similar to: Fwd: [EXTERNAL] SNMP shutdown timing out

Is anyone using snmp-ups with the -k option successfully? This is really starting to look like a bug somewhere in nut, not a config problem. I've just tried the same command from a FBSD box with the same unfortunate result. Mind you, it could be the UPS card, I'm using the same one for both tests. : || nomad at castle nut-2.7.4 [93] ; please drivers/snmp-ups -a nutdev1 -x

I'm trying to get SNMPv3 management working for an APC AP9617 card. It is newly refurbed, running sumx v3.7.2 and aos v3.7.3. In the SNMPv3 user profiles section I have (I don't care about the password leaking, it's temporary): User Name: nut Authentication Passphrase: NutScan at Password43LongerWord Privacy Passphrase: NutScan at Password43LongerWord Authentication protocol:

I'm in the process of trying to get NUT to manage an APC SmartUPS. Monitoring of the UPS is working fine: $ upsc nutdev1 at localhost Init SSL without certificate database ambient.1.humidity.alarm.high: 60.00 ambient.1.humidity.alarm.low: 30.00 ambient.1.temperature.alarm.high: 40.00 ambient.1.temperature.alarm.low: 10.00 battery.charge: 94.00 battery.charge.restart: 0 battery.current: 0.00

Just a hunch about your snmpwalk, what happens if you format like this? snmpwalk -l authpriv -v 3 -u user -a MD5 -x DES -A authpassphrase -X privpassphrase {host address} so snmpwalk -l authpriv -v 3 -u nut -a MD5 -x DES -A NutScan at Password43LongerWord -X NutScan at Password43LongerWord apcups Thank you, David Zomaya Tripp Lite ________________________________ From: Nut-upsuser

Is NUT using the same SNMP v3 user as your SNMP Set or a different one? If it is a different one (e.g. an SNMP v1 or v2c string) does that user / community string have read/write access? tcpdump to listen for packets across UDP 161 is one way to check what is actually being sent. Thank you, David Zomaya Tripp Lite ________________________________ From: Nut-upsuser

Hi, Folks, I'm new to this admin game, and one of the hardest parts for me is figuring out where files/programs/data are stored in the file system. I think this is one of these situations. I've installed NUT on my Mac OS X 10.5 server, using the macports build. The machine is a dual processor G4 tower, connected to an APC UPS via USB. usbhid-ups seems to be working, see output

Short description: when upsmon starts it logs this to /var/log/messages: Jul 11 12:35:55 sorcerer upsmon[23902]: Startup successful Jul 11 12:35:55 sorcerer upsmon[23902]: user monuser not found Near as I can tell upsd is running properly. Long description: Centos 5 system (x86_64), built nut 2.2.2 from stable source with ./configure --with-usb --with-user=nut --with-group-nut make

Hello: would you please help me with the following glm question? for the R function glm, what I understand is: once you specify the "family", then the link function is fixed. My question is: is it possible I use, for example, "log" link function, but the estimation approach for the guassian family? Thanks, Shuangge Ma, Ph.D. ******************************************** *

On 4/28/20 1:58 PM, David Zomaya wrote: > snmpwalk -l authpriv -v 3 -u user -a MD5 -x DES -A authpassphrase -X > privpassphrase Evidently, even with argument identifiers order matters. That worked just fine and dandy. Now I guess I need to play with the order of the nut-scanner arguments to see if I get a similar result. thanks, nomad

Hi, I'm trying connect a device: * OS name and version: root at nut:/etc/nut# hostnamectl Static hostname: nut Icon name: computer-vm Chassis: vm Machine ID: d7a3b7fc724f4fe1a79a3d0eeff08f72 Boot ID: 40a561c464064b5184150f5909af0aa7 Virtualization: vmware Operating System: Debian GNU/Linux 9 (stretch) Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-9-amd64 Architecture: x86-64 * NUT version

Here is the upsc output: # /usr/local/ups/bin/snmp-ups -DD -a irs2-ups1 Network UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.68 (2.6.5) 0.000000 debug level is '2' 0.000327 SNMP UPS driver : entering upsdrv_initups() 0.000341 SNMP UPS driver : entering nut_snmp_init(snmp-ups) 0.056112 SNMP UPS driver : entering load_mib2nut(auto) 0.056126 trying the new

I have been working with NUT to get this working since upgrading to a web snmp card in a UPS. I keep getting seg faults when running snmp-ups also. Below is the output. kernel: [1365065.178230] snmp-ups[1940]: segfault at 0 ip b7555470 sp bf8d89e8 error 4 in libc-2.18.so[b74c2000+1a9000] Running: Arch i686 current Nut is current git Device is Tripp Lite SU2200XLa with WEBSNMPCARD running

Thanks for the quick response Charles! I may not have gotten the correct output from the snmpwalk, let me know if the attachment is usable. Thanks! New data added, here is the gdb output: Reading symbols from /usr/bin/snmp-ups...(no debugging symbols found)...done. (gdb) run -a tripplite -DD Starting program: /usr/bin/snmp-ups -a tripplite -DD warning: Could not load shared library symbols for

On 2/24/2014 11:10 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Feb 24, 2014, at 10:29 PM, Jason R Begley wrote: > >> Thanks for the quick response Charles! I may not have gotten the correct output from the snmpwalk, let me know if the attachment is usable. Thanks! > Sorry, it's basically all comments. Do you have the stdout from the subdriver script? Also, how is the MIB file installed?

Hi, Nut-upsusers, I am having problem configuring NUT to work with Tripplite UPS through SNMP. There is a Tripplite SmartOnline SU10KRT3/1X and attempts to monitor it using NUT though SNMP are failing... OS: Enterprise Linux 6, Nut version: 2.6.5. ups.conf is configured: [trippliteups] driver = snmp-ups port = 10.200.254.39 desc = "ProductionServer"

> If you have any more questions regarding this, please use the nut-upsuser > mailinglist instead. Redirected to the appropriate list, sorry. > > Is there a place in the upsmon.conf (or elsewhere) > > file where one may enter something like: > > > > OVERRIDE_BATTERY_CHARGE_LOW 20 > > OVERRIDE_BATTERY.LOW 240 > > > See 'man 8 upsrw'.

Hi all, We have recently bought an APC UPS and are in the process of setting up the NUT software to make use of it. We are experiencing a problem with the behaviour of the slave systems when the master system goes off line. Although the failure of our master system will (hopefully) be a rare event, and we hope not to experience too many power outages, it is possible (if unlikely) that both

Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> > > I believe some fixes were applied to the branch since your report (most visibly, about battery time settings), are you in position to test how it behaves now? :) Hi: I got another ups for testing. so I test the new commit for both APC SRT3000XL and SMT2200RM2U. the results below: 1. I get the new attribute "ups.test.result" for

Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> > > I believe some fixes were applied to the branch since your report (most visibly, about battery time settings), are you in position to test how it behaves now? :) Hi: I got another ups for testing. so I test the new commit for both APC SRT3000XL and SMT2200RM2U. the results below: 1. I get the new attribute "ups.test.result" for

Hi David On 4/29/20 3:28 PM, David Zomaya wrote: > Is NUT using the same SNMP v3 user as your SNMP Set or a different one? > > If it is a different one (e.g. an SNMP v1 or v2c string) does that user > / community string have read/write access? I tried setting them all with -x thing= arguments as well as letting it pull from ups.conf, same result. It's all SNMPv3 settings. sudo