similar to: Detecting a fax

On 11/01/2019 09:19, Administrator TOOTAI wrote: > Le 11/01/2019 à 10:12, Neil Youngman a écrit : >> A while back, I posted about detecting when a call was picked up by a >> fax machine. It was suggested that having a "fax" extension and >> "faxdetect=yes" would cause it to jump to the "fax" extension. This >> was not something I could

I am trying to block/hide outgoing caller id on a PRI E1. It seems that it should be fairly simple, but it is defeating me. https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Function_CALLERID says: "to hide your caller id, use: Set(CALLERID(num-pres)=prohib)" That doesn't seem to do it. The calls are originated from AMI and I have tried a blank "CallerId:" line and

Is it feasible to enhance AMD to detect and report if the far end sends fax tones? I am guessing that, as it is using DSP to detect sounds and periods of silence, the same DSP can also report if a CED tone is sent. If it is feasible, is there a document describing the DSP interface that someone who is not familiar with DSP can use to get started? Neil Youngman Neil Youngman Developer Wirefast

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-amd64 Version: 3.2.0-5 Severity: important The hypervisor loads OK but then fails to load my dom0 kernel. I get an erorr message "not an ELF binary" followed after 5s by a hypervisor reboot. /boot/grub/grub.cfg contains: menuentry "Debian GNU/Linux, Xen 3.2-1-amd64, Linux 2.6.22-3-vserver-amd64 (single-user mode)" { set root=(hd0,1)

Is anyone else using the AMI with res_fax_spandsp.so for real-time status? I am working on migrating a FAX application from res_fax_digium.so to res_fax_spandsp.so. I have noticed that the spandsp module generates far fewer AMI status events than the Digium module and the generated events contain less information. For example when sending a fax there is no longer an event for every page. There

hi all, you'll have to excuse the ignorance (i'm a software guy, not a telcom guy..) Is there any way to know if a channel has been answered by an automatic system (like voicemail) rather than a human being? Specifically, I want to use a .call to make a call on a channel and only do something if a person answers, not a machine of any kind. Is this even possible, or is an answered

Are there instructions anywhere for setting up dom0 under Debian Lenny on amd64? Are there suitable Debian packages? James. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Sorry for the delay, we were too busy drinking and playing with explosives yesterday. :) Here are some tests. We did one on a similar machine and it worked. We deleted the configuration file, obviously. # Dell OptiPlex GX620 ISOLINUX 5.11 5.11-pre7 isolinux: Starting up, DL = 82 isolinux: Loaded spec packet OK, drive = 82 isolinux: Main image LBA = 00000115 isolinux: Image checksum error,

Hi all, I've a simple program called empty.c :) $ cat empty.c int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { return 0; } $ cat empty410.s .file "empty.c" .text .p2align 4,,15 .globl main .type main, @function main: xorl %eax, %eax ret .size main, .-main .ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.1.0 20050922 (experimental)"

I have a new Centos installation that has an empty /home dir and there are no users...just root. I want to move the home directory from another server to the new one. At this time the old /home directory has been tarred with "-prf". That will keep permissions which could be a problem. Is there a simple way to move the /home directory? And the non-system users in the password

Hi all, i'm trying to make AMD, Answer Machine Detection, to work on my outbound context but i can't get it to work, just on inbound context like whe i use the application Answer before AMD, but i need to make AMD to do the detection on an outbound predictive dialer integration. Follow are the inbound and outbound examples. My current environment is Asterisk 1.4beta3 and a Digum

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 4:55 PM antlists via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 19/06/2020 20:43, Matt Arsenault via llvm-dev wrote: > > > > > >> On Jun 19, 2020, at 15:38, Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev > >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > >> > >> I'm interested to hear

Hello, I would like to use AMD on outgoing calls using analog line. I tested with SPA3102 and cisco2811 as gw and asterisk 1.8.26.1 as well as 11.8.1 Other end is analog number behind another cisco/asterisk, also tested calling a mobile number with the same result. What I did: dial is done like exten => s,n,Dial(SIP/<IP gw>/<dialed number>,,M(myMacro)), which tell Asterisk to

Hi I am using the AMD application in a power dialing. All works well when I use an internal extension but when I try to use an external number, the AMD every times returns non human status. Also the AMDCAUSE returns Total-Time-5500. I am using the default parameters in AMD.CONF. Anybody has some idea? Thanks Sergio -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Patrick Verner <distrozilla at gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry for the delay, we were too busy drinking and playing with explosives > yesterday. :) No problem. Many do that here. > Here are some tests. We did one on a similar machine and it worked. > We deleted the configuration file, obviously. > > # Dell OptiPlex GX620 > ISOLINUX 5.11

I am running Asterisk and using Answer machine detection with call files on a virtual Vcloud server running Centos 5.3 and LAMP. I am finding that AMD is only detecting HUMAN or MACHINE for about 30% of the calls (I sent over 50,000 outbound calls last week, and 70% said NOTSURE). I have a suspicion that the problem may be due to the timing source on virtual server when its under load delivering

Apologies for cross-posting ... This project is looking for a maintainer. To quote from the Goose web site: "Goose is a LGPLed C++ library dedicated to statistical computation. The two design goals of this project are: To create a useful and complete system that takes advantage of C++'s features to improve the clarity of statistical code and that is easier to use for programmers. To

> Here are some tests. We did one on a similar machine and it worked. > We deleted the configuration file, obviously. > > # Dell OptiPlex GX620 > ISOLINUX 5.11 5.11-pre7 > isolinux: Starting up, DL = 82 > isolinux: Loaded spec packet OK, drive = 82 > isolinux: Main image LBA = 00000115 > isolinux: Image checksum error, sorry... > > # Dell OptiPlex GX620 >

I'm not exactly sure what you need. Is this it? ISOLINUX 4.06 0x513e88f5 isolinux: Starting up, DL = 82 isolinux: Loaded spec packet OK, drive = 82 isolinux: Main image LBA = 0000011D isolinux: Main image read, jumping to main code... I created an iso with isolinux-debug.bin as the boot loader and booted it on that machine. If this is not what you are looking for, what are correct steps?

Same CD. Any Linux distribution without the 5.X series boots on this machine. We can use 4.06 and it boots just fine. It's not the computer's hardware. Like I said, we can take the CD out of the GX620 and place it in the 9010 and it boots. Put 4.06 on the CD, and they both boot. Patrick On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 5,