Displaying 20 results from an estimated 900 matches similar to: "[PATCH] fix:nv10_fence: mark symbols static where possible"
2016 Sep 25
0
[PATCH 2/3] drm/nouveau: mark symbols static where possible
We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/fan.c:29:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvbios_fan_table' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gt215.c:184:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gt215_clk_info' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/ramgt215.c:153:1: warning: no
2016 Aug 30
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: silence warnings reported during builds with W=1
We get some warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgf117.c:222:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gf117_grctx_generate_main' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxnv50.c:255:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nv50_grctx_fill' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxnv50.c:265:1:
2016 Oct 24
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] drm/nouveau: add missing header dependencies
We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:34:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_get' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:58:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_put' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/fb/sddr3.c:69:1: warning: no previous
2016 Oct 22
18
[PATCH 01/17] drm/nouveau/core: add missing header dependencies
We get 2 warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:34:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_get' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/firmware.c:58:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_firmware_put' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
In fact, these functions are declared in
2014 May 14
0
[RFC PATCH v1 07/16] drm/nouveau: rework to new fence interface
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at ubuntu.com>
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/core/event.c | 4
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 6
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 4
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 434 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
2012 Dec 26
0
[PATCH] drm/nv17-50: restore fence buffer on resume
Since commit 5e120f6e4b3f35b741c5445dfc755f50128c3c44 "drm/nouveau/fence:
convert to exec engine, and improve channel sync" nouveau fence sync
implementation for nv17-50 and nvc0+ started to rely on state of fence buffer
left by previous sync operation. But as pinned bo's (where fence state is
stored) are not saved+restored across suspend/resume, we need to do it
manually.
nvc0+ was
2024 Jan 23
1
[PATCH] nouveau: rip out fence irq allow/block sequences.
From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
fences are signalled on nvidia hw using non-stall interrupts.
non-stall interrupts are not latched from my reading.
When nouveau emits a fence, it requests a NON_STALL signalling,
but it only calls the interface to allow the non-stall irq to happen
after it has already emitted the fence. A recent change
eacabb546271 ("nouveau: push event
2024 Jan 25
1
[PATCH] nouveau: rip out fence irq allow/block sequences.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 05:25:38PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
>
> fences are signalled on nvidia hw using non-stall interrupts.
>
> non-stall interrupts are not latched from my reading.
>
> When nouveau emits a fence, it requests a NON_STALL signalling,
> but it only calls the interface to allow the non-stall irq to happen
2016 Aug 29
1
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/gr: mark gm107_grctx_generate_tpcid() static
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie at linaro.org> wrote:
> We get 1 warning when build kernel with W=1:
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgm107.c:937:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gm107_grctx_generate_tpcid' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
> declared and don't need a
2016 Aug 30
1
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/gr: mark gm107_grctx_generate_tpcid() static
On 30 August 2016 at 00:01, Sean Paul <seanpaul at google.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie at linaro.org> wrote:
> > We get 1 warning when build kernel with W=1:
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgm107.c:937:1: warning: no
> previous prototype for 'gm107_grctx_generate_tpcid' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> >
2016 Aug 29
2
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/gr: mark gm107_grctx_generate_tpcid() static
We get 1 warning when build kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgm107.c:937:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gm107_grctx_generate_tpcid' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
so this patch marks this function with 'static'.
Signed-off-by:
2016 Aug 30
0
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/gr: mark gm107_grctx_generate_tpcid() static
On Tuesday 30 August 2016, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> On 30 August 2016 at 00:01, Sean Paul <seanpaul at google.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie at linaro.org> wrote:
> > > We get 1 warning when build kernel with W=1:
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgm107.c:937:1: warning: no
> > previous prototype
2016 Sep 01
0
[PATCH] virtio: mark vring_dma_dev() static
On Thursday, September 1, 2016 7:02:57 PM CEST Baoyou Xie wrote:
> We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:170:16: warning: no previous prototype for 'vring_dma_dev' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
> declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
> so this
2016 Sep 01
0
[PATCH] virtio: mark vring_dma_dev() static
On Thursday, September 1, 2016 7:02:57 PM CEST Baoyou Xie wrote:
> We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1:
> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c:170:16: warning: no previous prototype for 'vring_dma_dev' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
>
> In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
> declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
> so this
2010 Apr 15
5
Apparent BIND problem doing RBL lookups for Postfix
My apologies if I'm posting the wrong place, or am asking a common
question. All my looking so far hasn't turned up anything very useful
in knowing what to look at, or what to modify.
---
CentOS 5, running BIND 9.3.6
i386
Hardware:
P4, 2.8Ghz, 1G memory
Sata drives - non mirrored etc.
Load is light, usually under 0.1
--
This box is running Postfix as our mail server. BIND (9.3.6)
2024 Jan 29
1
[PATCH] nouveau: offload fence uevents work to workqueue
From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
This should break the deadlock between the fctx lock and the irq lock.
This offloads the processing off the work from the irq into a workqueue.
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 19
2016 Aug 29
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/gr/gf117-: mark symbols static where possible
We get 1 warning when biuld kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/ctxgf117.c:222:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gf117_grctx_generate_main' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
so this patch marks this function with 'static'.
Signed-off-by:
2016 Aug 29
0
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau/pm: mark nvkm_perfsig_find() static
We get 2 warnings when build kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/pm/base.c:75:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_perfsig_find' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/pm/base.c:703:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nvkm_perfsrc_new' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
In fact, these functions are only used in the file in which they are
declared
2016 Aug 28
0
[PATCH] fix:nouveau_display: mark symbols static where possible
We get 1 warning about global functions without a declaration
in the nouveau nouveau_display driver when building with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c:96:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'nouveau_display_scanoutpos_head' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is declared
and don't need a declaration, but can be made
2016 Aug 29
0
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/gr/gm107: mark symbols static where possible
We get 1 warning when build kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gm107.c:312:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'gm107_gr_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
so this patch marks this function with 'static'.
Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie