similar to: Gerrit usage?

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Robinson, Paul via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of > > Justin Lebar via llvm-dev > > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 1:32 PM > > To: Chris Bieneman > > Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > >

The LLVM incubator projects have been using github PRs for reviews and so far haven't really seen any significant issues. The biggest confusion so far has not been with reviews but with the difference between "rebase and merge" and "squash and mere". We have used basically 3 different processes: Method 1: start a review with one commit on a new branch (typically in a

Has anyone tried out reviewable.io yet? It integrates with GitHub pull requests, but provides a separate UI for doing the review which promises to fix a lot of the issues encountered with Github's review interface. Some of the things it claims to support which seem like important additions: - Tracking the resolved status of each discussion point - Rebasing a PR without losing review history.

Uh-oh: Failed to publish: GitHub error 404 on POST https://api.github.com/repos/llvm/mlir-npcomp/pulls/42/reviews: Not Found (The llvm organization may need to authorize Reviewable as an accepted third party application.) Can an admin take the suggested action on the mlir-npcomp project in the LLVM org? I've followed the instructions in this help doc

> -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of > Justin Lebar via llvm-dev > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 1:32 PM > To: Chris Bieneman > Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [RFC] One or many git repositories? > > Thanks for elaborating, Chris. > > > Case Study 1 - Simple development

On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 12:28, Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle at gmail.com> wrote: > I don't quite follow. Yes, gratuitous useless changes tend to create > merge and rebase problems and should generally be avoided. Why does it > make a difference whether they're in multiple commits though? I think you misunderstood. Our policy [1] is that independent NFC fixups on existing code

Thanks for elaborating, Chris. > Case Study 1 - Simple development on a sub-project I explicitly addressed this workflow in my original e-mail. I know it was a while ago, but it sounds like it may be worth a read if you haven't checked it out. In the mail I described how to use sparse checkouts to create a repository structure that functions virtually identically to what you have today.

Greg Fitzgerald <garious at gmail.com> writes: >> I've yet to see anyone propose this. Oh, many people have proposed using git's features. > Then I'll be the first.  :) > > The benefit is that the review process would require no file copies or > email attachments, shorter email conversations, no copying code during > reviews to simulate inline comments,

Hi, Anne, assign Age and Bloodpressure in the correct order to the axes in your call to plot as in: plot(y = Age, x = BloodPressure) abline(SimpleLinearReg1) Hth -- Gerrit --------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Gerrit Eichner Mathematical Institute, Room 212 gerrit.eichner at math.uni-giessen.de Justus-Liebig-University Giessen Tel:

Can't find a way to control the dtmf mode on a per session basis with pjsip, used to use SIPDtmfMode from the dialplan with chan_sip. Any hints on how to do this?

We are looking to implement a code review system that will require a review of the code before it gets to production servers. I have been looking into many different options, and would love some feedback and experiences from other users. Our puppet is in a git repo. We have 3 primary environments with a branch of puppet for each of them. All of our puppet info is in the git repo

Dear Gerrit, This issue is discussed in a vignette in the car package (both for functions in the car and effects packages): vignette("embedding", package="car") . The solution suggested there is the essentially the one that you used. I hope this helps, John ----------------------------- John Fox, Professor Emeritus McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Web:

Hi, again, I have to modify my query since my first (too simple) example doesn't reflect my actual problem. Second try: When asking Effect() inside a function to compute an effect of an lmer-fit which uses a data frame local to the body of the function, as in the following example (simplifying my actual application), I get the "Error in is.data.frame(data) : object 'X' not

Hi Richard, We've added zero and flush functionality to imageio-daemon. You can download and test the latest build (for el7/fc) from: - http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-imageio_master_build-artifacts-el7-x86_64/200/artifact/exported-artifacts/ - http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-imageio_master_build-artifacts-fc27-x86_64/53/artifact/exported-artifacts/ -

On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 12:41:05PM -0500, Arthur O'Dwyer via cfe-dev wrote: > I know GitHub can be configured to reject force-pushes to {any, a > specific} branch. I strongly suspect that if *the maintainers of > LLVM* asked nicely, GitHub would also be able to reject > merges to {any, a specific} branch. Anyone with admin permissions in a repo can add "branch protection

Dear Gerrit Thanks a lot. "rbind" seems to be the right function. Unfortunately there is a shift in the x-axis (see pdf). There are 52 trapcatch values each, m and w, but m$trapcatch and w$trapcatch are shifted up to x-value 60. The follow-up lines for temp and humidity are fine. Thanks Sibylle setwd("~/Desktop/DatenLogger2017") # am Mac sks trap =

Hello, everyody, when asking, e.g., Effect() to compute the effects of a fitted, e.g., linear model after having deleted the data frame from the workspace for which the model was obtained an error is reported: > myair <- airquality > fm <- lm(Ozone ~ Temp, data = myair) > rm(myair) > Effect("Temp", fm) Error in eval(model$call$data, envir) : object 'myair'

Dear all, I work with R Version 2.0.0 on Machine hardware: sun4u OS version: 5.9 Processor type: sparc Hardware: SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000 and I have a very simple data frame (called OR) with the following variables: > sapply( OR, class) X ci FTyp "factor" "numeric" "factor" (In OR$ci there are some Inf-values. OR's

I owe you a gala dinner at your favorite restaurant. Really. A few questions: Why did you 'git pull --rebase' when the branch was up-to-date? Is this just a safety habit? I don't understand the pushing upstream. Since we use Phabricator, isn't that the job of the person who commits the patch? Does git keep all my branches up-to-date with the origin? Say I come in tomorrow and

Hello, R-help, does anybody have already a work-around for the problem that the formula version of sunflowerplot() throws an error when provided with a value for xlab (or ylab) different from NULL: > sunflowerplot( Sepal.Length ~ Sepal.Width, data = iris, xlab = "A") Error in model.frame.default(formula = Sepal.Length ~ Sepal.Width, data = iris, : variable lengths differ