similar to: Configure NUT slaves for D-Link 320 ShareCenter NUT master

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Configure NUT slaves for D-Link 320 ShareCenter NUT master"

2015 Sep 24
2
Configure NUT slaves for D-Link 320 ShareCenter NUT master
Hello, I have a UPS unit attached to the "D-Link 320 ShareCenter", a SOHO 2-bay NAS. I set up the UPS in "Master Mode". Unfortunately it doesn't supply any kind of useful info in the web interface, so I had to connect via ?nc' to port 3493 to get the proper UPS name. I manage to to issue a successful ?upsc? command: root at galois:~# upsc megatec at 192.168.3.6
2015 Sep 24
0
Configure NUT slaves for D-Link 320 ShareCenter NUT master
Hello, I have a UPS unit attached to the "D-Link 320 ShareCenter", a SOHO 2-bay NAS. I set up the UPS in "Master Mode". Unfortunately it doesn't supply any kind of useful info in the web interface, so I had to connect via ?nc' to port 3493 to get the proper UPS name. I manage to to issue a successful ?upsc? command: root at galois:~# upsc megatec at 192.168.3.6
2015 Sep 25
0
Configure NUT slaves for D-Link 320 ShareCenter NUT master
On Sep 24, 2015, at 5:20 PM, Panagiotis Atmatzidis <atma at convalesco.org> wrote: > > However there is a ?shadow? file which has a ?root? user. The password hash (md5) is not similar to ?admin? password which I use from the web-ui. Definitely something to check, but it would be a coincidence if that worked. NUT's upsd.users is designed to be separate from the system password
2009 Sep 01
1
Powerware 5110 UPS with nut in Ubuntu
2009/8/28 Thomas Zulliger <Thomas.Zulliger at quiksilver.com.au> > Hi Arnaud > Hi Thomas, > I'm experiencing exactly the same problem > > DNS-323 fun_plug Fonz > nut 2.4.1-1.tgz > powerware 3105 > using BCMXCP_usb > > /mnt/HD_a2/packages # lsusb > Bus 002 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 > Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0592:0002 Powerware Corp. > Bus 001
2010 Nov 30
0
ANN: HaLVM 1.0: the Haskell Lightweight Virtual Machine
Galois, Inc. is pleased to announce the immediate release of the Haskell Lightweight Virtual Machine (or HaLVM), version 1.0. The HaLVM is a port of the GHC runtime system to the Xen hypervisor, allowing programmers to create Haskell programs that run directly on Xen''s "bare metal." Internally, Galois has used this system in several projects with much success, and we hope
2017 Oct 06
2
rsync does hours of "fake-work" after failure
Hi, I just stepped on a strange and very annoying bug in rsync-3.1.0 as shipped with SuSE Linux Enterprise 12, but verified the bug also with rsync-HEAD-20170123. I tried to copy some of my movie collection to a usb disk that our TV could read, so it was formatted with vfat. I forgot that vfat can't handle files > 4 GB, and some of the movies were larger. rsync worked for 3 hours copying
2013 Nov 21
2
Samba 4.1 & NAS & openSuse13.1 - wrong disc volume
Hello, I would like to ask you for a help. I have new NAS server (NAS325 v2), new notebook and also new, just released, openSuse 13.1 where is Samba 4.1. I want to share my data from NAS to Notebook (via Samba because of other notebook with Win7 will access). In NAS I have set public folder and this folder I have put in fstab in notebook with a mounting point. All seems OK and after mounting I
2012 Oct 19
1
OpenSSH and Galois/Counter mode i.e. GCM
Hello, Are there any known efforts to implement RFC 5647 i.e. AES Galois Counter Mode for the Secure Shell Transport Layer Protocol for OpenSSH? If not, would OpenSSH project be interested in such feature? Thanks.
2014 Feb 25
1
Any plans to support standardized authenticated encryption?
