similar to: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps

Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this (maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver init, at least on my ThinkPad P72: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd 008c data 00000000 0000508c 0000102b This is magic nvidia speak for "You need to have the DMA notifier

Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this (maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver init, at least on my ThinkPad P72: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd 008c data 00000000 0000508c 0000102b This is magic nvidia speak for "You need to have the DMA notifier

Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this (maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver init, at least on my ThinkPad P72: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd 008c data 00000000 0000508c 0000102b This is magic nvidia speak for "You need to have the DMA notifier

These didn't apply cleanly to v5.8, so here's a backported version. Lyude Paul (2): drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Program notifier offset before requesting disp caps drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Log SOR/PIOR caps drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++----- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 10 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this (maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver init, at least on my ThinkPad P72: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd 008c data 00000000 0000508c 0000102b This is magic nvidia speak for "You need to have the DMA notifier

On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 04:33, Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> wrote: > > Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this > (maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc > appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver > init, at least on my ThinkPad P72: > > nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd

On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 02:52, Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 08:28 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 04:33, Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> wrote: > > > Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this > > > (maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc

Currently, nouveau doesn't actually bother to try probing whether or not it can actually handle interlaced modes over DisplayPort. As a result, on volta and later we'll end up trying to set an interlaced mode even when it's not supported and cause the front end for the display engine to hang. So, let's teach nouveau to reject interlaced modes on hardware that can't actually

Currently, nouveau doesn't actually bother to try probing whether or not it can actually handle interlaced modes over DisplayPort. As a result, on volta and later we'll end up trying to set an interlaced mode even when it's not supported and cause the front end for the display engine to hang. So, let's teach nouveau to reject interlaced modes on hardware that can't actually

Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this (maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver init, at least on my ThinkPad P72: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: disp: chid 0 mthd 008c data 00000000 0000508c 0000102b This is magic nvidia speak for "You need to have the DMA notifier

On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 08:28 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote: > On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 04:33, Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> wrote: > > Not entirely sure why this never came up when I originally tested this > > (maybe some BIOSes already have this setup?) but the ->caps_init vfunc > > appears to cause the display engine to throw an exception on driver > > init, at

This is mainly for dropping interlaced modes on DP connectors if the GPU would otherwise display garbage or EVO timesout. It also adds experimental detection of the HDMI clock limit we currently hard limit depending on the GPU generation. Starting with GF110 GPUs, we can retrieve the limit directly from the GPU and may make the hdmimhz parameter obsolete. Testing this series with 2560x1440 or

small update to my last version I sent out. Patches 3-6 are optional and should only improve detecting the max clocks for HDMI and DP, but they didn't underwent big testing and I am a bit concerned, that it might break detecting the DP limits on some boards. Karol Herbst (6): kms/nv50: move nv50_mstm out of the dp union in nouveau_encoder kms/nv50: reject interlaced modes if the hardware

Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/outp.c | 8 ++------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/outp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/outp.c index 6094805fbd63..06b19883a06b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/outp.c +++

I ran into this issue on a gm204 GPU with a display reporting interlaced modes. Nvidia dropped those modelines for DP, but not HDMI. We should do the same on hardware where interlaced modes aren't supported via DP. Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <kherbst at redhat.com> --- drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core.h | 10 ++++++++++ drm/nouveau/dispnv50/core507d.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++

Noticed these in both the disable (which we'll be getting rid of in a moment) and the atomic disable callbacks: both callback types check whether or not there's actually a CRTC assigned to the given encoder. However, as ->atomic_disable and ->disable will never be called without a CRTC assigned to the given encoder there's no point in this check. So just remove it.

Now that we're supporting things like Ada and the GSP, there's situations where we really need to actually know the display state that we're starting with when loading the driver in order to prevent breaking GSP expectations. The first step in doing this is making it so that we can read the current state of IORs from nvkm in DRM, so that we can fill in said into into the atomic state.

The patches contain some tidy-up work, and refactoring that has arisen as a by-product of my initial work on adding TV support to nv50. Joel Holdsworth (4): drm/nouveau: Removed unneeded include in nvc0_fence.c drm/nouveau: Replaced magic numbers with defines from nouveau_reg drm/nouveau: Replaced copy-pasted nv_wait with nv50_wait_dpms_ctrl helper drm/nouveau: Refactored encoder

This makes debugging with DP tracing a lot harder to interpret, so name each i2c based off the name of the encoder that it's for Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c | 12 ++++++++++--

Hi folks, Currently, when the device is removed (or the driver is unbound) the nouveau_drm structure de-allocated. However, it's still accessible from and used by some DRM layer callbacks. For example, file handles can be closed after the device has been removed (physically or otherwise). This series converts the Nouveau device structure to be allocated and de-allocated with the