similar to: Bug#808624: Invalid argument while starting daemon

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Bug#808624: Invalid argument while starting daemon"

2016 Jan 20
0
Processed: reassign 808624 to src:xen, forcibly merging 369042 808624
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 808624 src:xen 4.4.1-9+deb8u3 Bug #808624 [xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64] Invalid argument while starting daemon Bug reassigned from package 'xen-hypervisor-4.4-amd64' to 'src:xen'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #808624 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug
2014 Feb 04
3
Bug#737613: xen-hypervisor-4.3-amd: Xen not loading dom0 on Jessie - FATAL error on running /etc/init.d/xen
Package: xen-hypervisor-4.3-amd64 Version: 4.3.0-3+b1 Severity: critical File: xen-hypervisor-4.3-amd Justification: breaks the whole system Dear Maintainer, Installation is a minimal system designed only to get dom0 working. The following are the uncommented GRUB commands GRUB_DEFAULT=0 GRUB_TIMEOUT=5 GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR=`lsb_release -i -s 2> /dev/null || echo Debian`
2014 Nov 24
0
Bug#737613: [Fwd: Debian Bug 737613]
[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]
2014 Nov 24
2
Bug#737613: Debian Bug 737613: Xen not loading dom0 on Jessie - FATAL error on running /etc/init.d/xen
Control: forcemerge 503287 737613 (making $subjet a bit more helpful this time too) On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 05:28:59PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > Before investigating any further can either of you confirm whether > this still happens with the version of Xen currently in Jessie, which > is 4.4.1-3 (and the current kernel too). That was a major version > bump, so it is worth
2015 Nov 06
0
Processed: forcibly merging 369042 503287 ...
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 369042 503287 Bug #369042 [src:xen] xen-utils-3.0: does not work with 32.bit userspace and 64-bit kernel Bug #369042 [src:xen] xen-utils-3.0: does not work with 32.bit userspace and 64-bit kernel Marked as found in versions xen/4.3.0-3. Added tag(s) upstream and moreinfo. Bug #503287 [src:xen] xen-3: domU's wont start when
2017 Dec 04
2
Samba 4.7.2 + bind on Fedora 27: samba_dlz: spnego update failed
Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 13.17 +0100, Christian Naumer via samba ha scritto: > Is > > /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/ > > accessible by bind? Yes, and selinux is disable [ root at server-addc ~]# find /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/ -ls 3149158 0 drwxrwx--- 3 root named 95 dic 4 14:03 /var/lib/samba/bind-dns/ 111 0 drwxrwx--- 3
2009 Dec 11
1
about --link-dest
Hello all: I don't know what I'm doing bad, but --link-dest does not work for me: I have three directories, the original one, the first copy and the second copy I want to populate: $ ls -li total 12 1761433 drwxr-xr-x 2 envite envite 4096 dic 10 14:04 copy1 1761434 drwxr-xr-x 2 envite envite 4096 dic 11 01:18 copy2 1761432 drwxr-xr-x 2 envite envite 4096 dic 10 14:04 origin $ ls -li *
2005 May 25
1
The error while using R2WinBUGS
Dear all, I tried to run WinBUGS model in R by using package R2WinBUGS, but I failed because of the massage : cannot calculate DIC for model in log file of WinBUGS14. In fact, the model works in WinBUGS and I can get summaries of the model, such as density, stats..., except DIC , because DIC may not be appropriate in this kind of model due to some reasons(according to the manual of WinBUGS14),
2016 Aug 03
3
cambiar nombres a una matriz
Hola a todos, Estoy teniendo problemas para cambiar el nombre de los factores. Mi matriz original es de la siguiente forma: > alfa local mes amb Fase sp1 sp2 sp3 sp4 L1-P1-C Ago.10 Lentico LFP 22.111664 0 0 0 L3-P3-M Ago.10 Lentico LFP 22.111664 5.527916 5.527916 0 P-1-C Ago.10 Lotico LFP 11.055832 0 0 0 P-3-M Ago.10 Lotico LFP 55.27916 5.527916 11.055832 0
2017 Dec 04
0
Samba 4.7.2 + bind on Fedora 27: samba_dlz: spnego update failed
Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 16.00 +0100, Dario Lesca via samba ha scritto: > The samba command > > samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately > > not work I have add '-d 9' to dlz section dlz "AD DNS Zone" { # For BIND 9.11.x database "dlopen /usr/lib64/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_11.so -d 9"; }; And this is
2018 Dec 12
0
Problem after upgrading to 4.9
