similar to: Looking for better fax handling

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "Looking for better fax handling"

2019 Dec 03
2
Faxes stopped working - AMI issue?
On 12/2/19 11:52 AM, Joshua C. Colp wrote: > So I know that AMI is listening and I can talk to it.  Here is the > main log" > > [Nov 27 06:16:00] VERBOSE[101155] asterisk.c: Remote UNIX connection > [Nov 27 06:16:00] VERBOSE[101245] asterisk.c: Remote UNIX connection > disconnected > [Nov 27 06:16:01] VERBOSE[101244] manager.c: Manager
2019 Nov 27
2
Faxes stopped working - AMI issue?
I recently upgraded from Asterisk 13.19 to 16.6.1. Everything is working fine with a few minor tweaks except outgoinf fax. Incoming works fine. I do outgoing faxing through an AMI call. Here is the output from the security log: [Nov 27 06:16:05] SECURITY[101222] res_security_log.c:
2019 Dec 03
2
Faxes stopped working - AMI issue?
On 12/3/19 3:04 PM, Joshua C. Colp wrote: > >     The AMI command, after the login, looks like this: > > > >     Action: Originate > >     Channel: SIP/outgoing/%%(destination)s > >     Context: LocalSets > >     CallerID: Vybe Consulting Inc Fax Service <5555551212> > >     Exten: sendfax > >   
2018 Jun 08
3
T-38 re-invite issue
I have an error sending to a specific fax number. It may be more than one but this is the one I investigated. It seems the delay for the SIP negotiation in T.38 was initiated after 6 seconds, however, our system sent the BYE after only 4 seconds, possibly cutting the call before all the communication necessary for the negotiation was completed. Here is the trace from our provider showing their
2018 Jun 13
2
T-38 re-invite issue
>>>>> D'Arcy Cain <darcy at VybeNetworks.com> writes: >> Ie after both sides select t38, until they agree on the t38 terms. > OK, so does that mean that setting it to 25000 should leave time for the > re-invite or does the timeout start after that. As I wrote above, after that. After the sip/sdp. -JimC -- James Cloos <cloos at jhcloos.com>
2020 Apr 02
2
Can't block intrusion
On 2/04/2020 6:35 AM, D'Arcy Cain wrote: > On 2020-04-01 16:28, Mark Boyce wrote: >> On 1 Apr 2020, at 22:14, Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com >> <mailto:gdt at lexort.com>> wrote: >>> I think you need to use tcpdump and turn up firewall debugging. >> sngrep is your friend …My bet is UDP vs TCP on firewall rules :-) > block drop in log quick on bge0
2020 Apr 01
5
Can't block intrusion
On 1 Apr 2020, at 22:14, Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote: > > I think you need to use tcpdump and turn up firewall debugging. sngrep is your friend …My bet is UDP vs TCP on firewall rules :-) Mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2017 Apr 18
4
Voicemail asking for login
On 2017-04-18 02:42 AM, Pete Mundy wrote: > Try this: > > asterisk -r > core set verbose 10 > [get user to trigger fault] > [examine console output, and post to list if still unclear] > > If you don't solve it yourself, then we'll be able to help further once > we've seen the output. I can't see much more than at my previous debug level but here it is
2020 Apr 01
2
Can't block intrusion
I am running Asterisk 16.9 on FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE-p1. I keep seeing lines like this in my logs. [Apr 1 13:30:33] NOTICE[101155][C-00004526] chan_sip.c: Call from '' (45.143.220.235:5356) to extension '2037' rejected because extension not found in context 'unauthenticated'. I have a script that checks for things like this and adds them to my packet filter (pf).
