similar to: loss of communication

> On Sep 14, 2020, at 9:12 PM, Joe Reid <jreid at vnet.net> wrote: > > rPi3 running current Buster. I get this far: > > # upsc networkups > Init SSL without certificate database > battery.charge: 100 > battery.charge.warning: 30 > battery.runtime: 2891 > battery.type: PbAC > device.mfr: Vertiv Co > device.model: Liebert PST5 > device.type: ups >

I'm getting 2 errors which are probably related, the second of which I haven't actually seen an issue with yet (I just found it looking at the error log) The issue is that I cannot change my subscriptions through Thunderbird (version 31.0). I created the subscriptions through Thunderbird, but now it won't let me change them. dovecot responds with sutff like this when I sniff

Hello, I wondered how folks monitored slaves. In my case, I am using Nagios and the check_ups plugin. It seems to work fine but being new to nut, I'm seeking confirmation that this is a sane approach. The goal: confirm the slaves have contact with the master. The environment: * FreeBSD 12.1 * nut-2.7.4 installed from package Background: I am replacing an APC 2200 UPS (still in use) with

Hello Devs of NetworkUPS Tool.Org, Like many people I have a UPS (CypberPower BR850ELCD) connected via USB to my Synology NAS but I would like my LAN clients (Apple Mac) to be able to get information about the status of the UPS, the UPS battery etc. Unfortunately, there isn’t a Network UPS Tools App on either the iOS or Mac App stores. Surely this would be a golden opportunity for

i think our strategy for privsep is to just keep portable sync'd closely with openbsd's tree, even though things will be broken wrt privsep for many platforms. then we just get primary one's working and work out issues as we go along. i'll start to work on sun and hp-ux again tomorrow.

On 8/8/2017 4:50 PM, Chris Olson wrote: > If we wanted to protect our CentOS systems from facility power failure > in a similar way, is there operating system or other standard support > that we might employ? Most of the Linux-based applications are not as > critical as the engineering applications on the Windows machines. There > is a significant amount of processor idle time on

Hello, I am working on getting NUT working with my Smart-UPS 900 UPS (with the C c= able) For several years, I have used the apcupsd product, but because of the nagios support for nut, I am working on switching over. Under apcupsd, I get tons of information from my UPS: # /usr/local/sbin/apcaccess status DATE : Sat Jul 09 12:56:41 CDT 2005 HOSTNAME : homer RELEASE : 3.8.6 UPSNAME :

If you don't use 'CERTVERIFY 1', then this will at least make sure that nobody can sniff your sessions without a large effort (...) > So, do I misunderstand CERTVERIFY directive ? Or is there a bug ? >> Can you reproduce such behaviour ? >> > > I'm not sure what is going on. Can you try running 'upsmon' with debugging > enabled? The following are

On Fri, Sep 4, 2020, at 5:19 PM, Roger Price wrote: > On Fri, 4 Sep 2020, Dan Langille wrote: > > > I wondered how folks monitored slaves. > > A NUT solution is to use a "heartbeat" generated in each slave and monitored in > say the master or elsewhere. I did find this earlier today: https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2017-April/010590.html Is

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 3 Aug 2014, Joe Reid wrote: > The time stamp on the .subscriptions.lock file gets updated every time I try > to make a change. To test I edited .subscriptions by hand and forced > Thunderbird to try to subscribe something and I got access to the folder I > added, so I presume it is reading the file correctly. > >

Some of our largest systems run Windows because it supports engineering applications that we use regularly.? These applications have unattended runs that often take between ten and fifteen hours to complete.? We have taken the recommendation of the application supplier and equipped these Windows machines with UPS protection for 30 minutes at full load. The UPSs are Ethernet connected.? A support

Hello, I was able to get the Vertiv/Liebert UPS (Vertiv Liebert PSA5 1500VA 900W - PSA5-1500MT120) to start working with NUT and "usbhid" driver, but would appreciate help to get it to work properly. Here's the output from the "upsc" command for a Cyberpower UPS I have: battery.charge: 100 battery.charge.low: 10 battery.charge.warning: 20 battery.mfr.date: CPS

Bruce Pleat via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes: > Here's the (far less lengthy) output for the Vertiv Liebert: > > device.mfr: Vertiv Co > device.model: Liebert PSA5 > device.serial: 22223106602D04C > device.type: ups > driver.name: usbhid-ups > driver.parameter.pollfreq: 30 > driver.parameter.pollinterval: 2 >

Hi, I didn't see in the HCL any Vertiv support. The specific unit I'm considering is: ( https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07BYD6RLN) - "Vertiv Liebert PSA5 1500VA 900W line-Interactive UPS with AVR Technology and Battery Backup, 10 outlets and Three-Year, Full Unit Replacement Warranty (PSA5-1500MT120)" Has anyone worked with this (or even UPS from Vertiv) and had success (or

Hi James, 2011/1/1 Among The Living <stinkysmellykid at gmail.com> > Hey there, > > After a few hours with tampering I got my UPS up and running. > > It's a "RocketFish 1025/1000va" (The model varies and is listed as > 1000va as well as 1025va). > > I got it working with the usbhid-ups driver, which I guess is a no > brainer :P. Just figured I'd

I wanted to mention I updated the Postfix and Dovecot SASL wiki entry yesterday. http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/PostfixAndDovecotSASL The entry: submission inet n - - - - smtpd was incorrect. It should be: submission inet n - n - - smtpd By specifying n for chroot, it ensures that DNS lookups can occur. Otherwise, if you are using reject_unknown_recipient_domain the following error will

hello I found the Nut project by chance and I wanted to know if it will serve my purpose. work with several brands of UPS (Eaton, CM, APC, Vertiv (Emerson)). I want to know if I could change parameters, update UPS battery and firmware, etc? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, I had an idea last week: why shut everything off (in my basement) when the power goes off (and run time goes below X minutes)? My idea: shutdown the big stuff first (two servers) leaving the little stuff (switches, wireless, gateway) running for a while longer. I might get another 30 minutes of internet that way. Let me watch a bit more streaming?. I?m convinced that idea is achievable

I'm trying to destroy a zfs array which I recently created. It contains nothing of value. # zpool status pool: storage state: ONLINE status: One or more devices could not be used because the label is missing or invalid. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state. action: Replace the device using 'zpool replace'.

Why wasn't there a FreeBSD security alert for Kerberos 5? Does FreeBSD use the MIT implementation? I got an email from CERT about this. See the attached message below. -- Daniel Rudy >From - Sat Sep 04 03:22:15 2004 X-UIDL: a8f31551eb03ca144862bddc8ccce266 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-Apparently-To: dcrudy@pacbell.net via 206.190.37.79; Fri, 03 Sep 2004