Hi, I've been using Tinc for a couple years to encrypt some Samba shares on my home LAN. Today, I've been thinking about using Tinc to set up a VPN for VOIP/SIP traffic. I have reviewed the following pages of the Tinc documentation. Link 1 - http://tinc-vpn.org/documentation/Encryption-of-network-packets.html Link 2 - http://tinc-vpn.org/documentation/The-UDP-tunnel.html Link 3 -
1999 May 14
2
Parallel printer error
Hello folks: The introduction: Great product this Samba! The problem: I am trying to migrate an HP LaserJet 4 printer in our office off a VMS system and hang it directly off the back of a UNIX machine. I have created the new entry in the printcap (see below) file on that machine and can print from UNIX - no problem. I created the share in Samba with what I think works pretty well (see below).
2011 Jan 17
0
[LLVMdev] Fw: LLVM GC
Hi Sam, I've not actually gotten to the linking process with my runtime, as I've compiled it with clang -emit-llvm -c, and then archived it with llvm-ar and llvm-ranlib. I'm also not producing a GC plugin, as I'm using the builtin "shadow-stack" strategy. My current build process looks like this: 1. build the compiler 2. build the runtime using clang -emit-llvm -c
2011 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] Fw: LLVM GC
Forgot to CC the list. ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > To: Trevor Elliott <trevor at galois.com> > Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 7:33:15 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM GC > > Hi Trevor, > > Are you linking with LibStdC++ or LibC++? That is a requirement for running > code that has been compiled from C++
2016 Oct 14
2
LLVM/CLANG: CUDA compilation fail for inline assembly code
Hi, I am sorry for sending this query again here, but maybe I sent it to wrong list yesterday. I am trying to compile LonestarGPU-rev2.0 <http://iss.ices.utexas.edu/?p=projects/galois/lonestargpu/download> benchmark suite with LLVM/CLANG. This suite has a following piece of code (more info here
2020 Jul 09
2
[RFC] carry-less multiplication instruction
(As per IRC discussion) I understand that the carry-less multiplication algorithm has it's uses since/and it is implemented as an instruction in many architectures and that adding it as a general-purpose intrinsic will allow us to drop target-specific intrinsics as by-product. What i do *NOT* understand is: what is the actual/main goal/driving factor of adding an LLVM intrinsic for it? The
2015 Apr 21
0
fsd fails to notify slaves
On Apr 21, 2015, at 12:09 PM, dmanye <dmanye at urv.cat> wrote: > Apr 21 17:45:23 jessie641 upsmon[532]: FSD set on UPS smt750i at 10.21.102.241 failed: ERR ACCESS-DENIED > Apr 21 17:45:23 jessie641 upsmon[532]: Executing automatic power-fail shutdown > Apr 21 17:45:23 jessie641 upsmon[532]: Auto logout and shutdown proceeding > > i think the problem may be the first line.
2017 Oct 18
0
debian 8 "jessie" nut 2.7.2 slaves not shutting down
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017, Drew Plaster wrote: > ??????????????? there are three APC smart ups connected via usb cables > to the master system, the master system shuts down as expected but the > slave systems never shutdown eventhough I believe that all the configs > are properly set the slaves should either shutdown when there is only > one ups and it is running low on battery power
2017 Oct 19
0
debian 8 "jessie" nut 2.7.2 slaves not shutting down
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017, Drew Plaster wrote: > MASTER SYSTEM > > nut.conf > MODE=netserver > > ups.conf > [TOPAPC] > driver = usbhid-ups > port = auto > pollonly > serial = "IS1309002707" > desc = "TOPAPC" > [MIDAPC] > driver = usbhid-ups > port = auto > pollonly > serial =
2018 Apr 13
2
List of connected slaves
Hi, is there a command to get a list of connected slaves you can run on the nutserver? I want to monitor the slaves and if their are actually connected to server. Regards
2018 Apr 13
0
List of connected slaves
On 13/04/2018 07.56, zefanjas wrote: > Hi, > > is there a command to get a list of connected slaves you can run on the > nutserver? I want to monitor the slaves and if their are actually > connected to server. if there is no such command in NUT, then on my Debian Stretch using the lsof -p command on the upsd proccess on my NUT server reveals TCP connections to the clients. I
2018 Apr 13
0
List of connected slaves
Umm, the ups -c option "Lists each client connected on ups, one name per line." according to the man page and it has worked for me for a long time. --Larry On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:01 AM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 13, 2018, at 3:55 AM, Jon Bendtsen <jon.bendtsen at jonix.dk> wrote: > > > > On 13/04/2018 07.56, zefanjas wrote: