similar to: Need nutdrv_atcl_usb for Windows port

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "Need nutdrv_atcl_usb for Windows port"

2017 Mar 10
2
Need nutdrv_atcl_usb for Windows port
UPDATE: I managed to build the windows port using a guide a user posted a while ago. I?ve also corrected a couple of variables like the SleepEx() function instead of the sleep() used in Linux. I?ve successfully compiled the EXE for nutdrv_atcl_usb but when I execute it via upsdrvctl it gives the following output: C:\MinGW\msys\1.0\home\Administrator\nut-2.6.5-7\drivers>nutdrv_atcl_usb
2017 Mar 11
1
Need nutdrv_atcl_usb for Windows port
Hello Charles and first of all, thank you so mucho for replying. I really appreciate your help. This is the guide I was talking about: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2016-April/007171.html All the versions of MinGW and msys plugins I'm using are exactly the ones listed on that guide written by Denis Serov. The procedure I used to compile is also the same as Denis
2015 Apr 13
1
NUTDRV_ATCL_USB driver on Windows
Hello again! I'm the guy from the blazer_usb shutdown problem the other day. Now I moved on installing the system in another work PC with another kind of rebranded UPS. This ups is a double battery 1000VA "UPS" brand. Device identifies itself as "ATCL FOR USB" on device description. Blazer_usb seems to identify it as compatible but fails at sending commands. Further
2015 Feb 09
0
RV: About your driver NUTDRV_ATCL_USB(8) for install
Dear Steve, Thanks. Until today I could not install the nut in my raspberry. All installation good, but with my ups " Ovislink Chrome 1000VA" and "nutdrv_atcl_usb" driver, it inform me the following error details. I can startup nut but nutmon don't receive anything only (lost conection). My setup: root at pi1:/nut# lsusb Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0424:9512 Standard
2014 Nov 06
0
nutdrv_atcl_usb
On Nov 5, 2014, at 4:39 PM, jani <jani.talikka at gmail.com> wrote: > The output of the ldd command is: > root at minime:~# ldd /lib/nut/nutdrv_atcl_usb > linux-gate.so.1 (0xb7722000) > libusb-0.1.so.4 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libusb-0.1.so.4 (0xb76fe000) > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0xb76e2000) >
2014 Nov 01
0
nutdrv_atcl_usb
Hi Charles, Here is the output of those. I also ran the driver a second time with debug level 4, just in case there were any extra hints in there. cheers, Jani On 1 November 2014 22:12, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 1, 2014, at 1:30 AM, jani wrote: > > Hi Charles, > > I just bought a UPS that announces itself as 'ATCL FOR UPS' with VendorId
2014 Nov 01
2
nutdrv_atcl_usb
On Nov 1, 2014, at 1:30 AM, jani wrote: > Hi Charles, > > I just bought a UPS that announces itself as 'ATCL FOR UPS' with VendorId of 0001. It seems to be a re-badged unit manufactured by Guangdong East Power company, and besides the little brand stamp it looks identical to: > http://eastups.com/en/productshow.aspx?CateId=473&Id=164&PCateId=447 > > It came
2017 Mar 11
0
Need nutdrv_atcl_usb for Windows port
On Mar 10, 2017, at 5:25 PM, hamberthm at gmail.com wrote: > > UPDATE: I managed to build the windows port using a guide a user posted a while ago. Which guide? > I?ve also corrected a couple of variables like the SleepEx() function instead of the sleep() used in Linux. I?ve successfully compiled the EXE for nutdrv_atcl_usb but when I execute it via upsdrvctl it gives the following
2014 Nov 04
0
nutdrv_atcl_usb
Hello again, I ran the commands again, checking to make sure the UPS was still device 005/002, and the results is: > root at microserver:~# ls -l /dev/bus/usb/005/002 > > crw-rw-r-- 1 root nut 189, 513 Nov 4 12:55 /dev/bus/usb/005/002 > > I tried setting permissions of /dev/bus/usb/005/002 to 777 and ran the test again to see what that would do, but there was no difference in the
2014 Nov 01
2
nutdrv_atcl_usb
On Nov 1, 2014, at 8:09 AM, jani <jani.talikka at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Charles, > > Here is the output of those. I also ran the driver a second time with debug level 4, just in case there were any extra hints in there. Here's the culprit: 5.338858 status interrupt read: error sending control message: Operation not permitted What does 'ls -l
