFS, NTFS, JFS, etc.). We want the main release CDs to contain a standard kernel for compatibility and stability reasons. CentOS is created as a clone, and it needs to be as close as possible to the upstream distro. That being said,

OK, so I need to bring up a new vm and was wondering what the state of vm kernels for centos. I have read this http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189about the tick divider but it wasn't clear what the best step forward is for centos 5.1 was, i usually ran with the clocksource=pit option and it looked like that and the divider option caused a problem. I have in the past compiled my own but

What does the CentOSPlus kernel have that the standard kernel does not? It is just additional drivers and modules? Or are there additional differences? -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software -- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows heller at deepsoft.com --

Now that I've been enlightened to the terrible write performance of ext3 on my new 3Ware RAID 5 array, I'm stuck choosing an alternative filesystem. I benchmarked XFS, JFS, ReiserFS and ext3 and they came back in that order from best to worst performer. I'm leaning towards XFS because of performance and because centosplus makes kernel modules available for the stock kernel.

I had installed kmod-jfs in an earlier version of CentOS 7, 7.4 if I remember correctly. I now have a machine running the latest version of jfs module but kmod-jfs does not seem to be available. Is anyone running it on the current version of CentOS?

Thank you, installed it and it worked fine. Now I am looking for the same for CentOS 7... It did not look like you have that in your repository? On 3/13/2017 1:09 PM, Nux! wrote: > yum -y install http://mirrors.coreix.net/elrepo/elrepo/el6/x86_64/RPMS/kmod-jfs-0.0-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64.rpm > > (that's for 64bit, adjust the url accordingly for 32bit) > > it won't hose your

Lots of opinions out there and I have read and read, so I have a home server that I have finally setup with a hot swap hdd cage and what I am planning on doing is copying my data drive every other day and rotating them offsite, haven't figured out how often though. So I did my first test last night and the backup drive was formatted with ext3 but looking to try to speed things up and was

So still coming up to speed with mdadm and I notice this morning one of my servers acting sluggish...so when I looked at the mdadm raid device I see this: mdadm --detail /dev/md0 /dev/md0: Version : 0.90 Creation Time : Mon Sep 27 22:47:44 2010 Raid Level : raid10 Array Size : 976759808 (931.51 GiB 1000.20 GB) Used Dev Size : 976759808 (931.51 GiB 1000.20 GB) Raid

I have several Centos 8 machines that I update and every now and again I will go through and update all of them and one of them will get a slow mirror, like downloading the kernel at 50kb etc. With the newer version I am unable to figure out how to force it to update the mirror list and hopefully change to a faster mirror. I have searched but must not be using the right verbiage since I am unable

So I am trying to rebuild this source rpm from fedora 10, shutter-0.85.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -its a screen capture application ( http://shutter-project.org/ ) that I have been unable to find in any repos, although it is in the fedora repos. Thought I would give it a go and try to rebuild the rpm, so here is the error that I am getting: + desktop-file-install --delete-original --dir

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2005:1210-1 CentOS 4 x86_64 jfsutils - bugfix update (CENTOSPLUS Only) This package is for the version of jfsutils is that is included in the centosplus repo for CentOS-4 ... this is not an update to the main CentOS-4 repo. The JFS team has released a new version of jfsutils and this has been incorporated into this CentOS Plus version. x86_64:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2005:1210-1 CentOS 4 i386 jfsutils - bugfix update (CENTOSPLUS Only) This package is for the version of jfsutils is that is included in the centosplus repo for CentOS-4 ... this is not an update to the main CentOS-4 repo. The JFS team has released a new version of jfsutils and this has been incorporated into this CentOS Plus version. i386:

While trying to get my SD card reader to work with CentOS, it was recommended to me that I update to the centosplus kernel. I attempted to do so using yum, as was recommended, but I encountered the following error: [root at localhost ~]# yum --enablerepo=centosplus update kernel Repository update already added, not adding again Error getting repository data for centosplus, repository not

Hello List, I have a regular install of centos 4.4 i386 (lately updated to 4.5), a new application needs mysql > 5.0.x The natural way to do this was: yum --enablerepo=centosplus update mysql However, after all the dependency / transaction checks.. i get this.. Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch