similar to: The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default.

Yes, I believe it was built against centos 6.7. I wanted to build it against an older release but couldn't quite bootstrap it without newer libstdc++. Sorry, it would be clearer if I'd have made the package name include "centos6.7". On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > wrote: > [root at localhost

So CentOS before 6.7 is not an option after all? Is that possible to use clang on CentOS 6.6 and before? On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I believe it was built against centos 6.7. I wanted to build it > against an older release but couldn't quite bootstrap it without newer > libstdc++. > > Sorry, it would be clearer

Does anyone know of a CentOS 6 compiled version of the widevine DRM plugin? With Firefox 60ESR, Netflix (e.g.) installs a version in your ~/.mozilla/firefox/(profile name)gmp-widevinecdm/ directory but it has the following library failures in 'ldd' output: > ldd libwidevinecdm.so ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.5' not found (required by

On 07/13/2018 08:17 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/13/2018 07:42 AM, Matthew Phelps wrote: >> Does anyone know of a CentOS 6 compiled version of the widevine DRM plugin? >> >> With Firefox 60ESR, Netflix (e.g.) installs a version in your >> ~/.mozilla/firefox/(profile name)gmp-widevinecdm/ directory but it has the >> following library failures in 'ldd'

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net > wrote: > > > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100 > > From: isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> > > > > Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux? > > > > http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html > > > > I can't get it to

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:50 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote: > So CentOS before 6.7 is not an option after all? > Is that possible to use clang on CentOS 6.6 and before? > > Not with these binaries, unless you can update your libc/libstdc++. In the general sense -- yes, it's possible if you build from source. There's a couple of potential

Sorry if I was unclear, I have no problems building clang against a newer gcc for my own purpose. But it doesn't make sense to provide a release binary for clang that's hosted on llvm.org that's ostensibly for "centos6" when it would really be bound to "centos6 plus the SCLO mirror which has the dependency for a newer libstdc++". The glibc 2.14 dependency is a

Hell, Brian, I found a way to install Gcc 5.3 on CentOS 6 without the need to building it from source. You may try it on CentOS 6.0 That's makes clang/llvm won't depends on the newer version of glibc 2.14 The instruction: vim /etc/yum.repos.d/llvm.repo The content: ``` [sclo] name=SCLO baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/sclo/x86_64/rh/ gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 ``` Installation step:

Has anyone tried the new flash player beta for Linux? http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer.html I can't get it to work on CentOS 6.8, ff 45.3.0-1, all x86_64. ff's pluginreg.dat shows the plugin is [INVALID], which is often a sign of bitness-mismatch, but that's not the case here. $ tail -n 3 pluginreg.dat [INVALID] /usr/lib64/flash-plugin/libflashplayer.so:$ 1474541270000:$

It is possible to statically link against libstdc++, yes. I don't quite know all the pieces to the recipe in order to get that to work. It would require changes to the release script in order to get those configuration changes all the way through the third phase build. I don't believe any other tarball release does this, so it would at least be an unconventional release. On Wed, Jun

On 04/22/15 21:05, Mark LaPierre wrote: > Can someone recommend a good video card to use with CentOS 6.6 that has > a GPU, or two, or more, that will work with the Folding At Home project. > > I built a killer machine primarily for contributing to the FAH effort > but the video card, NVIDIA Corporation G94 [GeForce 9600 GT], I had on > hand is not getting any assignments.

Well, is that possible to include libstdc++4.7 into llvm? On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 2:26 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry if I was unclear, I have no problems building clang against a newer > gcc for my own purpose. But it doesn't make sense to provide a release > binary for clang that's hosted on llvm.org that's ostensibly for >

I'm getting errors: '/lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found' and '/usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not found'. Is there a way to make a backward-compatible binary? If not, is there a sane way to build something that needs gcc 4.8+/boost 1.5.3+/cmake 2.8 on Centos6? I found the devtoolset-2 software collection with a usable gcc, but no

Hello, Right now I am just using a Generator to look for symbols in my process (which links dynamically against libc / libm). It seems to have no trouble finding every other libc / libm / libc++ / ... symbol so I assumed that it was not necessary to specifically link against libm where these __finite symbols reside: $ nm -D /usr/lib/libm.so.6 | grep finite 0000000000050540 T

On 07/13/2018 07:42 AM, Matthew Phelps wrote: > Does anyone know of a CentOS 6 compiled version of the widevine DRM plugin? > > With Firefox 60ESR, Netflix (e.g.) installs a version in your > ~/.mozilla/firefox/(profile name)gmp-widevinecdm/ directory but it has the > following library failures in 'ldd' output: > >> ldd libwidevinecdm.so > ./libwidevinecdm.so:

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 9:23 AM Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 07/13/2018 08:17 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 07/13/2018 07:42 AM, Matthew Phelps wrote: > >> Does anyone know of a CentOS 6 compiled version of the widevine DRM > plugin? > >> > >> With Firefox 60ESR, Netflix (e.g.) installs a version in your > >>

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Phelps, Matthew <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu> wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail. > innovate.net> wrote: > >> >> > Date: Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:36:57 +0100 >> > From: isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> >> > >> > Has anyone tried the new flash

Hello, here is a repro which runs in a docker image. https://we.tl/t-O1EhIAOeOF To see the issue, run repro.sh It will first download a (big, sorry) centos:7 docker image with my build of LLVM-11 and build a simple lljit-based example. This example is called with some trivial .cpp which calls `cos`. When ran from *within the container* it works. When the same example, with the same bitcode

In the hope that some skilled developers are here: We have a commercial product that do not run under CentOS6 /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found Is it possible to compile software (compile switch?) on a system that uses a newer glibc but in such a way that can be used (executed) on a system with an older glibc (like here: compiled on glibc 2.14 based system but C6 is on

Hello, when building code with -Ofast -ffinite-math-only -ffast-math, clang generates calls to "finite" variants of math functions. This has been the source of a fair amount of issues in a "normal", non-JIT pipeline, which seem to have been fixed over time - a simple fix being recompiling the target app against the new glibc. - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44842 -