similar to: hangup the _called_ channel ?

On 9/12/18 1:22 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, at 2:19 PM, sean darcy wrote: >> I understand that HangUp() hangs up the calling channel. I want to >> hangup the called channel. >> >> SIP/mycall-xxxxx calls and bridges with DAHDI/1-1. >> >> I send SIP/.... to listen to a long, very long, file. > > Define "send". How are you

I've tried to create a subroutine that sets callerid name based on number. extensions.conf: ........... exten => s,1,Answer() exten => s,n,GoSub(set-callerid-name,0${CALLERID(num)},1) exten => s,n,Dial(${mainline},60) ....... [set-callerid-name] exten => 0,1,NoOp( no CALLERID num set) exten => 02025462677,1,Set(CALLERID(name) = "Fred" ) ................ exten =>

Hi, For some reason (outbound call tracking) I've got a few different outbound call process (using a macro for queuemetrics logging, or direct call) i wanted to factorise the routing process so i came up with something like the following. All in one it's working like expected, however every "ael reload" command trigger a lot of warning like that "application call

Hello! I need to use n-way call as it described here: http://habrahabr.ru/sandbox/52259/ It is in russian, but dial plan is quite clear. It works in asterisk 11: -- Blind transferring OOH323/7272-6385 to '0' (context fromtransfer) priority 1 -- Executing [0 at fromtransfer:1] NoOp("OOH323/7272-6385", "") in new stack -- Executing [0 at fromtransfer:1]

I've have a simple caller id lookup on incoming: [teliax-in] .......... exten =>s,n,GoSub(set-callerid-name,0${CALLERID(num)},1) ................ [set-callerid-name] exten => 0,1,NoOp( no CALLERID num set) exten => 02135590993,1,Set(CALLERID(name)=Matthew ) ............................................... exten => _0!,n,NoOp(CALLERID: ${CALLERID(name)}) exten => _0!,n,Return()

For our internal fax machines, I'm checking if the faxes are going to branch offices. If they are, I want to capture and email them to the branches. I've set up extension 8447 to test this. A fax machines is connected via an SPA 2102 on 173. Any calls from 173 are sent to: [outbound-fax] exten => 8447,1,Answer() exten => 8447,n,GoSub(Capture-Fax,s,1) exten

This is a small 12 line system, internal extensions 150 - 180. I didn't have a phone on 151. Here's the sip.conf stanza: ;;[151] ;;type=friend ;;context=longdistance ;;callerid="Conf Room" <151> ;;secret=0000 ;;host=dynamic ;;qualify=yes ;;dtmfmode=rfc2833 ;;allow=all ;;defaultuser=151 ;;nat=yes ;;canreinvite=no There's no DISA. And then somehow (how???) ip address

Dear R-devel: The following code seems to allow one function to permanently modify a calling function. I did not expect this would be allowed (short of more creative gymnastics) and wonder if it is really intended. (I can see other ways to accomplish the intended task of this code [e.g. via match.call instead of substitute below] that do not trigger the problem, but I don't think that is

Hello there! Somebody tried the meetme|b which initiates the conf-background AGI. Actually I want to originate another call from a conference.my AGI originates the call and connects it to the conference, but the calleeee is nowhere My extension exten => 21,1,meetme(21|pb) and my AGI **************************************************************************** #!/usr/bin/perl -w

Hello everybody!!! I really need your help guys, I am using the AGI mode in meetme application, and I want that AGI should wait for an input from the client/user i.e. a digit and then proceed, but I have used that AGI function agi->wait_for_digit(), but no use....my agi just passes, or ignores this function, where AGI should stop here and wait for the input.... .....my extension in my

Hi all, assume the following problem: a function call takes a function object and a data variable and calls this function with this data on a remote host. It uses serialization to pass both the function and the data via a socket connection to a remote host. The problem is that depending on the way we call the same construct, the function may be serialized to include the data, which was not

hi, I hope someone can help me:-) we’ve got a freepbx server. there are 2 special extensions (2001, 2002). if someone calls this extensions (or a call is forwarded to these extensions) and these extension hangup (not the caller party), then we’d like to put the calls back into a queue (1000) and wouldn’t like to hangup. I read your description about hangup hooks:

Hi, I am using asterisk 1.4.28 with freepbx and Wildcard TDM410P card. Everything is working fine except the caller ID of incoming call from PSTN line. The phone display is showing "Unknown" when there is an incoming call. *My log file showing this while an incoming call on PSTN line:* tail -f /var/log/asterisk/full [Dec 30 06:36:16] DEBUG[2559] dsp.c: dsp busy pattern set to 0,0

Hi R-Helpers: I?m trying to fit the same linear model to a bunch of variables in a data frame, so I was trying to adapt the codes John Fox, Spencer Graves and Peter Dalgaard proposed and discused yesterday on this e-mail list: for (y in df[, 3:5]) { mod = lm(y ~ Trt*Dose, data = x, contrasts = list(Trt = contr.sum, Dose = contr.sum)) Anova(mod, type = "III") } ## by John Fox or for

First off this is not my work for extensions.conf it is modified from http://leifmadsen.wordpress.com/2009/07/15/migrating-from-agentcallbackl ogin-to-standard-dialplan-methods-part-1/ So credit to Leif Madsen <http://www.leifmadsen.com> But as to my question [AgentLogin] ;A replaced version of AgentCallbackLogin() using a GoSub() ; exten =>

Hi, I didn't notice on my first answer, but we are on the -dev list and this is not related to asterisk code developing. I will answer you on the -users list, so we can continue the discussion there. Cheers, -- Ing. Miguel Molina Grupo de Tecnolog?a Millenium Phone Center Anahi Ludue?a escribi?: > Hi, thanks Miguel. > I have another question: if I want to call the GoSub

Hi, I am using asterisknow 1.5.0 and Wildcard TDM410P card. Everything is working fine except the caller ID of incoming call from PSTN line. The phone display is showing "Unknown" when there is an incoming call. I think the same problem listed here: https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=6683 There is one patch on this link but i don't know how to apply patch on asterisknow.

As best i could figure it out, I've installed dahdi and rc4. My TDM400P doesn't answer fxo or fxs. /etc/dahdi/system.conf: loadzone = us defaultzone=us fxoks=1,2 fxsks=4 /etc/asterisk/chan_dahdi.conf: [house-phones] context=internal ; Uses the [internal] context in extensions.conf signalling=fxo_ks ; fxo_ks Use FXO signalling for an FXS chanel dahdichan => 1 ;

I'd like to have an extension "join" a call. That is, C can join A and B, just as if it were an analog extension phone. ChanSpy works, sort of. The problem is that once A or B hangs up, the channel is gone. With an analog extension, C would remain connected with B if A hung up. Can I throw A and B into a confbridge and then add C? Create a new channel that grabs the A

Have you enabled DTMF logging and seen the DTMF codes being recognised by Asterisk? I had a bunch of soft phones that I had to change to using ?sip info? for the DTMF signalling as the RFC signalling was not always being recognised. This would cause transfers to appear as if the user had not dialled any digits. On 20/12/2014 20:52, "sean darcy" <seandarcy2 at gmail.com> wrote: