similar to: Can't install gmime22

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 800 matches similar to: "Can't install gmime22"

2015 May 27
0
CEBA-2015:1033 CentOS 6 glibc BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1033 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1033.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: a193dd5a810304800b3c6c8c6ebe9cf7c812405c2c90c91a8d5e2f55c2808259 glibc-2.12-1.149.el6_6.9.i686.rpm
2015 May 28
0
CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 123, Issue 10
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When
2015 Jan 12
0
Re: Resizing lvm fails with fedora20
On 11.01.2015 02:57, Alex Regan wrote: > Hi, > I'm trying to resize a 15GB LVM root partition on a fedora20 server with > a fedora20 guest and I'm having a problem. Is this supported on fedora20? > > I recall having a similar problem (maybe even exact same problem) all > the way back in fedora16 or fedora17, but hoped/thought it would be > fixed by now? > > #
2015 Jan 11
2
Resizing lvm fails with fedora20
Hi, I'm trying to resize a 15GB LVM root partition on a fedora20 server with a fedora20 guest and I'm having a problem. Is this supported on fedora20? I recall having a similar problem (maybe even exact same problem) all the way back in fedora16 or fedora17, but hoped/thought it would be fixed by now? # virt-df -h test1-011015.img Filesystem Size Used
2017 Jul 17
0
Messages during update 'yum update' at CentOS 6 VM
Walter H. wrote: > > at the last update (Kernel updated > from 2.6.32-696.3.2.el6.x86_64 to 2.6.32-696.6.3.el6.x86_64) > I got these messages > > Updating : ipv6calc-1.0.0-20.el6.x86_64 6/25 > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yi7R81: line 1: /usr/sbin/ldconfig: No such file or > directory > warning: %post(ipv6calc-1.0.0-20.el6.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status > 127 >
2017 Jul 17
2
Messages during update 'yum update' at CentOS 6 VM
Hello, at the last update (Kernel updated from 2.6.32-696.3.2.el6.x86_64 to 2.6.32-696.6.3.el6.x86_64) I got these messages Updating : ipv6calc-1.0.0-20.el6.x86_64 6/25 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.yi7R81: line 1: /usr/sbin/ldconfig: No such file or directory warning: %post(ipv6calc-1.0.0-20.el6.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 127 Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package
2009 Apr 25
3
Bug in sernet RPM's postun?
Hi, I was just wondering whether this possible bug with the Sernet Samba3 RPMs for CentOS 5 is known, since it has not yet been fixed. When uninstalling the Sernet RPMs for Samba3 (in this case Samba 3.2.x) the %postun scriptlet fails every time with: # rpm -e samba3-3.2.0-36 /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.56356: line 2: fg: no job control error: %postun(samba3-3.2.0-36.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status
2020 Jan 22
0
yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair
I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover from this would be greatly appreciated The log below shows: [root at vps2 ~]# yum history info 22 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks Repository mariadb is listed more than once in
2020 Jan 23
0
yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair
> On 1/22/20 3:57 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote: >> I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns >> out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the >> middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover >> from this would be greatly appreciated >> >> The log below shows: >> >> [root at
2020 Jan 23
2
yum update / kernal update failed - remove or repair
On 1/22/20 3:57 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote: > I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover from this would be greatly appreciated > > The log below shows: > > [root at vps2 ~]# yum history info 22 > Loaded plugins:
2011 Nov 05
1
[YUM] - Issue on package removal order on CentOS 5
Hello, I post here because I have an embarassing issue considering the yum version provided with CentOS 5. I am trying to package an application for CentOS. So I wrote my own specfile which is composed of declaration of various packages (main application and plugins for this applications). In that the configuration, the plugins RPM depends on the main application RPM because. Moreover, in
2008 Dec 12
3
Error on Samba 3.2.6 installation
When I installed Samba 3.2.6 from Sernet, I got the following error: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.54116: line 2: fg: no job control error: %postun(samba3-3.0.32-36.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 The error happens when installing the samba and winbind RPMs. I got the same error when installing the previous version 3.2.5 and perhaps 3.2.4. The "rpm-tmp.number" was different in those cases,
2005 Jan 24
1
Error when updating centos-3.3 to 3.4
The following error appeared and I'm wondering if it's important enough to file a bug report: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8817: line 2: gdk-pixbuf-query-loaders: command not found error: %postun(librsvg2-2.2.3-2) scriptlet failed, exit status 127 Also /etc/sysconfig/rhn/rhn-applet.rpmnew got created; the difference is that the uuid has changed from a hex key to "UNSPECIFIED". I
2001 Mar 28
1
PATCH: buglet in vorbis-tools.spec
The attached typo results in error on uninstall of vorbis-tools: error: execution of %postun scriptlet from vorbis-tools-1.0beta4-1 failed, exit status 2 cheers/d -- nuclear cia fbi spy password code president bomb 8D97 F297 CA0D 8751 D8EB 12B6 6EA6 727F 9B8D EC2A <HR NOSHADE> <UL> <LI>text/plain attachment: vorbis-tools.spec.diff </UL> -------------- next part
2016 Oct 07
1
porting spec files
On 10/07/2016 01:44 AM, Ned Slider wrote: > On 06/10/16 22:50, Alice Wonder wrote: >> An rpm intended for a bleeding edge Fedora builds perfectly for me when >> I comment two macros apparently not in CentOS 7 - >> >> %transfiletriggerin >> >> and >> >> %transfiletriggerun >> >> Looks like they operate similar to %post and %postun but
2015 Mar 06
0
Windows XP sees fedora14/samba3 shares but not fedora20/samba4 shares
On 06/03/15 20:30, Al Schapira wrote: > Marc, et al, > > Thanks for your reply. Sorry, I didn't mean to be confusing. > > Summary of problem: > 1) XP sees samba shares on fedora14/samba3 machine, but not on > fedora20/samba4 machines. > 2) all fedora machines see all shares including on XP machine. > 3) clicking on f20 machine from XP tries to log in rather
2005 Apr 06
0
problem: librsvg2
[root at camamu root]# uname -a Linux camamu 2.4.21-27.0.2.EL #1 Wed Jan 19 02:20:34 GMT 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root at camamu root]# apt-get dist-upgrade Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these. The following packages have unmet dependencies: gtk2: Conflicts: librsvg2 (< 2.2.3-3) but 2.2.3-2 is
2013 Apr 24
1
dnsmasq does not start
Hi! I am trying to run tap networking with libvirtd. My test system is Fedora18/ppc64, libvirt 1.0.4 (compiled from git and installed). On another system with Fedora17/ppc64 with the same settings, dnsmasq is running. All configs in /etc/libvirt/ are default and not changed, the only exception is /etc/libvirt/qemu/networks/default.xml which I copied from Fedora17/ppc64 setup. What does
2014 Feb 27
0
Re: [libvirt] LXC, user namespaces and systemd
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Dariusz Michaluk <d.michaluk@samsung.com> wrote: > On 26.02.2014 17:59, Stephan Sachse wrote: >>> >>> # chown -R foo:foo /var/lib/libvirt/filesystems/mycontainer >> >> you must "shift" the uids for the container 0 -> 666, 1 -> 667, 2 -> >> 668. there is a tool for this: uidmapshift > > I
2015 May 28
1
Openssl C6 distro tag different from upstream
Hello, On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 14:25 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 04/02/2015 11:45 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > Just noticed that the distro tag used in openssl is different from > > upstream. Upstream and the last update (openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7) use > > "el6_6" where as the latest update (openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6.8) uses > > "el_6". Any