similar to: leftover bugs filed against Xen 3.x

user pkg-xen-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org usertag 271051 + close-after-first-upload usertag 326817 + probably-unreproducible usertag 331297 + probably-fixed usertag 321154 + probably-fixed usertag 327493 + pending-in-svn usertag 342249 + pending-in-svn usertag 321157 + pending-in-svn usertag 323698 + pending-in-svn thanks Hi! I'm user-tagging some of the bugs in the bts so we can keep a

Looking through http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=xen I think it would be useful to add some usertags, in particular to easily filter for toolstack specific (i.e xend) bugs. I think we can use the pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org namespace for this -- what do you think? Ian.

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:16:49PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > Looking through http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=xen I > think it would be useful to add some usertags, in particular to easily > filter for toolstack specific (i.e xend) bugs. I've never seen the use for this. The kernel team tried and it did not work well. The release team however uses them and like it.

Hi, I tried running xen3 (binary install) from xensource.com on an OpenSUSE box and it doesn´t work: I can not create any domUs: "Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connected. Hotplug scripts not working." Same problems with a clone of xen-unstable from today (8439) The xen rpms shipped from suse aren´t that stable too (7608-2) Questions Has anybody running a stable xen3 box on

hello! i think i have an very common problem. i want to run a distro based on a 2.4 kernel (Scientific Linux 3/Centos 3/RHEL 3) in xen3 as domu. the dom0 is a 2.6 based and works fine. so i think the way to go is to "simply" use an 2.6 kernel. but now i see there are several things which don''t work for example module-init-tools are missing and i expect problems with the glibc.

I followed the book called "Professional Xen Virtualization" written by William von Hagen,and published by Wiley Publishing,Inc. Here are some configuration files: #cat /xen/ubuntu/ubuntu.xen3.cfg kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-128.1.16.el5xen" ramdisk = "/boot/initrd-2.6.18-128.1.16.el5xen-no-scsi.img" memory = "512" name = "Ubuntu804" vif =

Anyone who wants to see what bugs might not have made it into xiph bugzilla may want to look at the urls below. Be sure to check the bugs marked as fixed in NMU since they may have patches that aren't in cvs yet. I'll try to be around to help verify the bugs are fixed before release tomorrow/monday. Thanks, Chris Cheney http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=libao

Hello All, I have been having a very difficult time getting any template to work on xen. Here is what I am running root@personal:/etc/xen-tools# xm info host : personal release : 2.6.22-14-xen version : #1 SMP Tue Feb 12 09:27:26 UTC 2008 machine : i686 nr_cpus : 2 nr_nodes : 1 sockets_per_node : 1

Kernel 2.6.12 contains a bad bug. So i need kernel 2.6.12.6. If i build Xen3 with make world it will still download/compile the old kernel 2.6.12. How can i build Xen3 with a newer kernel? Stephan <http://www.buchmesse.de/imperia/md/images/logos/fbm/2003/Logo100s150px.gif> 19. - 23. Oktober 2005 Halle 4.0 / Stand F1305 Reservieren Sie sich bereits heute über unsere Homepage

I have built a dom 0 using a Gentoo Linux kernel. All is up and running with no errors. I downloaded a Centos 4.4 image from the web and when I rum xm I get an error 22. Does anyone know what I am doing wrong and/or where I can find more documentation on running unmodified VMX guest domains. The Xen 3.0 Users Manual is out of date. Here is the control file: sun temp # cat

Package: libxen-dev Version: 4.6.0-1+nmu2 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships a broken symlink: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxlutil.so -> libxlutil.so. (notice the trailing dot, it is part of the target). You probably want this target instead: libxlutil-4.6.so Andreas

Hi Xen team, one short question before I grab the new machine of a colleague: did you build Xen3 for Sid with VMX (virtualization with the newer Vander...Pacifica)? Or will I have to build it myself? Sorry for the direct mail to this list, but I'm not subscribed to Debian-Users. Please CC me, as I'm also not subsribed here. Thx. kind regards, Wolfgang -- cheers,

Lets say you had 4 servers and you wanted to setup replicate and distribute. What methoid would be better: server sdb1 xen0 brick0 xen1 mirror0 xen2 brick1 xen3 mirror1 replicate block0 - brick0 mirror0 replicate block1 - brick1 mirror1 distribute unify - block0 block1 or server sdb1 sdb2 xen0 brick0 mirror3 xen1 brick1 mirror0 xen2 brick2 mirror1 xen3 brick3 mirror2 replicate block0 -

I understand that all work is going into xen3, but I had wanted to note that aoe (drivers/block/aoe) is giving me trouble on xen 2.0.6 (so we can keep and eye on xen3). Specifically I can''t see nor export AOE devices. As a quick background on AOE, it is not IP (not routable, etc), but works with broadcasts and packets to MAC addresses (see http://www.coraid.com). (for anyone who

Hi there We''re planning to buy a new server with a PentiumD with VT. Unfortunately we have some legacy server software which runs on Windows only and for that reason I have to install WindowsXP under Xen3. The problem is that I didn''t find too much documentation (tutorials, howtos, whatever) which describes installation and experiences with WinXP, besides some problem

Hi! I have a opteron machine running in 64bit mode. I would like to set up a Domain0 at 64bit and run 32bit domainU''s on top to use with other 32bit domains in regular x86 boxes for clustering.. Is this scenario possible, considering the use of Xen3 ? TIA -- Miguel Sousa Filipe _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Hi list, I''m running xen3 on verious systems and are very happy with the way it works. My set up is based on files as partitions but I have encountered a problem I can only create 4 partitions this way since all are primary partitions. Are there any solution to this problem other than move the domU''s to real partitions ? Thanks in advance Karsten

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # bugs with submitter debian at abeckmann.de > submitter 479445 ! Bug #479445 [gnuplot] gnuplot: wrong line numbers for missing files reported during replot Changed Bug submitter to 'Andreas Beckmann <anbe at debian.org>' from 'Andreas Beckmann <debian at abeckmann.de>' > submitter 681568 ! Bug #681568

Hello, we are using debian, xen 3.x and a iscsi-storage with ext4 as filesystem. Heartbeat is used for xen-ha. Now we like to change to xen 4 and remus. The iscsi SAN is available on active-Dom0 and backup-Dom0. I don´t have to use the disk buffering, as I understand remus right, because the file system on both machines is the same. With ext4 we don´t had problems at the xen3-Cluster on

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # bts housekeeping - fixing up versions to enable automatic bug archival > notfound 706747 3.2p1.4-28.1 Bug #706747 {Done: Andreas Beckmann <anbe at debian.org>} [olvwm] olvwm: fails to install [i386]: update-alternatives: error: alternative path /usr/bin/X11/olvwm-x-window-manager doesn't exist. There is no source info for the