Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3"
2018 Nov 30
2
[PATCH RFC 03/15] drm/nouveau: replace **** with a hug
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 5:30 PM Jarkko Sakkinen
<jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/macros.fuc | 2 +-
>
2018 Nov 30
1
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
On 30/11/2018 20:40, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
> <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug.
>
> Heh. I support the replacement of the stronger language, but I find
> "hug", "hugged", and "hugging" to be very weird replacements.
2018 Nov 30
1
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
On 30 Nov 2018, at 14:40, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
> <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug.
>
> Heh. I support the replacement of the stronger language, but I find
> "hug", "hugged", and "hugging" to be very weird
2018 Nov 30
0
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
<jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug.
Heh. I support the replacement of the stronger language, but I find
"hug", "hugged", and "hugging" to be very weird replacements. Can we
bikeshed this to "heck", "hecked", and
2018 Nov 30
8
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
><jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug.
I hope this is some kind of joke. How would anyone get offended by reading
technical comments? This is all beyond me...
Thanks,
Davidlohr
2018 Nov 30
4
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
On Friday, 30 November 2018 20:35:07 GMT David Miller wrote:
> From: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk>
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:12:26 -0700
>
> > On 11/30/18 12:56 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> >> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
> >>> <jarkko.sakkinen at
2018 Nov 30
2
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
On 11/30/18 12:56 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
>> <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug.
>
> I hope this is some kind of joke. How would anyone get offended by reading
> technical
2018 Nov 30
1
[PATCH RFC 03/15] drm/nouveau: replace **** with a hug
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 7:26 PM Jarkko Sakkinen
<jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 06:13:50PM -0200, Diego Viola wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 5:30 PM Jarkko Sakkinen
> > <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug.
> > >
> >
2018 Nov 30
0
[PATCH RFC 03/15] drm/nouveau: replace **** with a hug
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 06:13:50PM -0200, Diego Viola wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 5:30 PM Jarkko Sakkinen
> <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >
2018 Nov 30
5
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:12:19 -0800
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> As a maintainer myself (and based on somewhat disturbed feedback from
> other maintainers) I can only make the conclusion that nobody knows what
> the responsibility part here means.
>
> I would interpret, if I read it like at lawyer at least, that even for
> existing code you
2018 Nov 30
0
[PATCH RFC 03/15] drm/nouveau: replace **** with a hug
In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug.
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/fuc/macros.fuc | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/init.c
2018 Nov 30
3
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 12:55 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:56:52AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
> > > <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In order to comply with the CoC, replace
2018 Nov 30
2
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 12:35:07PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk>
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:12:26 -0700
>
> > On 11/30/18 12:56 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> >> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
> >>> <jarkko.sakkinen at
2018 Nov 30
1
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:48:08PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com>
> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:44:05 -0800
>
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:01:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> >> No because use of what some people consider to be bad language isn't
> >> necessarily abusive, offensive or
2018 Nov 30
3
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 13:44 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:01:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > No because use of what some people consider to be bad language
> > isn't necessarily abusive, offensive or degrading. Our most
> > heavily censored medium is TV and "fuck" is now considered
> > acceptable in certain contexts on
2018 Nov 30
2
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:26 -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 03:14:59PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
[...]
> > Have you read Documentation/process/code-of-conduct-
> > interpretation.rst?
> > As has been pointed out, it contains a clear answer to how things
> > should be interpreted here.
>
> Ugh, was not aware that there two documents.
2018 Nov 30
1
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:01:02PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> No because use of what some people consider to be bad language isn't
> necessarily abusive, offensive or degrading. Our most heavily censored
> medium is TV and "fuck" is now considered acceptable in certain
> contexts on most channels in the UK and EU.
This makes following the CoC extremely hard to a
2018 Nov 30
0
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 20:39:01 +0000
Abuse <abuse at 2.abuse.bgcomp.co.uk> wrote:
> On Friday, 30 November 2018 20:35:07 GMT David Miller wrote:
> > From: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk>
> > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:12:26 -0700
> >
> > > On 11/30/18 12:56 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > >> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
> >
2018 Nov 30
0
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:56:52AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
> > <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug.
>
> I hope this is some kind of joke. How would anyone get offended by
2018 Nov 30
0
[PATCH RFC 00/15] Zero ****s, hugload of hugs <3
Am 01.12.2018 um 09:12 schrieb Jens Axboe:
> On 11/30/18 12:56 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen
>>> <jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug.
>>
>> I hope this is