similar to: modbus driver for phoenix contact industrial UPS

Hi driver and pull request created, https://github.com/networkupst ools/nut/pull/404 tested and works fine. UPS configuration is needed, and included in the man page of the driver. Is there any indication on the usual time it takes for a driver to be checked/included on the master? (We are planning on setting up hundreds of those UPS boxes and it would be great to have an estimate) Kind Regards,

I attach a patch for phoenixcontact_modbus.c This patch does the following: * Marks driver as DRV_BETA * Fixes stale data detection when cable is disconnected I can open a pull request if needed. Kind Regards, -Spiros p.s. please consider a faster tag/release schedule as currently linux repositories include old versions. Sure we can make packages ourselves, but it's better to have support

On Sep 19, 2017, at 3:21 AM, Spiros Ioannou <sivann at gmail.com> wrote: > > I attach a patch for phoenixcontact_modbus.c > > This patch does the following: > > * Marks driver as DRV_BETA > * Fixes stale data detection when cable is disconnected > > I can open a pull request if needed. Looks good to me. Which email address do you want on the commit, gmail or

Hello, 1) I'm planning on adding lots of measurements to the driver liebert-esp2 + correct support for 3-phase systems. Should I make a large patch based on the last svn head or send you the whole file? Multiple patches per change are probably not practical in this case. 2) in http://www.networkupstools.org/doc/2.2.0/new-names.html there is no crest factor variable. Crest factor is very

I have succeded in defining the cdf of the generalized beta of the second kind, eg. pgbeta2 <- function(quint,b,a,p1,p2) { integrate(function(x) {exp(log(a)+(a*p1-1)*log(x)-(a*p1)*log(b)-log(beta(p1,p2))-(p1+p2)*log(1+(x/b)^a))},0,quint)$value } but I'm facing problems with the quantile function. I tried something like qgbeta2 <- function(proba,b,a,p1,p2) { optimize(function(z)

Yeah, I have its datasheet (it's a Xantrex XW invertor by the way). I do not know why creating a more-or-less generic driver is an issue. Of course, there are Modbus beasts that can scare everyone but mostly one would need to read either intreger or float numbers out of Modbus registers in order to decide whether or not to start or stop the shutdown process. 24 ???? 2017 ?. 19:25:14

Hi! I was wonering if there is a driver that supports communicating with a Modbus aware device over IP. I have a solar/wind invertor that can broadcast its state and I would like to monitor the batteries. If they discarge to a certain voltage or come to a defined state, I would perform a shutdown. All of this information id provided in Modbus holding registers. This could of course be done

Hello all, During holiday revision of issues (hoping to tie up loose ends and get to NUT v2.8.1 soonish), an old https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/50 ticket came to my attention - that some years ago "we" (as NUT community) wanted to create an unified driver for devices with a Modbus connection -- similar to `nutdrv_qx` doing everything about Megatec Qx protocol family

Hello all, During holiday revision of issues (hoping to tie up loose ends and get to NUT v2.8.1 soonish), an old https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/50 ticket came to my attention - that some years ago "we" (as NUT community) wanted to create an unified driver for devices with a Modbus connection -- similar to `nutdrv_qx` doing everything about Megatec Qx protocol family

On Jun 24, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Sergei Naumov wrote: > I was wonering if there is a driver that supports communicating with a Modbus aware device over IP. I have a solar/wind invertor that can broadcast its state and I would like to monitor the batteries. If they discarge to a certain voltage or come to a defined state, I would perform a shutdown. All of this information id provided in Modbus

Hello Ted, 2013/9/11 Ted Mittelstaedt <tedm at mittelstaedt.us> > Hi All, > > About a month ago APC announced they were including MODBUS protocol > support in their new APC UPSes. The technical note on this is here: > > http://www.apcmedia.com/**salestools/MPAO-98KJ7F/MPAO-**98KJ7F_R0_EN.pdf<http://www.apcmedia.com/salestools/MPAO-98KJ7F/MPAO-98KJ7F_R0_EN.pdf>

Hi, does anyone have any experience with UPSes managed with modbus/jbus protocol? I have a Socomec/Sicom Masterys MC unit, that is equipped with both RS232 and RS485 interfaces and, according to manual, supports JBUS-P and JBUS-PH protocols. I'd like to get some basic monitoring working, but I don't even know where to begin. Regards, -- Sebastian Zagrodzki Dzia? Sieciowy ICM,

Hi All, About a month ago APC announced they were including MODBUS protocol support in their new APC UPSes. The technical note on this is here: http://www.apcmedia.com/salestools/MPAO-98KJ7F/MPAO-98KJ7F_R0_EN.pdf "Application Note #176 Modbus Implementation in APC Smart-UPS" The APC "announcement" appeared on their site in their user blogs by an APC employee, here:

Hi Devs, do you have an estimate for a new release date? We want to deploy linux boxes which will include support for the newly contributed phoenixcontact_modbus driver. As we would like to create a package for both CentOS and an embedded Linux device we have, we would prefer if the package was based on a official release. If 2.7.5 is not coming soon (say 1 week) do you have a suggestion of a

2009/10/15 Farkas Levente <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> > hi, > i read your thread at: > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2009-January/003772.html > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2009-January/003775.html > we've got exactly the same problem that we need a nut driver for liebert > ups. is there any progress in this field?

Hello fellow NUTs :) It is my great pleasure to get a bit of sunshine from other people's work, and announce that the initial pull request for `apc_modbus` NUT driver has recently been merged to the main NUT codebase, so it would be part of an eventual 2.8.1 release. Great thanks go to Axel Gembe for the implementation, and to numerous community members for testing as well as their bug-fix

Hello fellow NUTs :) It is my great pleasure to get a bit of sunshine from other people's work, and announce that the initial pull request for `apc_modbus` NUT driver has recently been merged to the main NUT codebase, so it would be part of an eventual 2.8.1 release. Great thanks go to Axel Gembe for the implementation, and to numerous community members for testing as well as their bug-fix

As I'm trying to find the correct values for other UPS models and I only see correct values, please use the attached driver while compiling nut and please give me an output from upsc. I would like you to give me the output from upsc along with the correct values you get from Multilink or the LCD. The only thing that must be wrong are the multipliers. Thanks for your effort, -Spiros

Package 'quint' brought the number of packages on CRAN (for all platforms: some are Windows-only or non-Windows only) to 5000 a few minutes ago: see http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/index.html . -- Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861

Thanks again, Great to see confirmations of more and more things working! > I wonder what's the fastest method to test the function (previously I setup the ups and unplug the utility from the ups for testing). > is "upsrw driver.flag.allow_killpower=1" then "upscmd driver.killpower" the correct testing procedure? At least by intent of this new feature -- yes.