2015 Mar 09
0
nutdrv_atcl_usb
2014-11-09 16:29 GMT+01:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: > On Nov 8, 2014, at 7:01 PM, hyouko at gmail.com wrote: > >> Since this UPS seems to be supported by UPSmart2000I, it could use a >> serial-over-usb implementation of the megatec protocol. > > Dan, that is a good point - I had not considered it. I assume companies will copy bogus product IDs, but the
2020 May 15
0
Unable to get NUT working
Hi all, just landed here so apologize. I've googled a lot but I can't find a way to get my UPS working with NUT. here my ( relevant ) details: lsusb ... ... Bus 001 Device 027: ID 0001:0000 Fry's Electronics ... ... lsusb -v -d 0001:0000 Bus 001 Device 027: ID 0001:0000 Fry's Electronics Device Descriptor: bLength 18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB
2014 Jul 24
3
RV: About your driver NUTDRV_ATCL_USB(8) for install
I think I may be of some help in this matter. Since I am running a bunch of Raspberry Pi's with NUT and it took a lot of hacking to make it possible. You could probably copy and paste this right into a shell script and just run it ... # Do an rpi-update FIRST to prevent USB strangeness #some depencies from repo sudo apt-get -y install m4 libtool libudev-dev automake #fixing autoconf for
2014 Nov 05
2
nutdrv_atcl_usb
The output of the ldd command is: root at minime:~# ldd /lib/nut/nutdrv_atcl_usb linux-gate.so.1 (0xb7722000) libusb-0.1.so.4 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libusb-0.1.so.4 (0xb76fe000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0 (0xb76e2000) libc.so.6 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb7536000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2
2014 Jul 24
0
RV: About your driver NUTDRV_ATCL_USB(8) for install
Dear Charles, Thanks for your quick reply, but I can't install nut_2.7.2 in my raspberry. 1) I create a [nut] directory and use wget to download three files: [nut_2.7.2-1.dsc] [nut_2.7.2.orig.tar.gz] [nut_2.7.2-1.debian.tar.xz] 2)I unpack: dpkg-source -x nut_2.7.2-1.dsc 3) I use command root at pi1:/nut/nut-2.7.2# debuild -us -uc . .. And I have the following error code:
2014 Jan 01
0
Generic UPS driver
On 31/12/13 21:00, Charles Lepple wrote: > > There is a very proof-of-concept-y driver (nutdrv_atcl_usb) in the atcl branch in GitHub. > > We can probably remove a bunch of the retry loops that it inherited from richcomm_usb. > > There should also be a tarball here fairly soon: > > http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/builders/Debian-x64-gcc/builds/115 >
2014 Jul 17
3
About your driver NUTDRV_ATCL_USB(8) for install
On Jul 13, 2014, at 9:46 AM, pere at riusnebot.com wrote: > Dear Charles Lepple, > Sorry for my email intrusion. for next time: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser > I have an UPS called Ovislink 1000VA and it use a UPSMART2000R (with ?ATCL FOR UPS?). > I?m a beginner Linux user and I ?will install your new driver <nutdrv_atcl_usb > to work
2015 Feb 09
0
About your driver NUTDRV_ATCL_USB(8) for install
Dear Chales, Thanks for your quick reply. I have Raspberry with last Kernel [Linux pi1 3.18.6+ #753 PREEMPT Sun Feb 8 14:47:22 GMT 2015 armv6l GNU/Linux] If <upsdrvctl>, <upsd> and <upsmon> are stopped <nutdrv_atcl_usb> Works well without any error as "Device or resource busy". If I run <upsc> command never receive any value from my ups <upsc ups at
2014 Jan 12
0
Generic UPS driver
On 11/01/14 15:27, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Jan 10, 2014, at 4:46 PM, Ariel Wainer wrote: > >> On 10/01/14 01:53, Charles Lepple wrote: >>> I am curious about why the Interrupt Out packet is sent by the Windows software if it isn't to turn off the UPS. Is it possible to do some more testing with shorter timeouts so that the battery doesn't get depleted? You would
2014 Nov 09
4
nutdrv_atcl_usb
On Nov 8, 2014, at 7:01 PM, hyouko at gmail.com wrote: > Since this UPS seems to be supported by UPSmart2000I, it could use a > serial-over-usb implementation of the megatec protocol. Dan, that is a good point - I had not considered it. I assume companies will copy bogus product IDs, but the use of the exact same USB string descriptor is odd. Did you have a chance to compare the rest of