similar to: Processed: severity of 813678 is serious, severity of 813037 is serious

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Processed: severity of 813678 is serious, severity of 813037 is serious"

2013 Jul 19
0
Processed: user debian-qa@lists.debian.org, tagging 714794, tagging 710035, found 668754 in 0.36-1 ...
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user debian-qa at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was anbe at debian.org). > tags 714794 - moreinfo Bug #714794 {Done: Gilles Filippini <pini at debian.org>} [release.debian.org] pu: package sikuli/1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-5+deb7u1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > tags 710035 - moreinfo Bug #710035
2013 Oct 31
0
Processed: found 728266 in 2.0.91-2, tagging 728266, severity of 701278 is important, found 728158 in 0.9.0-2 ...
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > found 728266 2.0.91-2 Bug #728266 [blktap-dkms] Depends on obsolete packages Marked as found in versions blktap-dkms/2.0.91-2. > tags 728266 + jessie sid Bug #728266 [blktap-dkms] Depends on obsolete packages Added tag(s) sid and jessie. > severity 701278 important Bug #701278 [src:flush] flush: ftbfs with GCC-4.8 Severity set to
2016 Feb 04
1
Bug#813678: blktap-dkms: fails to build with mainline 4.4 based kernels
Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.5 Severity: important Tags: patch User: apw at ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu xenial ubuntu-patch Mainline 4.4 switches how we detect atomicity. Follow that change when compiling against 4.4 based kernels. We are using this in Ubuntu with our latest kernels. Thanks for considering the patch. -apw -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid
2016 Mar 05
0
blktap-dkms_2.0.93-0.6_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 21:44:41 +0200 Source: blktap-dkms Binary: blktap-dkms Architecture: source Version: 2.0.93-0.6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Chrysostomos Nanakos <cnanakos at debian.org> Description: blktap-dkms -
2013 Jul 18
0
Processed: jessie
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 717155 + sid jessie Bug #717155 [iscsitarget-dkms] iscsitarget-dkms: Fails to build against Linux 3.10 Added tag(s) sid and jessie. > tags 717157 + sid jessie Bug #717157 [blktap-dkms] blktap-dkms: Fails to build against Linux 3.10 Added tag(s) sid and jessie. > tags 717166 + sid jessie Bug #717166 [openswan-modules-dkms]
2016 Feb 23
0
blktap-dkms is marked for autoremoval from testing
blktap-dkms 2.0.93-0.5 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-03-24 It is affected by these RC bugs: 813678: blktap-dkms: fails to build with mainline 4.4 based kernels
2012 Jan 05
0
Processed: tags 654757 + help
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 654757 + help Bug #654757 [blktap-dkms] blktap-dkms doesn't seem to always rebuild its module Added tag(s) help. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 654757: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654757 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org
2016 Feb 23
0
blktap is marked for autoremoval from testing
blktap 2.0.90-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2016-03-24 It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: 813678: blktap-dkms: fails to build with mainline 4.4 based kernels
2015 Oct 14
1
Bug#801768: blktap-dkms: module FTBFS for Linux 4.2: error: too many arguments to function 'mempool_resize'
Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.3 Severity: serious Tags: sid stretch User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to build a kernel module for the current sid kernel: Setting up blktap-dkms (2.0.93-0.3) ... Loading new blktap-2.0.93 DKMS files... First Installation: checking all kernels... dpkg: warning: version
2017 Sep 09
5
Bug#874751: blktap-dkms: module FTBFS for Linux 4.12
Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.10 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, blktap-dkms fails to build a module for Linux 4.12: Selecting previously unselected package blktap-dkms. (Reading database ... 34976 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to unpack .../blktap-dkms_2.0.93-0.10_amd64.deb ... Unpacking blktap-dkms (2.0.93-0.10) ...
2014 Oct 05
1
Bug#764132: fails to compile with linux-image-3.16-2-amd64
Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: normal With both linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 and linux-image-3.16-2-amd64 installed, blktap fails to compile for the 3.16-2 kernel, but succeeds for the 3.2.0-4 kernel. (Contrary to the dependency listing below, I do have the headers for 3.16-2 installed.) I am attaching the build log. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.6 APT prefers
2014 Mar 24
1
Bug#742515: blktap-dkms: blktapblktap kernel module failed to build
Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) blktap fails to build on kernel 3.13 and probably older kernels as well. According to this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blktap-dkms/+bug/1245009 VM_RESERVED is deprecated as of 3.7. Building with the patch described in that bug allows for
2012 Nov 26
2
Bug#694429: blktap-dkms: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8): /lib/modules/$KVERS/kernel/
Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: important User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8): http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails Filing this as important as having a piuparts clean
2014 Oct 05
1
Bug#764135: fails to compile with linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64
Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.3 Severity: normal With both linux-image-3.2.0-4-amd64 and linux-image-3.16-2-amd64 installed, blktap fails to compile for the 3.2.0-4 kernel, but succeeds for the 3.16-2 kernel. (Headers for both kernel versions are installed.) I am attaching the build log. Note that bug 764132 is for blktap-dkms version 2.0.91-1 and fails for the opposite kernel
2013 Jul 17
0
Bug#717157: blktap-dkms: Fails to build against Linux 3.10
Package: blktap-dkms Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, blktap-dkms FTBFS against linux 3.10-1 from unstable: Cheers, Moritz CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/control.o In file included from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/control.c:30:0: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/blktap.h:75:41: warning: variably modified ?pending? at file scope [enabled by
2014 May 22
2
Bug#748953: blktap-dkms: Struct bio was changed in 3.14 breaking build
Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.93-0.2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) The build fails on 3.14 kernel with the following error: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/ring.c: In function ?blktap_ring_make_tr_request?: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.93/build/ring.c:314:32: error: ?struct bio? has no member named ?bi_sector?
2011 Nov 14
2
Bug#648691: ITP: blktap-dkms -- Xen blktap kernel component DKMS package
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> * Package name : blktap-dkms Version : 2.0.90 Upstream Author : Jon Ludlam <jonathan.ludlam at eu.citrix.com> * URL : http://www.xen.org/ * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C Description : Xen blktap kernel component DKMS package This package
2012 Jun 15
1
Bug#677614: xcp-xapi: someone should create /etc/default/xen
Package: xcp-xapi Version: 1.3.2-6 Severity: important Looks like on Wheezy, /etc/default/xen is not created by xen-utils-common. Since xcp-xapi depends on its existence and further declaration of the toolstack in it, it should take extra care to ensure that it is present. root at debian:~# aptitude install xcp-xapi The following NEW packages will be installed: blktap-dkms{a} blktap-utils{a}
2012 Jan 05
1
Bug#654757: blktap-dkms doesn't seem to always rebuild its module
Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: normal After an update of the kernel in SID, I have noticed that blktap-dkms didn't automatically rebuild itself when I upgraded my server with a newer kernel version. My understanding is that it should have. Also, doing dpkg-reconfigure blktap-dkms or reinstalling the package did make it rebuild the kernel module. Thomas Goirand (zigo) --
2016 Feb 03
0
blktap-dkms_2.0.93-0.5_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:38:51 +0200 Source: blktap-dkms Binary: blktap-dkms Architecture: source Version: 2.0.93-0.5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: high Maintainer: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> Changed-By: Chrysostomos Nanakos <cnanakos at debian.org> Description: blktap-dkms - Xen