similar to: sshd 7.4p1 with ssl 1.0.2j seg faults, MacOSX 10.12.2/3, clang-800.0.42.1

On 13 August 2018 at 15:06, Val Baranov <val.baranov at duke.edu> wrote: [...] > test_utf8: ........................ > regress/unittests/utf8/tests.c:48 test #25 "c_esc" > ASSERT_INT_EQ(len, wantlen) failed: > len = -1 > wantlen = 5 This boils down to meaning OpenSSH's smnprintf call failed for the string "\033x" instead of returning the

On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:16:34PM CDT, Damien Miller wrote: >Hi, > >OpenSSH 7.8p1 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing >on as many platforms and systems as possible. This is a bugfix release. AIX 7.1 TL5, C compiler 11.1.0.23 - error in "test_utf8": test_sshbuf:

On 17/08/2018 17:15, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > Hi Darren, > > Darren Tucker wrote on Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 07:16:03AM -0700: >> On 13 August 2018 at 15:06, Val Baranov <val.baranov at duke.edu> wrote: >>> test_utf8: ........................ >>> regress/unittests/utf8/tests.c:48 test #25 "c_esc" >>> ASSERT_INT_EQ(len, wantlen) failed:

On 27/03/17 17:06, Tom G. Christensen wrote: > On 20/03/17 14:31, Damien Miller wrote: >> OpenSSH 7.5 has just been released. It will be available from the >> mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/ shortly. >> > > I'm seeing an error in the testsuite on Solaris 2.6: > test_utf8: ........................ > regress/unittests/utf8/tests.c:48 test #25

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 06:22:41PM -0700, The Doctor wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:12:21PM +1100, Damien Miller wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, The Doctor wrote: > > > > > Got you. Will run make tests. So far running on > > > FreeBSD 11.0 using openssl 1.0.2 current > > > > Thanks! > > Point of concern > > run test sftp-perm.sh

OpenSSH 7.5 has just been released. It will be available from the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/ shortly. OpenSSH is a 100% complete SSH protocol 2.0 implementation and includes sftp client and server support. OpenSSH also includes transitional support for the legacy SSH 1.3 and 1.5 protocols that may be enabled at compile-time. Once again, we would like to thank the OpenSSH community

Hi, I've been attempting to use rsync 3.1.2 to copy files from a macOS 10.12.2 system to an AFP mounted share. The command I'm using is: rsync -avAX -M--fake-super ./testDir ./mnt/testDir/ This works fine and all the extended attributes are copied and readable. I then try to use rsync to copy these files back with: rsync -avAX --fake-super -M--super ./mnt/testDir/ ./testDir2/ This

On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 at 09:53, Hisashi T Fujinaka <htodd at twofifty.com> wrote: > OK, NetBSD-current amd64, NetBSD-9-amd64, and NetBSD-9-i386 all pass all > tests. MacOS, well, I always try it but it has problems. What's the problem on OS X? We test on it regularly (El Capitan and High Sierra) and the only problem I'm aware of is that the native libcrypto on High Sierra is

The Asterisk Development Team has announced security releases for Certified Asterisk 1.8.15 and Asterisk 1.8, 10, and 11. The available security releases are released as versions 1.8.15-cert2, 1.8.20.2, 10.12.2, 10.12.2-digiumphones, and 11.2.2. These releases are available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/releases The release of these versions

The Asterisk Development Team has announced security releases for Certified Asterisk 1.8.15 and Asterisk 1.8, 10, and 11. The available security releases are released as versions 1.8.15-cert2, 1.8.20.2, 10.12.2, 10.12.2-digiumphones, and 11.2.2. These releases are available for immediate download at http://downloads.asterisk.org/pub/telephony/asterisk/releases The release of these versions

Assuming you are aware Apple 10.12.1/2 did a number on crypto, broke SSH, HTTPS to "legacy" servers. R/ Everett Batey / Skype: wa6cre-10 / efbatey at gmail.com Please visit So Calif Linux Expo http://www.socallinuxexpo.org On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Steven Kilby <stevenkilby2 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've been attempting to use rsync 3.1.2 to copy

Two identical machines, both running CentOS 4.3 plus all the errata. First one: yum update went for a while and hung. At the bottom of the yum.log file was this: Aug 31 06:58:01 Updated: control-center.i386 1:2.8.0-12.rhel4.5 Aug 31 06:58:09 Updated: iiimf-le-unit.i386 1:12.1-13.EL.5 Aug The python process was in the process list, but it was consuming no CPU time. I let it go for a couple

The current mitigation for CVE-2018-14634 is a systemtap script mentioned here: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2018-14634 It also mentions that one can build a kernel module to distribute to other machines, but in any case one needs the corresponding debuginfo packages to do either. After enabling CentOS-Debug.repo, what I get is:

Good Day. In June, I posted a small query under the Subject of _odd smbpasswd / smbclient error from Linux to Solaris_ Briefly, a Solaris sparc server running 3.0.25a would not accept passwords from the Linux smbclient program if the password was 9 characters or greater. Instead, one would get this: session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE but it worked fine with the Solaris sparc

Hello List, We just migrated from a PPC Xserve to an Intel Xserve. I used "rsync" to bring everyone's home directories over, and in the back of my mind wondered about how it would handle the binary index files... only one way to find out! :) Once I tried to login to IMAP, I got the following results: May 6 19:46:48 posh dovecot[1169]: IMAP(cabel): Rebuilding index file

Hi, OpenSSH 7.9p1 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing on as many platforms and systems as possible. This is a bugfix release. Snapshot releases for portable OpenSSH are available from http://www.mindrot.org/openssh_snap/ The OpenBSD version is available in CVS HEAD: http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html Portable OpenSSH is also available via git using the instructions at

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 9:40 PM, Phil Perry <pperry at elrepo.org> wrote: > Normally elrepo only releases the long term branch for Enterprise Linux, on > the assumption EL users will welcome the implied stability over more > frequent and potentially buggy releases. > In this case I had built the current short lived release as a user requested > it for compatibility with the

On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 03:54:06PM -0600, Zube wrote: > > Le 28/10/2018 ? 22:10, Albert McCann a ?crit?: > > > > Red Hat would stay as a distinct entity inside IBM. IBM has also > > contributed to Free software, and especially Linux kernel. > > I don't know how bad it is and the implications for CentOS... > > That old war wound started aching again. >

Le 28/10/2018 ? 22:10, Albert McCann a ?crit?: > Damn, this is bad enough to make one weep. Red Hat would stay as a distinct entity inside IBM. IBM has also contributed to Free software, and especially Linux kernel. I don't know how bad it is and the implications for CentOS... Alain -- Administrateur Syst?me/R?seau C2N (ex LPN) Centre de Nanosciences et Nanotechnologies (UMR 9001)

On 10/28/18 17:54, Zube wrote: > On Sun Oct 28 10:20:31 PM, Alain p?an wrote: > >> Le 28/10/2018 ? 22:10, Albert McCann a ?crit?: >>> Damn, this is bad enough to make one weep. >> >> Red Hat would stay as a distinct entity inside IBM. IBM has also >> contributed to Free software, and especially Linux kernel. >> I don't know how bad it is and the