similar to: IAX2 getting stuck

On 4/19/17 4:09 PM, Antony Stone wrote: > On Wednesday 19 April 2017 at 22:54:51, Carlos Chavez wrote: > >> I have a server that had been operating for a few years now with >> IAX2 trunks to several other servers. Since yesterday all IAX2 trunks >> now say UNREACHABLE. > ...snip... > >> So far the only thing different is that the receive queue for port

If SIP goes to the same provider then yes. Still I would check a packet capture for better understanding. BTW, did you try iax debug? ??, 20 ???. 2017 ?. ? 19:46, Carlos Chavez <cursor at telecomab.mx>: > On 4/20/17 12:45 AM, Kseniya Blashchuk wrote: > > Can it happen that the routes lead the traffic through another interface? > Did you try a packet capture with tcpdump? Do the

On 4/19/17 4:23 PM, Antony Stone wrote: > On Wednesday 19 April 2017 at 23:14:46, Carlos Chavez wrote: > >> On 4/19/17 4:09 PM, Antony Stone wrote: >>> On Wednesday 19 April 2017 at 22:54:51, Carlos Chavez wrote: >>>> I have a server that had been operating for a few years now with >>>> >>>> IAX2 trunks to several other servers.

Can it happen that the routes lead the traffic through another interface? Did you try a packet capture with tcpdump? Do the packets really leave the usb adapter? Can asymmetric routing be in effect? Maybe there were some static routes that disappeared when the adapter was unplugged... On Thu, Apr 20, 2017, 12:41 AM Antony Stone < Antony.Stone at asterisk.open.source.it> wrote: > On

On 2/22/18 3:46 PM, Antony Stone wrote: > On Thursday 22 February 2018 at 21:41:41, Carlos Chavez wrote: > >> On 2/22/18 1:07 PM, Antony Stone wrote: >>> On Thursday 22 February 2018 at 19:10:51, Carlos Chavez wrote: >>>> Usually phone companies set the outgoing CallerID for you but >>>> >>>> recently we got control over that and are

On 2/22/18 1:07 PM, Antony Stone wrote: > On Thursday 22 February 2018 at 19:10:51, Carlos Chavez wrote: > >> Usually phone companies set the outgoing CallerID for you but >> recently we got control over that and are now setting the outgoing >> Calleir ID ourselves. My problem now is that the CDR will put the >> outgoing CID in the CDR instead of the extension

??? Usually phone companies set the outgoing CallerID for you but recently we got control over that and are now setting the outgoing Calleir ID ourselves.? My problem now is that the CDR will put the outgoing CID in the CDR instead of the extension that dialed and that causes problems for reports.? What is the proper way to set outgoing CID and keeping the original extension number in the

On 7/19/17 2:37 AM, Marcelo Terres wrote: > This is the pjsip library. > > Is it possible to you to update pjsip for the latest version to test > if it solves the problem? > > On 18 Jul 2017 3:52 pm, "Carlos Chavez" <cursor at telecomab.mx > <mailto:cursor at telecomab.mx>> wrote: > > I am getting frequent segfaults on a new Asterisk

I am getting frequent segfaults on a new Asterisk installation. So far the only message I see is: Jul 18 09:02:42 pbxbogota kernel: asterisk[26799]: segfault at 188 ip 00007fb2d535723f sp 00007fb25a11b5c0 error 4 in libasteriskpj.so.2[7fb2d52e5000+180000] Jul 18 09:17:00 pbxbogota kernel: asterisk[27453]: segfault at 188 ip 00007f4afea0c23f sp 00007f4a7f7e35c0 error 4 in

I want to try using google for speech recognition in Asterisk and I found a ready made AGI: http://zaf.github.io/asterisk-speech-recog/ I have followed all the steps listed in the web site but I keep getting this error: <PJSIP/2001-0000006e>AGI Tx >> 200 result=99981 (timeout) endpos=22720 <PJSIP/2001-0000006e>AGI Rx << VERBOSE "Unable to get recognition

    Some users have complained that their calls drop after about 30 seconds.  Not all, just some.  After looking at the log files the only difference I can find from the dropped calls is the following line: [2020-09-07 11:29:59] VERBOSE[21666][C-00000055] bridge.c: Bridge 14410400-5e04-4358-af0c-45fd71f6f5cd: switching from simple_bridge technology to native_rtp     Most calls just do:

On 7/20/17 8:47 AM, Marcelo Terres wrote: > Which version of Asterisk are you using? Are you compiling it with the > bundle pjproject ? > > --with-pjproject-bundled > > Regards, > > Marcelo H. Terres <mhterres at gmail.com <mailto:mhterres at gmail.com>> > IM: mhterres at jabber.mundoopensource.com.br > <mailto:mhterres at

I am having a very tough time trying to replace an Elastix 2.X install running as a virtual machine on ESXI 4. I tried using the Freepbx 14 ISO that installs CentOS 6 along with Asterisk 13.16 but I keep getting random segfaults: [175711.476685] asterisk[2942]: segfault at 188 ip 00007fc6c41abffc sp 00007fc608575890 error 4 in libasteriskpj.so.2[7fc6c4144000+14c000] I then proceeded

On 1/8/18 9:38 AM, Bertrand LUPART - Linkeo.com wrote: > Hello Carlos, > > >> We have a server that records all calls so we set Mixmonitor with the b option to only record calls that are actually bridged. I notice that we have lost of 44 byte files in /var/spool/asterisk/monitor which correspond to calls that were not answered. If a call is not answered I assume it was never

    Since yesterday I have a stuck channel on my Asterisk server and I do not know how to eliminate it: Message/ast_msg_queu macro-dial-one       s                  59 Up      Dial         PJSIP/1218/sip:1218 at 192.1 17:24:07     I assume this is something created by Freepbx.  If I do a "channel request hangup" it tells me the channel does not exist. Any ideas? --

I have tried both by hand and hitting tab to auto complete: *CLI> channel request hangup Message/ast_msg_queue Message/ast_msg_queue is not a known channel On 31/10/19 14:18, Sean Bright wrote: > On 10/31/2019 2:13 PM, Carlos Chavez wrote: >> I assume this is something created by Freepbx.  If I do a "channel >> request hangup" it tells me the channel does not exist.

On 11/14/17 3:55 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017, at 05:47 PM, Carlos Chavez wrote: >> I followed the blog post and I can get video from the conference if >> I configure the bridge as follow_talker so I know everything is working >> on the pjsip side. The only problem is that video_mode = sfu is >> apparently not valid in either confbridge.conf or

??? I am having a really bad day trying to get incoming calls to work on Asterisk 13 with PJSIP.? We just migrated from Asterisk 1.8 where everything was working but there seems that something got lost in translation.? No matter what I try I always get a 401 Unauthorized message when receiving a call from the PSTN provider.? I can make calls and the registration is working.? I have tried to

Trace with 3 clients. We can hear each other but no video. https://pbxoficina.telecomabmex.com/nextcloud/index.php/s/X0PQ5FrYeqCwwkz On 11/14/17 5:06 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017, at 07:03 PM, Carlos Chavez wrote: >> On 11/14/17 4:27 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017, at 06:25 PM, Carlos Chavez wrote: >>>> On 11/14/17 3:55

On 11/14/17 4:27 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017, at 06:25 PM, Carlos Chavez wrote: >> On 11/14/17 3:55 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017, at 05:47 PM, Carlos Chavez wrote: >>>> I followed the blog post and I can get video from the conference if >>>> I configure the bridge as follow_talker so I know everything