similar to: Lowering the metadata attached to an instruction down to Pattern Instruction Selection pass

Hi Serge, Thanks for your help. I have looked at the change log, and so far as I can tell, my implementation is pretty much identical to all of the in-tree targets, but I’m missing something and can’t see what it is. I have simplified my TD description to just: def MyCallseqStart : SDNode<"ISD::CALLSEQ_START", SDCallSeqStart<[SDTCisVT<0, i32>,

Hi Martin, Pseudo CALLSEQ_START was changed in r302527, commit message contains details on the changes. However CALLSEQ_END was not modified. If your made changes to ADJCALLSTACKUP to add additional argument, that may result in error. Thanks, --Serge 2017-09-15 19:09 GMT+07:00 Martin J. O'Riordan via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Hi LLVM-Devs, > > I have managed

Hi LLVM-Devs, I have managed to complete updating our sources from LLVM v4.0 to v5.0, but I am getting selection errors for 'callseq_end'. I am aware that the 'ADJCALLSTACKUP' and 'ADJCALLSTACKDOWN' patterns have changed, and have added an additional argument to the TD descriptions for these. There are interactions with 'ISD::CALL' and 'ISD::RET_FLAG',

I've got a user that wants Japanese language support in firefox... our *stock* CentOS firefox, 24.3. I've yum installed i18, and i10, and no joy. Looked at firefox addons, and there's one, 27.0. Won't install, "not compatible". Neither is either 24.0, or 25.0. Anyone have a link to a compatible version? mark

Hi, I am doing a hierarchical CFA using the sem package. I have 20 items, and I have 2 factors (F3 and F4), and also F1 and F2 are nested within F3. Here is the code that I have, but it is giving me an error message "Warning message: In eval(expr, envir, enclos) : Negative parameter variances. Model may be underidentified." and a further error "Error in summary.objectiveML(cfa,

Hello All, I am trying to understand the demanded-bits pass. The example in the source code (below) seems quite explicit. In the example, only 16 bits from a 32 bit variable in IR are demanded and therefore the variable is truncated to a 16 bit variable. %1 = add i32 %x, %y %2 = trunc i32 %1 to i16 However I was wondering if for example, the addition demanded, say 18 bits, would this pass

Hi all, hope someone can help me out with this. Background Introduction I have a data set consisting of data collected from a questionnaire that I wish to validate. I have chosen to use confirmatory factor analysis to analyse this data set. Instrument The instrument consists of 11 subscales. There is a total of 68 items in the 11 subscales. Each item is scored on an integer scale between 1 to 4.

Hello: When I use SPSS I execute the AGGREGATE DATA comand for the next data: 2112141123212213212213334 3143244113442312121213344 2114141123112214212113344 2112211122212413421213221 3114444123442414343413344 2312231223212222323223322 2143241123212313131213234 2113241113212313222213333 2113141123112214212113344 2114141123412111114413344 2113211122342314222313234 2114141123112414212113344

I'm working through some very basic IR code and got a bit confused by the string printing example. In particular, if you have a constant string like: @.str = private unnamed_addr constant [4 x i8] c"%d\0A\00" To pass this as a pointer to a C-function like printf you need to use 2 indexes in getelementptr: %sp = getelementptr [4 x i8]* @.str, i32 0, i32 0 I think I understand

Hello to you all! I have some nice problems with Fedora3 and Samba: I have some different Redhat-servers running (Redhat 9 with samba 2.x) and Fedora-Servers. Is there a simple way to exermine which charset and codepage is used on the Serverside and how to adjust the client site, so that all special characters are shown correctly? I have rad many newsgroup-postings saying: try and error, but

On Sep 29, 2010, at 8:35 AMPDT, Ralf Karrenberg wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I have stumbled upon a test case (the attached module is a slightly > reduced version) that shows extremely reduced performance on linux > compared to windows when executed using LLVM's JIT. > > We narrowed the problem down to the actual code being generated, the > source IR on both systems

Hello everybody, I have stumbled upon a test case (the attached module is a slightly reduced version) that shows extremely reduced performance on linux compared to windows when executed using LLVM's JIT. We narrowed the problem down to the actual code being generated, the source IR on both systems is the same. Try compiling the attached module: llc -O3 -filetype=asm -o BAD.s BAD.ll Under

I am trying to write a function that will solve a simple system of nonlinear equations for the parameters that describe the beta distribution (a,b) given the mean and variance. mean = a/(a+b) variance = (a*b)/(((a+b)^2) * (a+b+1)) Any help as to where to start would be welcome. -- Scott Story Graduate Student MSU Ecology Department 319 Lewis Hall Bozeman, Mt 59717 406.994.2670 sstory at

I should mention a couple of useful self-explanatory LLVM flags for triage: -enable-misched=false -verify-misched -Andy On Oct 15, 2013, at 4:43 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > Grats on the work, a long time coming! > > Beware the incoming register allocation bugs ;) > > -eric > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Andrew Trick <atrick at

Hello everyone, please I need your help. To reproduce my problem I created simple pass for backends (TestPass.cpp in attached files). That pass I call from Mips backend in this way (MipsTargetMachine.cpp): bool MipsPassConfig::addPreRegAlloc() { addPass(createTestPass()); return false; } The problem becomes, when I am trying compile file ldtoa.ll (in attached files). Compiling