similar to: Dial(${PJSIP_DIAL_CONTACTS(Alice)} & ${PJSIP_DIAL_CONTACTS(Bob)}) how not to fail if one endpoint has no registered AOR?

Antonio G?mez Soto wrote: > > So basically, the 'contact' in the AOR is just an ip address (or > 'dynamic', in which case it accepts > incoming registrations). A contact is a SIP term, it's a way of getting to something. (IP address+port) > So what happens if one endpoint has multiple AOR's which are registered > from different ip addresses. > And

Hello everyone, I have started testing the PJSIP stack. I saw that it is possible to setup statically multiple AOR contacts, setup qualify_timeout and attach it to an endpoint, and then dial using this endpoint. When I setup the configuration I used the cli in order to see the status of the contacts, and it worked fine - whenever a contact is unreachable, the status is updated to Unavailable.

Hi, I'm facing a strange dialplan issue with a PJSIP_DIAL_CONTACTS. When I try to call an offline endpoint with PJSIP_DIAL_CONTACTS, the dial command breaks and the call control go to hangup block instead of next priority. The error in CLI says "*Dial requires an argument (technology/resource)*". This error seems legit as there are no contacts for an offline endpoint. The dialplan

>> So which option is preferred? >> >> A) Have a softphone aor/auth_user/password for a particular human, and >> expect them to configure it on multiple devices. Do not worry that 1) >> multiple are registered at once (because that's normal in SIP) and 2) >> asterisk has no idea which is which (because the intent is to place a >> call to

Thanks for responding, On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 5:45 PM, George Joseph <george.joseph at fairview5.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Antonio G?mez Soto < > antonio.gomez.soto at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I am slightly confused by the difference between chan_sip and pjsip. >> Especially the new (to me) objects aor and contact.

I just finished installing Asterisk 13 on our test server and I can now use PJSIP to register phones and make and receive calls. The only problem I am having is that when I register multiple phones to a single account only one of them rings. The AOR for the account has maxcontacts at 3. If I do a pjsip show endpoints I can see two "Contact" entries which I take to mean that

    Is there a solution to dial multiple contacts for a Queue agent?  Since the pandemic started many of our customers have begun to move agents off site.  Since most of them were using softphones we did not have any problems but now we have one case where the agents have a desk phone in their cubicle and are using a softphone from home.  For regular calls there is no problem as

I don't know why you have issues using different names. I have multiple AORs assigned to a single endpoint and it works fine. I have to admit that my AORs do contain the endpoint name, though. For example, for endpoint "myswitch" I have two AORs, "myswitch_1" and "myswitch_2", and I assign them to the endpoint with aors=myswitch_1,myswitch_2. When you say that

Dan Cropp wrote: > I am running asterisk 13.1.0 > > In pjsip.conf, the endpoint section has an aors and an auth field. > > I can name the auth field anything I want. The key is to set the > auth=field accordingly. > > However, when I try this with the aors field, it never works. It seems I > have to name the aors=field to match the name of the endpoint section. > >

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Antonio G?mez Soto < antonio.gomez.soto at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am slightly confused by the difference between chan_sip and pjsip. > Especially the new (to me) objects aor and contact. > > I am having trouble mapping them to the typical SIP configuration settings > on a phone. > There's some info on the wiki here...

Antonio G?mez Soto wrote: <snip> > > I did not mean they are the same, I meant that there seems to be a > one-to-one relationship. > > So I am wondering, since the auth does seem useless without an aor, but > an aor > can exist without an auth, why was the auth object created in the first > place, > instead of extending the aor object with username/password/etc

On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: > Antonio G?mez Soto wrote: > > <snip> > > >> I did not mean they are the same, I meant that there seems to be a >> one-to-one relationship. >> >> So I am wondering, since the auth does seem useless without an aor, but >> an aor >> can exist without an auth, why

I just realized that you are asking about dynamic AORs, not static Contacts in an AOR. That may be the difference. I have never actually tried giving a dynamic AOR a different name. And you wouldn't want more than one dynamic AOR, you'd just use an AOR that allowed more than 1 contact. On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:59 PM Trey Hilyard <kctrey at gmail.com> wrote: > I don't know

Joshua, On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote: [..snip..] > Also I notice, an AOR does seem do be directly correlated with an auth >> record, so why are >> they separate in the configuration, why not unify the aor and the auth >> objects? >> > > They aren't at all. Auth = Authentication. Used to authenticate

Le sam. 18 juil. 2020 à 08:02, Andrew Yager <andrew at rwts.com.au> a écrit : > Hi, > > I realise this is an old question, but I’m struggling to get my head > around it. > > The ERD suggests that endpoints can link to multiple AoRs > > In what situation would you actually use this? Given that mapping of > inbound calls is primary done to the endpoint, > In my

I am running asterisk 13.1.0 In pjsip.conf, the endpoint section has an aors and an auth field. I can name the auth field anything I want. The key is to set the auth=field accordingly. However, when I try this with the aors field, it never works. It seems I have to name the aors=field to match the name of the endpoint section. Is this correct? Would there ever be a need for multiple aors to

Hello, I am slightly confused by the difference between chan_sip and pjsip. Especially the new (to me) objects aor and contact. I am having trouble mapping them to the typical SIP configuration settings on a phone. Suppose I have a phone with two line buttons, for two extension numbers. Now, I think that means two 'endpoints' in pjsip right? But what exactly is the difference between

Hi, I realise this is an old question, but I’m struggling to get my head around it. The ERD suggests that endpoints can link to multiple AoRs In what situation would you actually use this? Given that mapping of inbound calls is primary done to the endpoint, it looks to me like most of the scenarios where this might be beneficial are actually not possible? One example I had envisaged was being

(I'm new to Asterisk, after having started VOIP with vat on the mbone in the 90s.) I am setting up my first Asterisk system, and trying to read docs/guidance and follow best practices. I have read the 5th Edition of "Asterisk: The Definitive Guide" and like the 3rd Edition on the web it recommends that hardphones and softphones both have a unique name distinct from any concept of

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Nathan Anderson <nathana at fsr.com> wrote: > What you want is called SIP call forking, and unfortunately, last time I checked (before Asterisk 12 and the advent of PJSIP), Asterisk's SIP channel driver does not support it, and I would be shocked if Asterisk 12+ changes this situation. You can even see that people have written and submitted patches