similar to: How to get the function definition of a kmpc_micro call

Thanks Arpith for this pointer but it did not contain what I was looking for. However, I solved my issue by finding that the BitCastInst used when outlining OpenMP parallel region offers a method for retrieving the original value within the bitcast via stripPointerCasts(). So what I did to retrieve omp_outlined..45 is: //bitcast is the third argument of __kmpc_fork_call Value *vcall =

Thanks for your reply. Yes, I was about to recurse over the use list of the argument in the called function. I did not want to pursue that because with this solution, I am going to implement the interprocedural part myself and was wondering if that was not already done. I was not also 100% sure that this will work for any type of arguments. If, based on your response, this is my only solution

Hello, I have been using the USE class to access the use-def chains of different values. However, what I have noticed is that the set of users of a particular value is limited for the appearance of that variable in the current function. How can I get the interprocedural use of a particular value? For example, if a variable *a* is used as an argument in a function call *foo*, the USE analysis

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:05 PM Dounia Khaldi via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > Yes, I was about to recurse over the use list of the argument in the > called function. I did not want to pursue that because with this solution, > I am going to implement the interprocedural part myself and was wondering > if that was not already

Dear community, In preparation for the BoF on Parallel IR at the US developers meeting we would like to collect feedback from the whole community. The concerns, ideas, etc. will be summarized in the BoF and should provide a good starting point for a discussion. We know that over the years the topic of a parallel extension for LLVM was discussed on the mailing list [0, 1, 2], workshops [3, 4] or

Hello, In one of the loop transformations I am developing, I need to convert eq and neq loop latch condition into less than or greater than depending on the control flow. The problem is that CmpInst::ICMP_EQ and CmpInst::ICMP_NE are neither signed nor unsigned in LLVM. Also, I did not find a way to find out if the integer operands of the CmpInst are signed or unsigned. Apparently, LLVM does

At least one proprietary linker put a lot of effort into deduplicating and rewriting debug information. This took up the majority of the link time despite serious engineering time on performance optimisation. For example, some sections were written from scratch by the linker because that proved faster than parsing the input. Teaching LLD to dedup DWARF should be expected to dramatically slow it

Hi Jim, Thanks for the reply. I was able to figure out the problem in 'lli'. InitializeNativeTargetAsmParser() was missing in lli. I should have replied back saying that the problem was resolved. Hope I didn't waste your time. Regards, Amit ________________________________ From: Jim Grosbach [grosbach at apple.com] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 2:07 PM To: Amit Arya Cc: LLVM

I see some code in R to attach finalizers to external pointer references (Register[C]Finalizer). Anyone have an example of how to code the finalizer? R_RegisterCFinalizer accepts a C function, but I can't see how to get it to operate on the pointer, since the pointer is not passed to the function when its called. RegisterFinalizer takes an R closure, but how is it called from R (tried

Hello, I was implementing the llvm_any_type in my intrinsic def int_csa_xxx : Intrinsic<[llvm_any_ty], [llvm_i32_ty]>; as the following in its corresponding builtins in Builtins.def: BUILTIN(__builtin_xxx, "v.", "nt") the "t" was sufficient here to not perform any type checking. The type checking was handled in CGBuiltin.cpp. This was working until

Hi Amit, You're not doing anything wrong. This is an error in 'lli' not properly initializing the native target libraries. Fixed in SVN trunk r167392. -Jim On Nov 4, 2012, at 4:09 PM, Amit Arya <aarya at cs.stonybrook.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > I am first year PhD student at Stony Brook University. For one of my projects I am trying to JIT compile and run a C program

Hi, is there R function that does factor analysis? Thanks in advance. Kenny Ye Assistant Professor Department of Applied Math and Statistics SUNY at Stony Brook Stony Brook, New York 11794-3600 (516)632 9344 -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info",

The latest version of `MCMCvis` is now available on CRAN. `MCMCvis` is an R package used to visualize, manipulate, and summarize MCMC output. MCMC output may be derived from Bayesian model output fit with JAGS, Stan, or other MCMC samplers. Improvements since the last CRAN release (0.8.1) include: * ability to calculate and plot prior posterior overlap * ability to return number of effective

When I use the function cancor of mva package, I found that it doesn't work when one of the matrix has only one column, or both have only one column. The function in Splus 5 with the same name works under those situations. The version of R I am using is 0.63.2 (released on Jan., 1999) on Solaris. Kenny Ye Assistant Professor Department of Applied Math and Statistics SUNY at Stony Brook

I seem to remember something about an "internal" keyword for R doc files. How do we use it? Tim -- Timothy H. Keitt Department of Ecology and Evolution State University of New York at Stony Brook Stony Brook, New York 11794 USA Phone: 631-632-1101, FAX: 631-632-7626 http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/ee/keitt/ -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

Its not clear from the documentation whether one should do \keyword[key1, key2} or \keyword{key1} \keyword{key2} in .Rd files. I believe the latter is correct. (At least 'R CMD check' complains when given the first version.) It would help to make this explicit in the R extension writing docs. Tim -- Timothy H. Keitt Department of Ecology and Evolution State University of New

I'm curious if any of the core R developers have considered the possibility of hosting R (v2?) on the parrot common runtime environment. Perl6 will generate byte-code for parrot, as will some future version of python. I can imagine both drawbacks and advantages. Some advantages would be fast byte-code execution and freely mixing perl, python and R modules. Anyone looked into this? Tim

I have an application where I need to preserve object attributes across calls to 'lapply'. The current definition is: lapply <- function (X, FUN, ...) { FUN <- match.fun(FUN) if (!is.list(X)) X <- as.list(X) rval <- .Internal(lapply(X, FUN)) names(rval) <- names(X) return(rval) } Would it make sense to replace names(rval) <- names(X)

Can a C function wrapped with .Call return void? Or must it return a valid SEXP? Thnx. Tim -- Timothy H. Keitt Department of Ecology and Evolution State University of New York at Stony Brook Stony Brook, New York 11794 USA Phone: 631-632-1101, FAX: 631-632-7626 http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/ee/keitt/ -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing

Is there any plan to compile leaps library for windows? thanks. Kenny Kenny Ye Assistant Professor Department of Applied Math and Statistics SUNY at Stony Brook Stony Brook, New York 11794-3600 Phone (631)632-9344 Fax (631)632-8490 -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send