2017 Apr 19
2
Voicemail asking for login
On 2017-04-18 08:31 PM, Victor Villarreal wrote: > Maybe excecuting the following command at Asterisk console, will help you: > > asterisk> voicemail show users > > And you will get a list of all mailbox configured in your system. Search > for the user with problems. VoiceMail stocktrans2 Angelica Douglas 12 Definitely there. In fact, I generate all
2018 May 22
2
Looking for better fax handling
On 2018-05-22 02:17 AM, Yves wrote: > you could > > - use "global variables" > - use the asterisk built in database Both of those seem difficult as the process is split between Asterisk and an external script. > - mv the file to temporary folder _before_ faxing (would be the most > easy solution as you already > know how to mv a file via asterisk...) True. This
2018 Jun 12
2
T-38 re-invite issue
>>>>> "DC" == D'Arcy Cain <darcy at VybeNetworks.com> writes: DC> Perhaps someone can explain what t38timeout is supposed to do A 'git grep t38timeout' on the src leads one to res/res_fax.c, where one case see that it is the number of miliseconds to permit for t38 negotiation to complete once it starts. Ie after both sides select t38, until they
2017 Apr 19
2
Voicemail asking for login
On 2017-04-18 08:17 PM, Pete Mundy wrote: >> On 19/04/2017, at 7:58 am, D'Arcy Cain <darcy at VybeNetworks.com >> <mailto:darcy at VybeNetworks.com>> wrote: >> >> <snip> >> Everything looks the same as another one that works except for two >> things. The one that works doesn't have the "Probation passed" lines. >> I am
2017 Apr 19
2
Voicemail asking for login
On 2017-04-19 11:57 AM, J Montoya or A J Stiles wrote: > I fished this out of an old extensions.conf from a defunct project. It might > be relevant to your use case: > > exten => 1571,1,NoOp(Call to 1571: voicemail retrieval) > exten => 1571,n,AGI(lookup_caller_id.agi,${CALLERID(num)}) > exten => 1571,n,NoOp(CLID is ${clid}) > exten =>
2017 Apr 19
2
Voicemail asking for login
On 2017-04-19 02:39 AM, Pete Mundy wrote: > Hmm... Above my pay grade I'm afraid! Looking at your 'voicemail > show users' I can't see why the vm_authenticate function is > failing to read the username :( I can answer that one. It's because we can't enter 'stocktrans2' from a telephone so we just hang up. The question is, why does it ask for the
2017 Apr 20
2
Voicemail asking for login
On 2017-04-20 05:14 AM, J Montoya or A J Stiles wrote: > This is just screaming "configuration mismatch" -- or, possibly, "latent bug > whereby things parsed in separate places should be treated the same, but are > actually getting treated differently". I really don't want to be the "my system isn't working so there must be a bug in Asterisk" guy
2014 Dec 23
1
ReceiveFax for multiple page (asterisk 13.0.1)
Hi all, I have problem for receiving fax from multiple page fax that sent from fax machine (analog). The error is : WARNING T.30 Page did not end cleanly This is my dialplan [inboundfax] exten => s,1,NoOp(**** FAX RECEIVED from ${CALLERID(num)} ${STRFTIME(${EPOCH},,%c)} ****) exten => s,n,Set(FAXOPT(ecm)=yes) exten =>
2010 Jan 04
1
Free FaxForAsterisk ReceiveFAX not working
Hello users, Recently i have installed the free version of FaxForAsterisk and trying to work with it by sending a fax on T38. My version information is as follows i)Asterisk 1.6.0.20 ii)res_fax-1.6.0.14_1.1.6-x86_32 iii)res_fax_digium-1.6.0.14_1.1.6-i686_32 sip.conf [general] t38pt_udptl=yes extensions.conf [default] exten => _XXXXXXXXXX,1,NoOp(Fax Incoming Call) exten =>
2010 Jul 12
1
Fax for Asterisk, capable of receiving from website but not from fax machine !!
Hi Guys, i am using the latest version of asterisk 1.4 (1.4.33.1), dahdi (2.3.0.1) and FFA (Applications: 1.4_1.2.0, Digium FAX Driver: 1.4_1.2.0). the issue i'm having is that i'm able to receive faxes from a website (that offer this service) but not able to receive from a regular fax machine (that is working perfect). [fax-rx] exten => receive,1,NoOp(**** FAX RECEIVE ****) exten
2011 Feb 21
1
Dialplan execution stops on app call even with TryExec (Am I missing something simple?)
We're having an issue where we call ReceiveFax in a context that includes a hangup extension and half the time dialplan execution doesn't continue after the fax is received successfully. Am I missing something simple here? Below is a sample call where this happened: The last log line for this channel/call is: [Feb 21 09:10:53] VERBOSE[13730] res_fax_digium.c: -- Channel