similar to: [Bug 2585] Several syslog messages have too high priority

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2585 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Blocks|

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2585 Bug 2585 depends on bug 2249, which changed state. Bug 2249 Summary: sshd ignores PAM_MAXRETRIES pam return value https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2249 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2585 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |CLOSED --- Comment #6 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Close all resolved bugs after 7.3p1 release

Ben, Thanks for the tip! I've added the patch to Bug 2705 on bugzilla. Cheers, Ethan On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Ben Lindstrom <mouring at offwriting.org> wrote: > > The mailinglist strips out attachments. So either you need to add it to > the bug or post it in-line to the email. > > Ben > > Ethan Rahn wrote: > > Darren, > > Thanks, evidently I

Darren, Thanks, evidently I need to practice my reading skills. I did some practice on the style guide, and I believe that I have the patch fixed up per the style guidelines. I've attached the new patch to this email for review. Cheers, Ethan On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Ethan Rahn <ethan.rahn at

To revive this thread - I filed a bug in bugzilla.mindrot.org ( Bug 2705 - https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2705 ). I have a patch attached to the email that implements this as well. I wasn't able to find a list of coding standards or contribution guidelines for OpenSSH, so please correct me if I'm wrong. I'd also like to thank Jakuje for helping me out with some info on

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1311 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dtucker at zip.com.au Blocks|

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1311 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Darren Tucker <dtucker

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1716 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dtucker at zip.com.au

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Ethan Rahn <ethan.rahn at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I wanted to check back in. It doesn't look like anyone has commented on the > patch. Is there someone I should prod to get this looked at? > Sorry, it came in just as we were prepping for the 7.5 release and we generally only take bug fixes at that point. I've added it to the

That doesn't seem to be the case. See https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-57pt1r4.pdf (5.6.1 Comparable Algorithm Strengths) On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 8:28 AM Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 16:00, Yegor Ievlev <koops1997 at gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't think there is any point to generate so

On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 at 03:36, Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx at redfish-solutions.com> wrote: > > On Apr 10, 2023, at 7:24 AM, Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> wrote: [...] > > Since you're using 9.1, the message could be an "Invalid free", since > > there was a double-free bug in that release :-( > > Forgot to ask: does this bug manifest

The following patch appears to fix the BUS error received on Solaris 8. This problem manifests as an immediate disconnect with no apparent cause immediately after authentication with the host. --- Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> wrote: > Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:35:26 +1000 > From: Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> > Subject: Re: Bus Error with OpenSSH 3.7.1p2 on

Darren, I went to install zlib/openssl and openssh on one of my Sun Servers(Solaris 2.7) and they would not install. Is there a website where I can get Sun versions of these products? Thanks, Lou -----Original Message----- From: Darren Tucker [mailto:dtucker at zip.com.au] Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2003 9:35 PM To: Pacelli, Louis M, ALABS Cc: OpenSSH Devel List Subject: Re: zlib missing when

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1602 Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtucker at dtucker.net --- Comment #9 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> --- (In reply to Marc

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1654 Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtucker at dtucker.net --- Comment #5 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> --- Created attachment

I don't think there is any point to generate so many moduli. Actually, 3 moduli of sizes 2048, 3072 and 4096 seem like a sane choice. On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 7:58 AM Darren Tucker <dtucker at dtucker.net> wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 14:22, Yegor Ievlev <koops1997 at gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm not nearly knowledgeable enough in crypto to fully understand your

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=859 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtucker at zip.com.au Blocks| |1452 --- Comment #4 from Darren Tucker

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430 Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtucker at zip.com.au Blocks| |1626 Status|NEW

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:52 AM, Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> wrote: [...] >> Seems can't. But why? 7.2 does. > > Dunno, I can't think of any obvious changes to compiler flags. Maybe > try it without setting CFLAGS? OK, I think I see why it started in 7.3: it was when the wide character support was added. In configure.ac: dnl Wide character support. Linux