similar to: [Bug 2464] New: Adding timestamp to debug messages (log.c:do_log)

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2464 --- Comment #3 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> --- Created attachment 2741 --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2741&action=edit Changes as suggested. Diff updated with suggested changes (also, making the timestamp format ISO8601 compliant). That said, what's the use case for this? The timestamps are

Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> writes: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Mark D. Baushke <mdb at juniper.net> wrote: > > Diff updated with suggested changes (also, making the timestamp format > > ISO8601 compliant). > > > > Hmmm... full IOS8601 compliance would include the timzeone so the format > > I don't have a copy of the ISO8601

Hello, My name is Nader Al Awar, and I am a master's student at UT Austin. I’m interested in working on the "Improve parallelism-aware analyses and optimizations" project as part of GSoC. I looked at the relevant talks papers and I believe that I would be a good fit. Most of my background is in software engineering and testing, but recently my research has focused on applying HPC

I have tried to install the RODBC package with the next command: > install.packages(("ORDBC"), (lib="usr/lib/R/library")) But it is failed. Can I get some information about the installation of this package anywhere? Best regards, Nader -------------------------------------------------------------- Zie ook/see also: http://www.knmi.nl/maildisclaimer.html

Hi to Both, Praveen, I think you didn't CC Johannes. :) I'll give it a try. Best, Stefanos Στις Τρί, 24 Μαρ 2020 στις 9:44 μ.μ., ο/η Praveen Velliengiri via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> έγραψε: > Hi Nader, > I have cc'ed the project mentor. He is the best person to help you here. > All the best. > > On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 at 20:42, Nader Al Awar via

Hi Jean-Marc, We needed to use a release version of the SDK because this part of production code for our Sony implementations. I'm not sure how stable that branch is. Is the encoding and decoding already stable? In other words, what is not stable about that branch? Thanks, --------------------------- Saad Nader Middleware Engineer Powered By Gamespy, IGN -----Original Message----- From:

Hi, I have a Centos5 machine running xen 3.0.3-41 with two NICs each on its own subnet: 192.168.1.x and 192.168.0.x. All DomUs can talk to each other OK through two xen bridges. There are 3 DomUs: Dom0, Dom1 and Dom2 The scenario: I''m trying to capture packets on Dom2 on 192.168.0.x from external devices that are sending SIP stuff to Dom1, but fail to capture any packets. I

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2459 Bug ID: 2459 Summary: ssh-keygen -t rsa1 should be removed from Makefile Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: Build system Assignee:

Hi, I've ran my static checker Calysto on openssh and found the following bug: Possible NULL-ptr deref (vc536): @/work/benchmarks/SOURCES/openssh-4.6p1/moduli.c:173 + ptr gtm returned from gmtime dereferenced without checking (gmtime can return NULL). There are probably more possible NULL-ptr dereferences, but Calysto currently does not check the usage of library functions (for instance, if

I''m trying to add an RSS feed to my app, and am going through the Rails Recipes chapter on doing so. I get the following error when I request the feed: undefined method `gmtime'' for #<DateTime: 1963061961/800,0,2299161> ... 7: xml.pubDate CGI.rfc1123_date(@posts.first.created_on) Any idea what''s up? Pat

Signed-off-by: krishnaiah bommu <krishnaiah.bommu at intel.com> --- moduli.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/moduli.c b/moduli.c index 578fc48..c1fa484 100644 --- a/moduli.c +++ b/moduli.c @@ -153,12 +153,14 @@ static int qfileout(FILE * ofile, u_int32_t otype, u_int32_t otests, u_int32_t otries, u_int32_t osize, u_int32_t ogenerator, BIGNUM *

Hi there! I have some data in POSIXlt format: 2009-07-18 5:53:00 2008-11-23 7:27:00 2008-11-24 5:25:00 and would like to extract information about only the minutes of the day, like: 5:53 --> 353 minutes 7:27 --> 447 minutes can you help me? Carlos Nader [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

t_strftime and variants now .......................................... : ok test-time-util.c:123: Assert failed: strcmp(t_strftime(RFC2822_FMT, gmtime(&ts)), exp) == 0 test-time-util.c:124: Assert failed: strcmp(t_strfgmtime(RFC2822_FMT, ts), exp) == 0 t_strftime and variants fixed timestamp .............................. : FAILED timings 0

Hello, It is very simple question. I want to go to the parent directory and give the 'system("cd ../") commnad. But it stayes at the same dirctory as before. Do I forget to give some extra parameter to system command in this case? Regards, Nader -------------------------------------------------------------- Zie ook/see also: http://www.knmi.nl/maildisclaimer.html

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: speex-1.0.5.zip Type: application/x-zip-compressed Size: 641376 bytes Desc: speex-1.0.5.zip Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20071022/2447cf50/speex-1.0.5-0001.bin

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3350 Bug ID: 3350 Summary: Network errors aren't printed logged Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: ssh Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

Hi Jean-Marc, Jim, Saad has been keeping me in the loop on your recent discussions. Since all of our testing has been against 1.0.5, based on that being the last non-beta version, that's the particular scope of the task that Saad is working on right now. I like what I'm reading about as far as encoder/decoder quality improvements e.g. in the 1.2 betas, and am going to push for

The time stamps in ASTCC are useless as they are now: Fri Jul 22 15:06:25 2005 Wouldn't it be better to use something like: 2005-07-22 15:06:24 Fri I want to sort the records by date, but with the format now it is impossible... or do I miss something? bye Ronald Wiplinger

In another thread recursive snapshot creation was found atomic so that it is done quickly, and more important, all at once or nothing at all. Do you know if recursive destroying and renaming of snapshots are atomic too? Regards Henrik Heino

Hi all, I compiled a 64-bit Dovecot stable (13-03-2005) version on a Solaris 9 box with gcc 3.4.2. OpenSSL and libiconv are compiled 64-bit also. The configure I use: export CPPFLAGS="-m64 -I/var/tmp/openssl/include" export LDFLAGS="-m64 -L/var/tmp/openssl/lib" ./configure \ --prefix=/opt/dovecot \ --sysconfdir=/etc/opt/dovecot