similar to: [Bug 2537] New: add --version argument

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2536 Bug ID: 2536 Summary: X11 forwarding slows down client Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

Howdy, I'm attempting to compile openssh-7.1p1 using libressl-2.2.4 for the ssl implementation. Unfortunately, this fails to work (tested on Debian Unstable and Gentoo): cd libressl-2.2.4 ./configure --prefix=/opt/libressl-2.2.4 && make -j8 && sudo make install cd ../openssh-7.1p1 ./configure --with-ssl-dir=/opt/libressl-2.2.4 fails with: checking OpenSSL header version...

Hi, I am using Dovecot LDA as LMTP renders envelope extension unusable. The problem I have noticed is that when user has multiple aliases sieve responds to all of them, not only to :addresses specified. >From testing it seems that :addresses only adds addresses to the list of "known" emails to check against. It is not limiting it. As I understand, sieve should check if To: header

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Austin English <austinenglish at gmail.com> wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> I'm attempting to compile openssh-7.1p1 using libressl-2.2.4 for the >> ssl implementation. Unfortunately, this fails to work (tested on >> Debian Unstable and Gentoo):

You could have negative indices. There are two ways to do this. 1) provide a large offset. Offset <- 30 for (i in -29 to 120) { print(df[i+Offset])} 2) use absolute values if all indices are negative. for (i in -200 to -1) {print(df[abs(i)])} Tim -----Original Message----- From: R-help <r-help-bounces at r-project.org> On Behalf Of Peter Dalgaard via R-help Sent: Monday, April 22,

On 2018-03-03 21:28, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 3/2/2018 om 3:35 PM schreef Karol Augustin: >> Hi, >> >> I am using Dovecot LDA as LMTP renders envelope extension unusable. >> >> The problem I have noticed is that when user has multiple aliases sieve >> responds to all of them, not only to :addresses specified. >> >> From testing it seems that

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2479 Bug ID: 2479 Summary: ssh-keyscan non-standard port broken Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.9p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh-keyscan Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

Doesn't sound like you got the point. x[-1] normally removes the first element. With 0-based indices, this cannot work. - pd > On 22 Apr 2024, at 17:31 , Ebert,Timothy Aaron <tebert at ufl.edu> wrote: > > You could have negative indices. There are two ways to do this. > 1) provide a large offset. > Offset <- 30 > for (i in -29 to 120) { print(df[i+Offset])} >

Heh. Did anyone bring up negative indices yet? -pd > On 22 Apr 2024, at 10:46 , Rolf Turner <rolfturner at posteo.net> wrote: > > > See fortunes::fortune(36). > > cheers, > > Rolf Turner > > -- > Honorary Research Fellow > Department of Statistics > University of Auckland > Stats. Dep't. (secretaries) phone: > +64-9-373-7599

It's not hidden like an hidden file or system file (things you can display tweaking some explorer options), it's not visible at all. I think there is no way to list them, it's not hidden, it's unlisted, but you still can access them if you know the full path. 2016-06-28 13:10 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>: > > > Am 28.06.2016 um 09:53 schrieb

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102106 Bug ID: 102106 Summary: xorg crashes when running gscan2pdf (libgtk2-perl) test case Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2465 Bug ID: 2465 Summary: openssh portable does not check if arc4random_buf is declared in the system headers? Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

On 28.04.2016 11:16, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 28.04.2016 um 11:00 schrieb tell at posteo.de: >> i'm trying to figure out some specific things about Samba DFS. >> >> 1. What is the ordering method of a DFS Share with multiple servers >> (e.g. msdfs:serverB\\share,serverC\\share linkb ; Source: >>

> On 29. Sep 2018, at 23:58, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > > Save yourself the effort, time, headaches and eventual bloody tears of impotent > rage and just go with Google or some other provider. Running a mail > server properly is one of the more difficult tasks and quite often not > worth the time and trouble, especially if one is asking about it on a

Hello list, Dovecot Version: 2.2.34 (874deae) on FreeBSD MTA: Postfix 3.3.0 I've got an issue with the quota-status service: Something breaks when receiving mail with a recipient address that includes non-lowercase characters, for example foo at Example.com instead of foo at example.com: postfix log: postfix/smtp/smtpd[83387]: NOQUEUE: reject_warning: RCPT from

Hello Peter, Unless I too misunderstand your point, negative indices for removal do work with the Oarray package (though -0 doesn't work to remove the 0th element, since -0 == 0 -- perhaps what you meant): > library(Oarray) > v <- Oarray(1:10, offset=0) > v [0,] [1,] [2,] [3,] [4,] [5,] [6,] [7,] [8,] [9,] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > dim(v)

No. I fixed that, the NAMESPACE file now contains: S3method("[[<-", mylist) S3method("$<-", mylist) It still does not work. I also created a print method (print.mylist) which did work out of the box, regardless of being in the NAMESPACE file or not. Could it be somehow in here (also in my NAMESPACE file): exportPattern("^[[:alpha:]]+") Or could it be that

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:40:54AM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Colin Watson wrote on Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 10:51:46PM +0100: > > Is it actually a requirement that an API compatibility layer be > > maintained by the OpenSSL team, or could a hypothetical group of > > external developers interested in breaking this stalemate fork > > openssl-compat.tar.gz, stick it in a

Hi, more or less a year ago Kurt Roeckx provided an initial port towards the OpenSSL 1.1 API [0]. The patch has been left untouched [1] and it has been complained about a missing compat layer of the new vs the old API within the OpenSSL library [2]. This is how I reconstructed the situation as of today and I am not aware of any progress in regard to the newer library within the OpenSSH project.

Hi Rolf, No it is not. I don't know to which question did you want to respond ? I desribed everything in my first email and attached links from SO with pictures included, which are quite understandable. Cheers, Jacek wt., 27 lut 2024 o 02:29 Rolf Turner <rolfturner at posteo.net> napisa?(a): > > I have no real idea what you are trying to do, but if a table is > what you