about that systemd part.   systemctl daemon-reload systemctl samba-ad-dc stop   clear the logs in /va/log/samba   systemctl samba-ad-dc start   and and extra check on the dns part. sudo /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate --verbose and check your logs again to make sure your all ok.   Greetz,   Louis   Van: Sergio Belkin [mailto:sebelk at gmail.com] Verzonden: woensdag 12 december 2018 14:16 Aan:
2018 Dec 12
0
Problem after upgrading to 4.9
Hai, Can you post /etc/krb5.conf /etc/resolv.conf /etc/hosts Output off: samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs And last question, are there any DC removed from the domain. 50abc2a4-574d-40b3-9d66-ee4fd5fba076/0x00000005,localaddress=> 192.168.50.40] My guess here the UUID is a removed DC. You samba config looks fine to me. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >
2017 Dec 04
2
Samba 4.7.2 + bind on Fedora 27: samba_dlz: spnego update failed
On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:31:16 +0100 Dario Lesca via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 16.00 +0100, Dario Lesca via samba ha > scritto: > > The samba command > > > > samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names --fail-immediately > > > > not work > > I have add '-d 9' to dlz section > > dlz
2007 Jan 12
1
R2WinBugs and Compare DIC versus BIC or AIC
Dear All 1) I'm fitting spatial CAR models using R2Winbugs and although everything seems to go reasonably well (or I think so) the next message appears from WINBUGS 1.4 window: gen.inits() Command #Bugs: gen.inits cannot be executed (is greyed out) The question is if this message means that something is wrong and the results are consequently wrong, or Can I assume it as a simple warning
2014 Dec 18
0
Aw: Re: Re: rsync not copy all information for font file
ls -la Source folder ----------------------------********---------------------------------- root at ---:/BKP_SC//FONT# ls -la totale 2808 drwxr-sr-x 1 nobody 65533 944 giu 30 2010 . drwxr-sr-x 1 nobody 65533 1440 mar 18 2014 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 nobody 65533 12292 apr 20 2012 :2eDS_Store drwxr-sr-x 1 nobody 65533 880 giu 30 2010 .AppleDouble -rw-r--r-- 1 nobody 65533 0 mar 5 2010
2004 Sep 13
2
Update FC1 samba-3.0.6 breaks system
Hi! I have a curious problem. I updated my Fedora Core 1 box yesterday from samba-3.0.2 to samba-3.0.6. All the packages that were suggested by yum. I have the box join an NT4 Domain, and while yesterday before the update a smbstatus would list the users as CENTRUM+Username (CENTRUM is my NT Domain) today it refuses to do so, and any shares apart from the public ones are not available any
2014 Dec 18
3
Aw: Re: Re: rsync not copy all information for font file
Ram, ? Look inside the .AppleDouble folder and tou will find the resource forks that hold the main part of the font data. ? Not a 'problem' with netatalk, but just how netatalk works so that it can represent apple files on non-apple filesystems. ? ?If you confirm the data all matches, this will prove rsync is working properly. ? Bryan -------- Original message -------- From: Ram Ballu
2010 Sep 09
1
R2WinBugs problem
I'm having difficulty running R2WinBugs on a setup that previously worked for me (Dell Laptop, Windows XP service pack 3, R 2.11.1, WinBugs 1.43) . When I issue the following command smds.sim <- bugs (data, inits, parameters, "SMDSbrandLoc2.bug", debug = T, n.thin = n.thin, n.chains = n.chains, n.burnin = n.burnin, n.iter = n.iter) I get the following error in R
2018 Dec 12
3
Problem after upgrading to 4.9
Hi, I use the Van Bell repo, I've upgraded from samba 4.7 to samba 4.9 but now it fails, these are the errors: dic 12 09:14:49 samba4 samba[4881]: task[dnsupdate][4881]: [2018/12/12 09:14:49.372290, 0] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:327(samba_runcmd_io_handler) dic 12 09:14:49 samba4 samba[4881]: task[dnsupdate][4881]: /usr/sbin/samba_dnsupdate: Failed to bind to uuid
2017 Dec 04
0
Samba 4.7.2 + bind on Fedora 27: samba_dlz: spnego update failed
On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 15:34:37 +0100 Dario Lesca via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Il giorno lun, 04/12/2017 alle 12.07 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba ha > scritto: > > Is the DHCP server updating the records for you ? > > Yes, but for now the problem is not dhcp (see follow) > > > If so, you need to stop the windows clients trying to update their >