similar to: [Bug 86] Port should not depend on ListenAddress

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> --- taking the 2nd paragraph back... I forgot that one can give the port to ListenAddress ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1843 Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |calestyo at scientia.net --- Comment #6 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=958 Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |calestyo at scientia.net --- Comment #3 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1953 Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |calestyo at scientia.net --- Comment #2 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1993 Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|6.2p1 |6.7p1 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> --- Hi guys.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1994 Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #2637| |ok- Flags| | --- Comment #2 from Christoph Anton Mitterer

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2000 Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|INVALID |--- Status|CLOSED |REOPENED --- Comment #6 from Christoph Anton

Damien, What is the best document to use for documentation on SFTP? In other words, if I want to build an SFTP client library based on libssh.a, is there documentation about the series of messages I need to send over the wire? Thanks, ScottN -----Original Message----- From: openssh-unix-dev [mailto:openssh-unix-dev-bounces+scott_n=xypro.com at mindrot.org] On Behalf Of Damien Miller Sent:

There were a few notes in this thread that may indicate open areas for development. I forward merely as FYI. http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2015-January/024231.html ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001 at cs.auckland.ac.nz> Date: Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:29 PM Subject: Re: [Cryptography] Why aren?t we using SSH for everything? To: calestyo at

Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net> wrote: > >> There is one thing I forgot to ask last time.... when using that cue >> feature from flag,.. is it possible to store different tags (title, >> composer, etc) for each range? And if so how do I specify this on the >> command line? >> > unfortunately, no. >

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1988 --- Comment #15 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> --- Seems to also cause quite some troubles in the use case I've described in bug #2000, which Damien just marked a dup of this one. So people may want to have a look there as well for possibly further information. Can anyone make some predictions whether this

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2287 Bug ID: 2287 Summary: AuthorizedKeysCommandUser should have it's default documented Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.2p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component:

My two-cents removing v1 from the server - excellent. removing it from the client - admirable, but there are many potential operational concerns as mentioned above. I'll chat a bit about personal experience with removal of something as being "more secure" when it's effect is actually lessen "security" Possible solution - even for beyond ? Create a new client that

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1993 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> --- (replies to all your comments in one) Hey. Sorry for the delay. (In reply to Darren Tucker from comment #5) > > $ ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no someHost > > Warning: Permanently added the ECDSA host key for IP address > >

Well, with stored music files, with close to transparency bitrate, you don't really need Opus. Now compare it with Vorbis when streaming on a low bandwidth connection with real-time latency... 2015-10-25 2:01 GMT-02:00 Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net>: > Hey. > > I just wondered,... which is the recommended bitrate and further > settings of opusenc (like

Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> wrote: > So basically, with 100 kB/s or say 128 kB/s one should be more or less > safe and very close to transparency, right?! Yes, assuming you mean kb/s (kilobits, not kilobytes, per second), and no more than 2 channels (stereo). > > Are there any bitrates recommended (e.g. for quality or performance > reasons)? E.g. that

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1953 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> --- Does anyone know whether anything is going on with SFTP (especially also with repsect to ACLs and XATTRs)? More than a year ago we saw this http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moonesamy-secsh-filexfer-00 which apparently tried to restart the draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1994 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> --- Created attachment 2637 --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2637&action=edit ssh -vvv output what happens when a key is auto added for the IP address of an already trusted host -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1993 --- Comment #10 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> --- Created attachment 2638 --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2638&action=edit ssh -vvv output what happens when a key is auto added for the IP address of an already trusted host -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2000 --- Comment #8 from Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo at scientia.net> --- Uhm? Well I thought that was obvious... using SSH to remotely execute checks seems desirable because it's a) the protocol meant for doing this b) secure (unlike e.g. NRPE). But without control channel muxing, it's much slower than e.g. NRPE, as all the